Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Any Long Term Studies On Gluten/cc & Risks?


2wheels4eyes

Recommended Posts

2wheels4eyes Explorer

Despite my care, I've glutened myself for the second time this week--not even sure on what at this point. I think just CC, either in my house or the pre-made/packaged foods (which are gluten-free--ha ha--but "made in facilities that...")

So tonight I'm sitting for a dinner I had no interest in eating at Outback's, waiting for my latest symptoms to pass (fortunately I don't think it was a lot of gluten--and I hasten to add this wasn't Outback--I glutened myself at home.) Everyone at the table is talking about, y'know, life and stuff and in the back of my head I'm thinking about my gut. And how stupid I am that this happened again. And about the relatives I learned about last week (all my grandmother's generation or before) that were diagnosed with celiac disease too late in life and died of rare intestinal cancers in their 50s or early 60s.

I have no intention of dying in my 50s or 60s of some stupid celiac disease-related thing (I'm 29; dx'd 8 mos. ago.) I'm beginning to think my greater risk with celiac disease isn't cancer & osteo but paranoia.

Does anyone know of any *good* long term studies of morbidity in those following the gluten-free diet? I know they've got some ballpark figures and that lab tests show even minute amounts can damage the villi. But c'mon. Just because they can detect the effects of gluten doesn't mean (necessarily) that my risks for various things has gone up until that damage is severe enough.

I'm guessing that a really good, longitudinal, double-blind trial hasn't been done, first because who would spend the $ on something like that and second because you'd have to put celiacs on gluten diets and then conduct repeated biopsies. But maybe something could be done using non-compliant (non-gluten-free) celiacs and those sticking to the gluten-free diet? Anyone heard of such things? I want hard numbers on risks as correlated to frequency and severity of gluten exposures.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



happygirl Collaborator

To my knowledge, there are no studies that link exposure/glutenings to morbidity. That would be near impossible to do, as we don't always know when we are glutened (i.e., esp for asymptomatic Celiacs), so the validity/reliability of a study such as this would be highly questionable.

In general, it appears that the higher risk of morbidity and most other serious problems (cancer, etc) increases for those who are not on a gluten free diet but are Celiacs. Going gluten free and maintaining (with, some accidents, of course, but in general, gluten free) the diet lowers this risk (same with fertility numbers/Celiac).

here are some references to some of the studies of morbidity.

https://www.celiac.com/st_prod.html?p_prodi...-25107204802.c9

https://www.celiac.com/st_prod.html?p_prodi...-25107204802.c9

2wheels4eyes Explorer
To my knowledge, there are no studies that link exposure/glutenings to morbidity. That would be near impossible to do, as we don't always know when we are glutened (i.e., esp for asymptomatic Celiacs), so the validity/reliability of a study such as this would be highly questionable.

Right--unless you purposely glutened people occasionally in a lab environment and then marked the effects over a period of years. Which no one would get IRB approval for anyway--hence relying on subjects' self reports, food diaries, etc. as a proxy for lab glutenings. Like for the two above studies you linked, what does it mean to be "gluten-free" exactly? How strictly (or not) are the diets being followed?

Not that I'm a cheater--I just find it maddening not to know what the correlation is between exposure and risk.

Thanks for the links!!!

Celiac Sufferer Newbie
Right--unless you purposely glutened people occasionally in a lab environment and then marked the effects over a period of years. Which no one would get IRB approval for anyway--hence relying on subjects' self reports, food diaries, etc. as a proxy for lab glutenings. Like for the two above studies you linked, what does it mean to be "gluten-free" exactly? How strictly (or not) are the diets being followed?

Not that I'm a cheater--I just find it maddening not to know what the correlation is between exposure and risk.

Thanks for the links!!!

Celiac Disease even following the diet can cause problems. I have been on a gluten-free diet for 4 years and have had 6 surgeries and were all related to Celiac disease. I even have heart problems due to Celiac. The reason for that is because I was diagnosed too late. I am 21 years old and all though my life had horrid symptoms and even bone deformaties and I had a hard time gaining weight because throughout my younger life the doctors told me I had IBS. They didn't do any test. Until I was in High School they noticed that I was weighin in at 88 pounds. The doctor rushed me into a Endo and colonoscopy and found out I had a severe case of Celiac Disease. For 4 years being on the Diet I still run into lots of problems. They come one right after the other. That is because I am Nonresponsive Celiac Disease. That means I not getting the tummy symptoms, but the Celiac is damaging other parts of my body. You know that Celiac Disease is not an allergy it is an Auto Immune Disease. So I will have a lifetime of complications from cancer to getting other auto immune diseases. It is very important to stay on the Gluten-Free diet and try not to contaminate or run into gluten because yes a little tiny bit can trigger the celiac to become more active. My Celiac will be always active due to the fact of having such a severe case and being diagnosed to late.

