Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Retested After 29 Years- ? About Tests- Please Help


kbkbab

Recommended Posts

kbkbab Newbie

Hello everyone,

Here is a little history about myself and my Celiac Lifestyle. I am 31 diagnosed back in the 70's so have had it for 29 years. According to my mother, a biopsy was done, they said I had, no questions asked.

I have "cheated" more so within the last 10-15 years of this, and have NO symptoms of any kind. I haven't packed down a Pizza, but have eaten Cake and other items I know contained wheat, rye, barley oats or flour in them. Nothing has ever happened as a result of eating these items.

Nobody in my family has it, and no history of Mother/Father side who can recall ever having anything wrong with them.

I had blood work done, retested and the Dr told me today my TTG was Normal. I had a DQ2 Positive and a DQ8 negative. She said I should still have an Endoscopy, which I have to wait for as I am 5 weeks away from having my third child. Husband is supportive as others around me. What do any of these things mean to anyone?

The weeks wait for the blood work was torture, now ot wait another month and a half to have the Endoscopy will be brutal. I don't know at all what the Positive and negative results mean...

Anyone?? Help please???

Thank you

kbkbab


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Nancym Enthusiast

Well, I think once you get healed it can take years of full time gluten eating to get back to the serious damage they can detect with an endoscopy or blood tests. Meanwhile, what if you are and eating wheat causes enough damage that you're not getting as much nutrition as you need, especially while pregnant?

A gluten free diet never hurt anyone... if it were me, I'd err on the side of paranoia especially while I was having children, or planning to.

Viola 1 Rookie

Yes ... if you have been mostly Gluten Free the tests would likely be negative. You could try genetic testing and see if you carry the genes.

Electra Enthusiast
Yes ... if you have been mostly Gluten Free the tests would likely be negative. You could try genetic testing and see if you carry the genes.

Hey if the gene tests comes back negative then you know you don't have it right? You can not get Celiac if you do not have the gene can you?

kbkbab Newbie

Thank you for the feedback. Here are the results of some of the tests she did for me:

TTG Normal

DQ2 was positive

and the DQ8 was negative.

She tested all other things such as Vitamins and other nutritional cvalues, and all came back normal. I would assume ANY gluten in my body, I would not be able to absorb any nutrients, and all where normal. All pregnancies have been normal and both my children are fine. Show no symptoms and have never had issues.

I am, eating gluten. Not as much as say a bowl of Pasta, but various things that ingred we are not supposed to eat.

happygirl Collaborator

As mentioned above, she was gene tested. Positive DQ2.

In general, if you have ever been diagnosed with it, it means you have it. But, its hard to say if you were diagnosed correctly, given that you don't have a lot of info about it. A biopsy is the gold standard for a diagnosis, as the "blunted villi" in the small intestine are the classic hallmark of Celiac.

You can't outgow Celiac: so if you truly had it then, you have it now, even if you do/don't have any symptoms. If you had an intolerance or allergy, you can "outgrow" it, potentially.

I don't really know what the deal is, but I hope this helped a bit. Best of luck, and let us know what we can do to help, either way.

Electra Enthusiast
Thank you for the feedback. Here are the results of some of the tests she did for me:

TTG Normal

DQ2 was positive

and the DQ8 was negative.

She tested all other things such as Vitamins and other nutritional cvalues, and all came back normal. I would assume ANY gluten in my body, I would not be able to absorb any nutrients, and all where normal. All pregnancies have been normal and both my children are fine. Show no symptoms and have never had issues.

I am, eating gluten. Not as much as say a bowl of Pasta, but various things that ingred we are not supposed to eat.

If you have Celiac and it seems like you do, then you may be able to eat gluten for years before you become mal nourished. Unless you eat massive amounts of it then it may not cause any noticeable effects for you, but every time you eat it you are putting yourself at risk for certain cancers and diseases that Celiacs are at a higher risk for. The longer a Celiac eats gluten the higher their chances are at getting Celiac related diseases and cancers. It's definitely a personal decision, but If I was eating gluten and getting the rash then I'd definitely be convinced I had DH and Celiac!!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



happygirl Collaborator
The longer a Celiac eats gluten the higher their chances are at getting Celiac related diseases and cancers.

