Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Poll: Were You Or Your Children Breast-fed?


Mtndog

Were you breast fed?  

84 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

prinsessa Contributor

I was bf for about 2 years. My mom stopped because she was pregnant with my brother.

DD was bf for 2 months.

DS is over 3 years old and still bfs once every week or so. I thought he was weaned because he didn't ask to bf for weeks, but this past week he started asking again. He has a couple of bottles of formula when he was a baby, but he didn't like it (he didn't even want my milk if it was in a bottle).


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



2boysmama Apprentice

I was breastfed until about six months (I think). I breastfed my first son for a year and didn't learn of his gluten sensitivity until about six months ago (he's 3 now). I'm currently breastfeeding our almost-seven month old son, and plan to continue until at least a year - maybe 18 months.

confused Community Regular

I wasnt breastfeed as a kid. I did try with my first son, my milk didnt come in, with my second son was was born 6 weeks early, i tried for about 2 weeks, i even pumped and nothing came in, he became very jaundice, so i had to bottle feed, my first daughter, my milk never came and in and i tried again with my last daughter and again my milk never came in.

I am really thinking i have had wheat intolerance/celiac for a very long time

paula

MrsYoung84 Newbie

I voted yes: 1-2 years.

Rosario was breastfed until she was 13 months.

I only stopped because she was having problems with her weight gain and the peds [and I] thought it was because she wasn't eating enough table food and relying on being nursed even if she didn't eat her meals.

I wonder now, even though she hasn't been diagnosed yet if she was getting gluten through my milk and that was causing problems. I guess I'll wait until the tests come back... :rolleyes:

dlp252 Apprentice

I finally voted, lol. No I was not breast fed at all. My mom started me immediately on formula and when that gave me eczema, switched me to soy formula.

  • 2 weeks later...
amber Explorer
We've been talking in another thread about breast feeding and celiac and many of us were wondering how many people with celiac were breast-fed and for how long. Here's a link to that topic:Open Original Shared Link

I breast fed my daughter for 18 months and she was diagnosed with celiac six months after I stopped feeding her.

Kyalesyin Apprentice

This poll is interesting, given that my wife and I are planning to have children in a few years time. She was born severely premature, and so wasn't breast fed, because by the time she was de-tanked her mother's milk had all but dried up. She was always a sickly child- athsmatic tendencies, psoriasis, eczema, poor muslce tone, all of that. Cleared up the second we went gluten-free.

We've talked to her mother, who has never really had any of the celiac symptoms and although she tried going gluten-free nothing much changed, and we're wondering if my wife was simply born so premature that her gut wasn't strong enough to cope, since there seems to be very little in the way of genetic indicator.

I hope that made sense.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Michi8 Contributor
This poll is interesting, given that my wife and I are planning to have children in a few years time. She was born severely premature, and so wasn't breast fed, because by the time she was de-tanked her mother's milk had all but dried up. She was always a sickly child- athsmatic tendencies, psoriasis, eczema, poor muslce tone, all of that. Cleared up the second we went gluten-free.

We've talked to her mother, who has never really had any of the celiac symptoms and although she tried going gluten-free nothing much changed, and we're wondering if my wife was simply born so premature that her gut wasn't strong enough to cope, since there seems to be very little in the way of genetic indicator.

I hope that made sense.

My understanding is that celiac is genetic, so perhaps she doesn't get the gene from her mother? Has your wife had genetic testing done? Otherwise, it seems that her trigger to activate celiac was when she was a baby...not surprising for a preemie...especially considering all infants are born with immature digestive tracts. Breastmilk, especially colostrum, is an important part of developing healthy intestinal flora.

Michelle

Kyalesyin Apprentice
My understanding is that celiac is genetic, so perhaps she doesn't get the gene from her mother? Has your wife had genetic testing done? Otherwise, it seems that her trigger to activate celiac was when she was a baby...not surprising for a preemie...especially considering all infants are born with immature digestive tracts. Breastmilk, especially colostrum, is an important part of developing healthy intestinal flora.

Michelle

We haven't had genetic testing. We fought for three months just to get her a blood test done when a friend of mine who is still a med student said 'I know what these symptoms look like...' as it is, the health service has refused point blank to do any testing at all. According to our last doctor, you can't check for food intelorences with a blood test. She's a university student see, so the doctors just ask 'what have you taken, how much did you have to drink and who have you slept with?' and go deaf after that. In the end, we paid out for a private lab to do blood tests, but the health service doesn't recognise them as 'official enough.'

As it is, we went gluten free and haven't looked back, but even so.

We didn't even think of her father in this, simply because he's healthy as a horse. Nothing at all we could associate with celiacs. Her mother has always been a little sickly though, and osteoperosis runs in the family, but going gluten free didn't change much, if anything for her.

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular
My understanding is that celiac is genetic, so perhaps she doesn't get the gene from her mother? Has your wife had genetic testing done? Otherwise, it seems that her trigger to activate celiac was when she was a baby...not surprising for a preemie...especially considering all infants are born with immature digestive tracts. Breastmilk, especially colostrum, is an important part of developing healthy intestinal flora.

