Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Do You Think A Biopsy Is Necessary In Canada


maribeth

Recommended Posts

maribeth Apprentice

i recently was diagnosed with celiac disease and have been waiting for a biopsy appt for sometime. my blood tests were positive and my osteoperosis got worse in the last year. i'm tired of waiting and have decided to start the gluten free diet-into my 2nd day. do other people feel the biopsy is necessary. do other canadians feel the biopsy should be done before the diet is started or not. have others gone on the diet without a biopsy. thanks for any input. beth.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Michi8 Contributor
i recently was diagnosed with celiac disease and have been waiting for a biopsy appt for sometime. my blood tests were positive and my osteoperosis got worse in the last year. i'm tired of waiting and have decided to start the gluten free diet-into my 2nd day. do other people feel the biopsy is necessary. do other canadians feel the biopsy should be done before the diet is started or not. have others gone on the diet without a biopsy. thanks for any input. beth.

You don't need a biopsy to go gluten free, but if you are intending on following through on the biopsy, it may be best to not go gluten free until after the biopsy is done. You do have the positive blood tests...you need to talk to you GI to see if there really is a need for doing the biopsy.

I'm waiting for my own biopsy at the end of November (I've been waiting since early August!) But I had negative blood tests, so I feel I need to the gastroscopy and biopsy to confirm, and to rule out any other health issues. My colonoscopy isn't happening until March! Waiting so long is a real hassle. :angry:

Michelle

Canadian Karen Community Regular

Hi Maribeth! Welcome to the forum! There's a bunch of really great, supportive people on here that will help you navigate through the gluten-free world and be there for support. Remember, there is no such thing as a stupid question on this forum. So feel free to ask whatever you need......

In regards to biopsy, well, I for one am not a big fan of the biopsy to confirm celiac, but it certainly is a good thing to have done to rule out everything else and put your mind at ease. See, the way to look at it is this:

Picture someone's back with a patchy rash on it. Now, a doctor is behind this person with blindfolds on, and is supposed to take biopsies of this back. Basically, it would be a 50/50 hit or miss as to whether the doctor got the rash part or not, right? Well, it's the same with the damage done in the intestine. It basically is hit or miss as to whether the doctor is going to take a part from the damaged part. So when it comes to the biopsy, yes, it can confirm celiac if you see villi damage, but if it comes back negative, that doesn't confirm you don't have it, as they could have just missed the damaged part.

Where in Canada are you? I am about 1 hour outside of Toronto..... If you are in Ontario, I could tell you some good places to get some great gluten free stuff.

In regards to the taxes, it works this way. If you save EVERY receipt of the gluten-free foods that you buy, you basically can claim the difference between the price of the regular stuff as opposed to the gluten free version. i.e. regular loaf of bread - $2.50 and gluten-free loaf of bread $5.50 - then you can claim the $3.00 on your taxes. The problem being is that they base it on your total family income. So basically, because in our household both my husband and myself have an income, the amount that I totalled throughout the year of what I spent on gluten-free food was below the minimum amount (which was outrageously high, IMO!) that you were allowed to claim. So for me, it was useless, but for others, it might help them......

Hope this helps a bit. Again, welcome to the forum!

Hugs.

Karen

tarnalberry Community Regular

lots of people here - canadian or not - don't have a biopsy. we've been diagnosed through a variety of means: blood tests, stool tests, dietary results, DH diagnoses, and some intestinal biopsies. some doctors think that biopsies are required, but that opinion is fading slowly, in favor of simply relying on blood tests. if you are producing antibodies to gluten, and and antibodies to your own tissue that only appear in the prescence of anti-gluten antibodies, well... it seems the answer's pretty clear.

maribeth Apprentice

hi michelle,

i really don't want to go thru with the biopsy but know i should just to see if there are any other problems. i'm scheduled to have a colonoscopy but again am waiting for the call. i know there's a long wait for that . i had a barium enema and stool sample done in aug and all showed ok. good luck with your tests beth.

You don't need a biopsy to go gluten free, but if you're intending on following through on the biopsy, it may be best to not go gluten free until after the biopsy is done. You do have the positive blood tests...you need to talk to you GI to see if there really is a need for doing the biopsy.

I'm waiting for my own biopsy at the end of November (I've been waiting since early August!) But I had negative blood tests, so I feel I need to the gastroscopy and biopsy to confirm, and to rule out any other health issues. My colonoscopy isn't happening until March! Waiting so long is a real hassle. :angry:

Michelle

happygirl Collaborator

please make sure you see others responses to your other thread:

Open Original Shared Link

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,205
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Sarahmegan
    Newest Member
    Sarahmegan
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.