Are there studies for this, that actually assess the time/amount of gluten consumed, versus being a diagnosed/treated Celiac or an undiagnosed/untreated Celiac?

In general, the studies that I have seen only differentiate between treated and untreated/undiagnosed Celiacs.

Not that the overall theory behind the above statement is or isn't hypothetically, but I would like to know if there is actual evidence of this.

tarnalberry Community Regular

If you've been primarily gluten-free (or even just fairly gluten-light), you'll likely find your test results unreliable, particularly the tTg. Standard quantities for ingestion for testing are 3-4 slices of bread a day for three months. (That's a pretty big bowl a pasta every day.)

Electra Enthusiast
Are there studies for this, that actually assess the time/amount of gluten consumed, versus being a diagnosed/treated Celiac or an undiagnosed/untreated Celiac?

In general, the studies that I have seen only differentiate between treated and untreated/undiagnosed Celiacs.

Not that the overall theory behind the above statement is or isn't hypothetically, but I would like to know if there is actual evidence of this.

I'm not sure about studies but almost all of the research I read states that eating gluten significantly increases your risks of other disorder and diseases associated with Celiac Disease. Here are some exaples.

"The gluten-free diet must be carefully and continuously followed. When untreated, the disease can cause life-threatening complications. A delayed diagnosis or non-compliance with the diet places you at risk for developing associated conditions such as infertility, miscarriage, osteoporosis, fractures, certain types of intestinal cancer, or other autoimmune disorders."

Open Original Shared Link

"A link has also been discovered between untreated celiac disease and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma. This is true also for patients with dermatitis herpetiformis. Studies have shown, however, that the risk of contracting this condition is reduced when the gluten-free diet is strictly maintained. It has also been found that bowel adenocarcinoma may develop when celiac disease is untreated for a long period of time."

Open Original Shared Link

"The only treatment for celiac disease/DH is the lifelong adherence to a gluten-free diet.

Dietary compliance increases the quality of life and decreases the likelihood of osteoporosis, intestinal lymphoma and other associated illnesses."

Open Original Shared Link disease-treatment.php

"What are the long-term effects of celiac disease?

Untreated celiac disease can be life threatening. Celiacs are more likely to be afflicted with problems relating to malabsorption, including osteoporosis, tooth enamel defects, central and peripheral nervous system disease, pancreatic disease, internal hemorrhaging, organ disorders (gall bladder, liver, and spleen), and gynecological disorders. Untreated celiac disease has also been linked an increased risk of certain types of cancer, especially intestinal lymphoma."

Open Original Shared Link

The only treatment for Celiac is strictly adhering to a gluten free diet, so if you are still eating gluten periodically then you are not treating it correctly and you are putting yourself at risk.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Colleen H replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Gluten related ??

    2. - Jmartes71 replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    3. - AlwaysLearning replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    4. - AlwaysLearning replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      2

      Gluten related ??


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,076
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Deb baker
    Newest Member
    Deb baker
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Colleen H
      Thank you so much for your response  Yes it seems as though things get very painful as time goes on.  I'm not eating gluten as far as I know.  However, I'm not sure of cross contamination.  My system seems to weaken to hidden spices and other possibilities. ???  if cross contamination is possible...I am in a super sensitive mode of celiac disease.. Neuropathy from head to toes
    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
    • Russ H
      This treatment looks promising. Its aim is to provoke immune tolerance of gluten, possibly curing the disease. It passed the phase 2 trial with flying colours, and I came across a post on Reddit by one of the study volunteers. Apparently, the results were good enough that the company is applying for fast track approval.  Anokion Announces Positive Symptom Data from its Phase 2 Trial Evaluating KAN-101 for the Treatment of Celiac Disease https://www.reddit.com/r/Celiac/comments/1krx2wh/kan_101_trial_put_on_hold/
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.