Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Called To Go For Endoscopy

maribeth

By maribeth
in Coping with Celiac Disease

Recommended Posts

maribeth Apprentice
maribeth
Posted

Well I had a message on my AM from the dr that's going to do the endoscopy and a colonastomy. It's been 2 months since I was told by my dr that she would make an appointment with a specialist. I have called my dr and the specialist several times to find out when I could get an appt. and never heard back til now. I've been gluten-free for about 6 weeks now. I'm not going back to eating gluten!!! I was unable to get back to the dr as they were gone for the day and won't be able to call till monday now. Probably won't get in til the end of the month or even the new year and want to go while I'm off for the holidays instead of having to miss work again. Will anything abnormal show after 2-3 months of being gluten-free. Should I perhaps not have the endoscopy? I know you're supposed to be on gluten to have the test but I'm definately not going back on gluten as I feel so good now. Have a great day. Beth

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Guest nini
Guest nini
Posted

from what I understand if you are gluten free the endoscope won't show anything if there was damage to begin with. my personal opinion would be that you already have your answer and don't need to go through with the biopsy. I never had a biopsy and I do not doubt my dx one bit as I feel SOOOOOO much better off of gluten and I will never ever willingly go back to eating gluten again, especially not for any stupid test! You have your answer! Don't do it!

happygirl Collaborator
happygirl
Posted

If you want accurate tests, you must be eating gluten for an extended period of time.

I had positive bloodwork, and on the direction of my doctor, immediately went gluten free, had the biopsy five weeks later, and it was negative. I have since moved, and doctors look at my report and tell me I don't have Celiac...they dismiss me when I tell them the circumstances of the biopsy. They aren't interested.

Even if you go back on gluten now, it doesn't mean that damage will show up for them to diagnose.

Mary Contrary Rookie
Mary Contrary
Posted

Gee this sound just like me maribeth, I just made a thread in the wrong place..I put it in post diagnosis...but I am having my biopsy and a colonoscopy done on this Tuesday..I have however been off of wheat/gluten for 2 months now and I am finally starting to see a slowing down of my constant D...i am hoping something will still show up, surely if the villi of my small intestines is ruined it couldn't have healed up in 2 months, especially if i am still having D.

my regular Doc is awful..i made the appointment with the Gastro myself and was lucky enough to get in fairly soon...and he listened to me...i like the man alot..my regular Doc told me to go home and eat toast... :rolleyes:

oh by the way i did have blood work done and it was negative..but I am certain it is Celiacs..if you read my other post, I have had on going issues with wheat for along time...

daffadilly Apprentice
daffadilly
Posted

Everyone has to make their own decisions, I personally would skip it. Instead i would just get the Enterolab gene test... & maybe the fat absoption test, if that is clear then it really means that your villi are okay.

IMO biopsy is not necessary, if you want to a doctors permission to eat a healthy diet, then you will almost have to kill yourself first by eating gluten and then if you happen to have DQ1 genes you might not get the villi atrophy anyway - but you might get lots of other damage that they will not look for.

Even if you villi are damaged it can be spotty & if they do not take up to 15 biopsies they will surely miss it. Then there is the matter of the doctor "reading" the biopsy...

seems like a lot of trouble for nothing to me, but if you want an Official diagnosis then that is what you have to do, but you sound like you have your priorities all together already...

Helena Contributor
Helena
Posted
If you want accurate tests, you must be eating gluten for an extended period of time.

I had positive bloodwork, and on the direction of my doctor, immediately went gluten free, had the biopsy five weeks later, and it was negative. I have since moved, and doctors look at my report and tell me I don't have Celiac...they dismiss me when I tell them the circumstances of the biopsy. They aren't interested.

Even if you go back on gluten now, it doesn't mean that damage will show up for them to diagnose.

Happygirl,

I know you're seeing some specialists at well known research centres---are these the dr's who are telling you that you don't have celiac?!? I could see a GP who doesn't really know that much about celiac doing so . . . but I would expect people who are actively engaged in medical research to listen to what you have to say especially since you really know what you are talking about. Have you brought in journal articles to prove your point? How can they ignore what experts on celiac say on the matter?

Am feeling good about my decision not to go through with the biopsy at the moment (and I've been feeling ambivalent). . . . I might not have given the villi enough of a chance to get damaged and if I had gone through with it it could very well have been negative. But as is, the blood tests are strongly suggestive of celiac and my GI doc has recommended we skip the biopsy I hope that dr's I deal with in the future take that seriously.

Mary Contrary Rookie
Mary Contrary
Posted
Everyone has to make their own decisions, I personally would skip it. Instead i would just get the Enterolab gene test... & maybe the fat absoption test, if that is clear then it really means that your villi are okay.

IMO biopsy is not necessary, if you want to a doctors permission to eat a healthy diet, then you will almost have to kill yourself first by eating gluten and then if you happen to have DQ1 genes you might not get the villi atrophy anyway - but you might get lots of other damage that they will not look for.

Even if you villi are damaged it can be spotty & if they do not take up to 15 biopsies they will surely miss it. Then there is the matter of the doctor "reading" the biopsy...

seems like a lot of trouble for nothing to me, but if you want an Official diagnosis then that is what you have to do, but you sound like you have your priorities all together already...

I really appreciate your opinion, I have everything scheduled for tomorrow and am going to have it done, the colonoscopy is my main objective, I want the piece of mind that there isn't something else going on, even though I am quite sure there isn't.

And if the biopsys are negative, which it sounds like they will be, well so be it. If there is nothing else wrong with me, then that will be my answer regardless. I'll know for sure it is Celiacs, because I am already, after my two months off of gluten, starting to get. I don't need a test to verify it for me, I won't eat gluten again just for the sake of a positive test. Atleast with this disease you don't need anybody's permission or diagnosis to take care of yourself.