2wheels4eyes Explorer

Celiac Sufferer... my heart goes out to you... thanks for sharing with me your hard-earned knowledge about celiac disease.

I'm symptomatic after CC but usually not to a debilitating degree (i.e., don't usually have to take time off work or anything.) It's more frustrating when I know I'm in control of what I eat (ha ha) and still end up making mistakes that could jeopardize my health.

However, I think my post was motivated in equal parts by a desire for better research and a desire to simply whine!

Generic Apprentice

From personal experience, I believe it can cause more problems. I have been gluten free for 19 years and have been accidentally glutened more times than I care to remember. I have since developed over the years hypoglycemia, fibromyalgia and something else that they aren't sure of yet. Possibly MS, rheumatoid arthritis or myositis.

Yippee! :angry: I just wonder what other auto-immune disease I will develop as I get older. I try to stay positive but it is hard sometimes. I often wonder if it is going to shorten my life. But so far my grandparents lived into their 80's and I'm pretty sure they were undiagnosed celiac.

Oh and not to mention I have put more money into my mouth than what my jeep is worth.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    2. - Roses8721 posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      0

      gluten-free Oatmeal

    3. - Roses8721 replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,473
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kelly Hannon
    Newest Member
    Kelly Hannon
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Certainly, it would b wise to have a gene test done if your physician is open to it as it would provide some more data to understand what's going on. But keep in mind that the genetic test for celiac disease cannot be used as to diagnose celiac disease, only to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population possess one or both of the primary genes known to be associated with the development of active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develop active celiac disease. So, the gene test is an effective "rule out" tool but not an effective diagnostic tool.
    • Roses8721
      Had Quaker gluten-free oatmeal last night and my stomach is a mess today. NO flu but def stomach stuff. Anyone else?
    • Roses8721
      So you would be good with the diagnosis and not worry to check genetics etc etc? Appreciate your words!
    • Scott Adams
      As recommended by @Flash1970, you may want to get this: https://www.amazon.com/Curist-Lidocaine-Maximum-Strength-Topical/dp/B09DN7GR14/
    • Scott Adams
      For those who will likely remain gluten-free for life anyway due to well-known symptoms they have when eating gluten, my general advice is to ignore any doctors who push to go through a gluten challenge to get a formal diagnosis--and this is especially true for those who have severe symptoms when they eat gluten. It can take months, or even years to recover from such a challenge, so why do this if you already know that gluten is the culprit and you won't be eating it anyway?  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS--but those in this group will usually have negative tests, or at best, elevated antibodies that don't reach the level of official positive. Unfortunately test results for celiac disease are not always definitive, and many errors can be made when doing an endoscopy for celiac disease, and they can happen in many ways, for example not collecting the samples in the right areas, not collecting enough samples, or not interpreting the results properly and giving a Marsh score.  Many biopsy results can also be borderline, where there may be certain damage that could be associated with celiac disease, but it just doesn't quite reach the level necessary to make a formal diagnosis. The same is true for blood test results. Over the last 10 years or so a new "Weak Positive" range has been created by many labs for antibody results, which can simply lead to confusion (some doctors apparently believe that this means the patient can decide if they want more testing or to go gluten-free). There is no "Weak Negative" category, for example. Many patients are not told to eat gluten daily, lots of it, for the 6-8 week period leading up to their blood test, nor asked whether or not they've been eating gluten. Some patients even report to their doctors that they've been gluten-free for weeks or months before their blood tests, yet their doctors incorrectly say nothing to them about how this can affect their test, and create false negative results. Many people are not routinely given a total IGA blood test when doing a blood screening, which can lead to false negative interpretations if the patient has low IGA. We've seen on this forum many times that some doctors who are not fully up on how interpret the blood test results can tell patients that the don't need to follow a gluten-free diet or get more testing because only 1 of the 2 or 3 tests done in their panel is positive (wrong!), and the other 1 or 2 tests are negative.  Dermatologists often don't know how to do a proper skin biopsy for dermatitis herpetiformis, and when they do it wrongly their patient will continue to suffer with terrible DH itching, and all the risks associated with celiac disease. For many, the DH rash is the only presentation of celiac disease. These patients may end up on strong prescriptions for life to control their itching which also may have many negative side effects, for example Dapsone. Unfortunately many people will continue to suffer needlessly and eat gluten due to these errors in performing or interpreting celiac disease tests, but luckily some will find out about non-celiac gluten sensitivity on their own and go gluten-free and recover from their symptoms. Consider yourself lucky if you've figured out that gluten is the source of your health issues, and you've gone gluten-free, because many people will never figure this out.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.