Michelle

All true; however, I am now convinced that, while there is definitely a genetic component to celiac, especially when it appears in an infant, gluten intolerance combined with continued gluten ingestion DOES lead to celiac (if you define celiac as changes to the villi).

And as an adult, you can be as "healthy as a horse" one day, and suddenly develop an autoimmune condition the next--look how many of us this has happened to!

Michi8 Contributor
All true; however, I am now convinced that, while there is definitely a genetic component to celiac, especially when it appears in an infant, gluten intolerance combined with continued gluten ingestion DOES lead to celiac (if you define celiac as changes to the villi).

And as an adult, you can be as "healthy as a horse" one day, and suddenly develop an autoimmune condition the next--look how many of us this has happened to!

One certainly won't develop celiac if they never ingest gluten. That's the same with allergies...you cannot become allergic to something you aren't exposed to.

I don't know about autoimmune conditions coming on suddenly, though. I think it's a gradual process that isn't noticed until symptoms are impossible to ignore or brush off as "normal."

Michelle

marlykarly Rookie

I was not bf.. and have celiac

However My two celiac boys were both bf.. and one of them for over 2 years..

my shortest bf child.(2mo). does not have celiac

So i blow the stats

sarah ruth Newbie

I and both my kids were breastfed over two years. :rolleyes: ..wish I had cut out wheat before my pregnancies and nursing because my inability to digest things certainly triggered reactions in my babies. I know breastfeeding is best, and support it 100%, but it's not a panacea for all whoes. My husband was the only child not breastfed of his siblings and is the healthiest by far (mind you, fed raw milk fresh from their cow!). It's interesting to read how babies are fed, and am curious how this relates to "averages".

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,873
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    CSam
    Newest Member
    CSam
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Being low in B12, Folate B9, ferritin, zinc and copper sounds consistent with anemia which can often occur with Celiac.  What did your doctor recommend? What about your Vitamin D?  It helps regulate the immune system.  
    • ehb
      @knitty kitty thank you I am exploring these options, I really appreciate all the suggestions and info. I am only slightly below the normal range for folate, zinc and copper. And in the low end of the normal range for B12, ferritin, and vitamin A. I’m good for carotene magnesium and iron, but I’ve been taking 400 mg magnesium daily 
    • Alibu
      I just had my endoscopy the other day and the doctor took 12 samples because he said if we're going to find something we're going to find it today LOL. But when he got down there, he said everything looked good. So I have it in my head again that it's going to be negative because everyone I've heard of who had a positive biopsy had their endoscopies where the doctor was like yep, I can see the damage. My tissues all look great apparently. So if they come back negative, I'm not sure where to go from here. Could it still be a non-celiac gluten sensitivity even with my blood work? I thought NCGS didn't show up on blood tests. Is it possible that the biopsy still comes back positive even if everything looked healthy on endoscope? I had it done at a big hospital in the state, so I would think they'd have the kind of equipment where they'd be able to see it well. I even have pictures in my report and they don't seem to have the damage that others have seen.
    • trents
      That's just it. When they are doing an EGD, even with biopsy, if they aren't thinking about celiac disease they may miss it. They should take several samples from both the duodenum and the duodenum bulb. Damage can be patchy and easily missed if sampling isn't through. And patch damage may explain lack of dramatic symptoms. Let me assure you that we frequently have posters on this forum who were silent celiacs for years and were diagnosed incidentally with celiac disease when their docs were checking for other things. They developed other medical problems such as anemia or vitamin and mineral deficiencies, neurological deficits, Hashimodo's thyroid, osteoporois, etc. - non GI symptoms - but their docs recognized those problems as often connected to celiac disease and had them checked for celiac disease, both blood antibody testing and biopsy, and found damage. A couple of years ago the Mayo Clinic did a large study involving over 300 people. They started with those officially diagnosed with celiac disease and also tested their first degree relatives. They found that almost 50% of  the first degree relatives tested positive for celiac disease and many or most were totally caught by surprise because they were largely asymptomatic. Their diagnosis was confirmed by biopsy. I really don't have anything more to say. You have some decisions to make.
    • knitty kitty
      Blood tests are affected by what you've had to eat in the previous day or two and any vitamin supplements you've taken in the past month or two.   If you have been taking vitamins before the time of the blood test, the vitamins supplements could mask a deficiency.  So get the tests before supplementing, or allow eight to twelve weeks for the supplements to wear off.    The thing with blood tests is that they measure what is in the blood, not what is stored inside organs and tissues where vitamins are actually utilized, and may miss subclinical deficiencies.  In times of shortages, the brain can order cells to release their stored vitamins into the blood stream in order to keep important organs like the brain and heart functioning.   Overall, getting blood tests for deficiencies is a good idea if it's available to you.  Ask for an Erythrocyte Transketolace test for Thiamine deficiency.  If you're deficient in any of the B vitamins, take a B Complex with all the B's in it.  The eight B vitamins work with one another like an orchestra.  Supplementing just one can throw the others off.  
×
×
  • Create New...