I'll just feel better, mentally atleast, after the colonoscopy, because there is always that nagging feeling that it could be something serious or life threatening. And as long as I'm there and prepared for it I'll, go ahead with the endoscopy as well.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


happygirl Collaborator
happygirl
Posted
Happygirl,

I know you're seeing some specialists at well known research centres---are these the dr's who are telling you that you don't have celiac?!? I could see a GP who doesn't really know that much about celiac doing so . . . but I would expect people who are actively engaged in medical research to listen to what you have to say especially since you really know what you are talking about. Have you brought in journal articles to prove your point? How can they ignore what experts on celiac say on the matter?

Am feeling good about my decision not to go through with the biopsy at the moment (and I've been feeling ambivalent). . . . I might not have given the villi enough of a chance to get damaged and if I had gone through with it it could very well have been negative. But as is, the blood tests are strongly suggestive of celiac and my GI doc has recommended we skip the biopsy I hope that dr's I deal with in the future take that seriously.

Let's see....my doc at JH (that I love!) says that no matter what we want to call it, gluten is a problem for me (Celiac vs. gluten intolerance vs. sensitivity vs. allergy, he doesn't care).

my doc at NIH was kind of on the fence....he recognized that gluten bothered me, but didn't know about "intolerance."

a doc who used to be a leading armed forces doc (i'll leave it at that) told me basically it was all in my head

none of these are Celiac specialists...if you aren't a Celiac specialist/take a specific interest in Celiac...they don't care. I could tell you athe worst story about doc #3....it was not a pleasant app't.

And people wonder why I'm disillusioned sometimes :P

Helena Contributor
Helena
Posted

Gotta love those docs whose explanation for everything they don't know about is 'it's all in your head'! I think it is an ego thing----this way they have an explanation for everything. There's *nothing* they can't diagnose.

Well, at least the other docs believed that you shouldn't be eating gluten even if they aren't informed about diagnosing celiac.

I just thought that doctors who are at the top of their field would tend to realize that their understanding of everything that isn't in their particular research area is sketchy and that they'd look things up if they didn't know them off the top of their head. But I guess that's overly idealistic!

happygirl Collaborator
happygirl
Posted

girl, i would've thought so too.....but it is not the case for all of them, unfortunately!

hopefully, word will get out....

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,602
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Victor bowden
    Newest Member
    Victor bowden
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wheatwacked
      Potential celiac need advice

      By Wheatwacked · Posted

      Yes.  Now, if you hit your finger with a hammer once, wouldn't you do your best not to do it again?  You have identified a direct connection between gluten and pain.  Gluten is your hammer.  Now you have to decide if you need a medical diagnosis.  Some countries have aid benefits tgat you can get if you have the diagnosis, but you must continue eating a gluten-normal diet while pursuing the diagnosis. Otherwise the only reason to continue eating gluten is social. There are over 200 symptoms that could be a result of celiac disease.. Celiac Disease and Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity  both cause multiple vitamin and mineral deficiency.  Dealing with that should help your recovery, even while eating gluten.  Phosphatidyl Choline supplements can help your gut if digesting fats is a problem,  Consider that any medications you take could be causing some of the symptoms, aside from gluten.        
    • trents
      Potential celiac need advice

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @Ben98! If you have been consciously or unconsciously avoiding gluten because of the discomfort it produces then it is likely that your blood antibody testing for celiac disease has been rendered invalid. Valid testing requires regular consumption of generous amounts of gluten. The other strong possibility is that you have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) which shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease but does not have the autoimmune component and thus does not damage the small bowel lining. It is 10x mor common than celiac disease. There is currently no test for NCGS. Celiac disease must first be ruled out. Some experts in the field believe it can be a precursor to the development of celiac disease. Having one or both of the primary genes for developing celiac disease does not imply that you will develop active celiac disease. It simply establishes the potential for it. About 40% of the population has the genetic potential but only about 1% develop active celiac disease. 
    • Ben98
      Potential celiac need advice

      By Ben98 · Posted

      TTG blood test and total IGA tested on many occasions which have always remained normal, upper GI pain under my ribs since 2022. I had an endoscopy in 2023 which showed moderate gastritis. no biopsy’s were taken unfortunately. genetic test was positive for HLADQ2. extreme bloating after eating gluten, it’ll feel like I’ve got bricks in my stomach so uncomfortably full. the pain is like a dull ache under the upper left almost like a stitch feeling after a long walk. I am just wanting some advice has anyone here experienced gastritis with a gluten issue before? thank you  
    • Wheatwacked
      Unusual bright yellow but odourless discharge

      By Wheatwacked · Posted

      "Conclusions: The urinary iodine level was significantly lower in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, and iodine replacement may be important in preventing osteoporosis"  Body iodine status in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis Low iodine can cause thyroid problems, but Iodine deficiency will not show up in thyroid tests.  Iodine is important for healing, its job is to kill off defective and aging cells (Apoptosis). Skin, brain fog, nails, muscle tone all inproved when I started taking 600 mcg (RDA 150 - 1000 mcg) of Liquid Iodine drops. Some with dermatitis herpetiformis, Iodine exacerbates the rash.  I started at 1 drop (50 mcg) and worked up to 12 drops, but I don't have dermatitis herpetiformis.
    • cristiana
      How long does it take to gain weight?

      By cristiana · Posted

      That's great news, you can do this.  Let us know how things go and don't hesitate to ask if you have any more questions. Cristiana 😊
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.