Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

So Confused....


shan1523

Recommended Posts

shan1523 Rookie

Ok, mini-history...ds Noah started solids at 5 months age, reacted badly to oatmeal and barley cereal, rash, distended belly, screaming in pain and diarrhea, so we took him off gluten...well except I didnt know all hidden gluten stuff, so he would have diarrhea and the rash stayed for a few more months, he was always a big boy (9.8 born at 36 weeks, yes the dates were right) so when he didnt gain any weight for a few months, the dr's didnt worry, but when he didnt grow height wise (also tall--always 98% for height) they worried ...anyways we took him totally off gluten at 9 months, after I found this site, and talked to some others about what all gluten is...he had a bite of some glutened food at 14 months and screamed in pain, got the distended belly and diarhhea....the doc did some blood work (only 2 of the 5 tests though, I have since learned) and they told me in was inconclusive (didnt say yes, but didnt say no, and wanted me to continue the diet for now since he;s young)....flash to now..he is 2 years and 4 months...Im going crazy not knowing if its celiac or gluten intolerance....(I got tested all five tests, and Im negative) his baby sister is 3 months and we are going through multiple GERD tests and milk soy protien allergy issues, she has apnea issues blah blah blah...so I figured shes going through all the tests, might as well try Noah again with gluten, and do his tests(another reason - have paid our out pocket maxs for the year so all tests would be free to us right now)

ANYWAYS, point is, he has had gluten, small amouts, but gluten none the less, for 3 days now, and no diahrea no screaming no distended belly....Im so confused, I thought he would react somehow...but does this mean he outgrew his intolerance and never had celiac?

He couldnt drink milk for 2 years, but we trialed it in June and hes doing fine...(he has milk protein intolerance issues as a baby, but thankfully outgrew them)

Im so confused..and sick of being at the doctors..my three month old was at the ER sunday, her dr Mon, we have another appt tomorrow and a test on mon......

anyone else have a toddler that suddenly has no symptoms?

Thanks

Shannon


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Jestgar Rising Star

There was a study where they fed potentially Celiac babies gluten starting at different months (3-6 months, 6-9 months) and found that babies who started eating gluten sooner had more of the painful symptoms. Babies who started eating gluten later still developed the damaged villi, but didn't have the gastro symptoms.

So Noah could still have Celiac, but be in the silent phase of it.

You could try the antibody tests, or the biopsy, or just not feed him gluten, but I think feeding him gluten without finding out for sure might be doing him damage in the long run.

mommida Enthusiast

The kids don't seem to react to the accidental gluten exposures as I do. My daughter didn't seem to react for at least three or four last times, until she was just vomiting two days ago. (could have been a stomache bug, but she didn't have a fever only vomited once and has wanted to just sleep since and the brown circles under her eyes - Dr.'s call them allergy shiners)

You've got to remember that some people are asymptomatic.

You just don't know what kind of reaction you're going to get.

It is really hard trying to figure out what little ones are experiencing. My son gets brain fog so bad it scares him because he can't remember the words he wants to use, and then he can be so iiritable you just want to run away from him.

L.

shan1523 Rookie
The kids don't seem to react to the accidental gluten exposures as I do. My daughter didn't seem to react for at least three or four last times, until she was just vomiting two days ago.

Thats kinda why Im confused --in the past he has reacted to accidental glutening, and now no reaction at all...he is tired, but he also gave up naps and has a colicky/GERDling sister who keeps him awake....

I know part of me doesnt want to trial it in case Im hurting him, but then I also just want to know...like give it 2 weeks and then do the full celiac panel....

Thanks for the quick responses...

Shannon

ds Noah 6.28.04---gluten issues...now confused

dd Audrey 7.13.06---preemie, GERD, MSPI, apnea

GFBetsy Rookie

I believe that for the tests to be accurate, he'll have to be eating gluten for at least 3 months. (That's the recommendation, anyway.) If you are going to be worrying about this for years if you don't have a definitive diagnosis, then I'd suggest that you go through with the gluten challenge. My daughter's bloodwork came back "Indeterminate", but I knew it runs in the family, and I could see the symptoms she was displaying, so I took her off gluten anyway. 3 days later her diarhea was gone and she was smiling. For me, that's enough. When she does manage to eat gluten (sneaking her sister's sandwich crusts, etc.) she doesn't have any major reactions but her initial reactions make me stick with the diet. I decided that she can decide to do a gluten challenge when she gets to be 12 or so (if she wants), but until then I am going to do the best for her that I can - and that means keeping her off gluten.

That may seem like conflicting advice, but what I mean is: If you need a definitive diagnosis in order to be consistent with a gluten free diet, then do what you need to do in order to get one. Doing a gluten challenge for a few months is unlikely to kill him (although, if he does have celiac, it might lead to further food allergies because of the Leaky Gut problems celiac causes). Either way, think long and hard about it and weigh the options and then do what you need to do.

Good luck!

AndreaB Contributor

Even with going back on gluten for 3 months, it may not be long enough. Many teens and adults have suffered other intolerances and autoimmune diseases with challenges and/or not adhereing to the diet.

If you can, try enterolab. You can do the whole gluten panel or maybe just the gene test. If you know the genes you'll know more of what you're looking at.

Open Original Shared Link

Personally, I'm inclined to think that if he had a problem before it will manifest itself again at a later time.

shan1523 Rookie

Thanks for the replies...its just so hard, cuz I want to know, but I dont want him to suffer, my DH and I decided to stop trialing the gluten since tests are often inconclusive so young anyways (and I dont want to do the biopsy (my 3month old has to have one for gerd issues and that will be hard enough)

anyway we started to see his behavior and mood change,and he got an odd rash, not the typical DH rash, but a rash...so it was enough to know his body was reacting somehow...so we are off it again, and I dont plan on re-trying it for many many years...

I think i just had a momentary lapse of judgement on my part, I never really planned on re-intro-ing it so young, but I think Im just overwhelmed with my daughters issues I just wanted Noah's to be done...oh well...

thanks for all the replies though

Shannon


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,202
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    PatBurnham
    Newest Member
    PatBurnham
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.