Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gene Testing?


earthmama

Recommended Posts

earthmama Newbie

Hi,

I'm new here (though have spent countless hours as a guest learner) and am finally ready to post! I stumbled upon all of this when I did a gluten free trial myself this fall and am literally a new person (headaches, fatugue, daily nausea, bloating and indigestion). DD had frequent tummy aches, constipation, pale stools, canker sores and unexplained mood swings. All symptoms cleared up within days on a gluten free diet. I'm willing to stay on the diet myself without a confirmed dx but was not willing to commit a 5 year old to it so decided to do the gene test on dd through Enterolab (which I hoped might also shed light on my genetics!)

Her genes revealed both a celiac gene and a gluten sensitive gene. What this tells me for sure is that both my husband and I possess gluten sensitive genes, that DD will pass a gluten senstive gene to her children and that she could be, or already is, celiac.

Dr Fine maintains (hypothesizes) that everyone with a celiac gene is gluten sensitive. I plan on keeping dd on a gluten-free diet.

Is further testing necessary?

Should I have gene tests performed on my asymptomatic children? The chances are pretty good that they too will possess gluten sensitive genes.

Does everyone with a gluten sensitive gene experence some form of gluten sensitivity?

This network is wonderful and has provided me with so much comfort and information as we walk this road. Thanks so much to the veterans who share their knowledge and experince with us newbies!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



CarlaB Enthusiast
Does everyone with a gluten sensitive gene experence some form of gluten sensitivity?

Not necessarily. There is only ONE gene that is not considered gluten sensitive, and it's only found in Asians (DQ4). If you and your child feel better gluten-free, then stay gluten-free. If you have doubts down the road, challenge and see how you react to gluten.

About 30% of the general public have a celiac gene, but only 1% ever develop celiac.

It's up to you whether you get everyone tested. I tested two symptomatic daughters with Enterolab (we don't have celiac genes). One was positive for gluten intolerance, one was negative.

The positive child challenged gluten last Christmas break and she decided that she never wanted to eat it again (she's 13). My oldest daughter was not tested, but tried the diet and her allergies went away. She does not eat gluten either. The rest of the family does (we have six kids).

earthmama Newbie

Thanks....my head has been spinning trying to figure all of this out. It's appealing to just do it and go gluten-free for the time being as we piece together this family puzzle. Great that you gave your teenagers the freedom to do their own experiment. Also nice to hear that some people do test negative through Enterolab...I was beginnng to think that everyone in the world had gs after reading about Dr Fine's work!

confused Community Regular
Thanks....my head has been spinning trying to figure all of this out. It's appealing to just do it and go gluten-free for the time being as we piece together this family puzzle. Great that you gave your teenagers the freedom to do their own experiment. Also nice to hear that some people do test negative through Enterolab...I was beginnng to think that everyone in the world had gs after reading about Dr Fine's work!

i was thinking for a bit that everyone tested positive to also thro entrolab. But then i got to thinking, of course most of us are positive, because we do not get tested just because we want to, We have has issues that make us think we are problems with gluten, so of course we are going to be positive. Im sure if more people tested that never had C or D, then there would be more negative people with gluten.

paula

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,118
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Cwbtex
    Newest Member
    Cwbtex
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Colleen H
      I did ... But aren't we going to be vitamin deficienct if we are not eating due to being sick ?? If the food we eat is gluten free and we have other sensitivities , how do we get out of the cycle??  Thank you 
    • Colleen H
      Anyone else get pins and needles. ??? Burning feeling ? Heat makes it so much worse 😔  Winter is here.  I had to lower my thermostat because I couldn't take that hot air feeling 😔  Hopefully it goes away soon     
    • trents
      I assume that you already know that genetic testing for celiac disease cannot be used to confirm a celiac diagnosis. About 40% of the general population has the genetic potential to develop celiac disease but only about 1% actually develop celiac disease. It can be used to rule out celiac disease with a high degree of confidence, however, in the case where the genetic testing is negative for the genes. Until and unless you are actually diagnosed with celiac disease I would not raise this as an issue with family. However, if you are diagnosed with celiac disease through blood antibody testing and/or endoscopy with positive biopsy I would suggest you encourage first degree relatives to also purse testing because there is a significant chance (somewhere betwee 10% and almost 50%, depending on which studies you reference) that they will also have or will develop active celiac disease. Often, there are symptoms are absent or very minor until damage to the small bowel lining or other body systems becomes significant so be prepared that they may blow you off. We call this "silent celiac disease". 
    • trents
      If you were off gluten for two months that would have been long enough to invalidate the celiac blood antibody testing. Many people make the same mistake. They experiment with the gluten free diet before seeking formal testing. Once you remove gluten from the diet the antibodies stop being produced and those that are already in circulation begin to be removed and often drop below detectable levels. To pursue valid testing for celiac disease you would need to resume gluten consumption equivalent to the amount found in 4-6 slices of wheat bread daily for at least two weeks, preferably longer. These are the most recent guidelines for the "gluten challenge". Without formal testing there is no way to distinguish between celiac disease and gluten sensitivity since their symptoms overlap. However, celiac disease is an autoimmune disorder that damages the small bowel lining, not true of gluten sensitivity. There is no test available for gluten sensitivity so celiac disease must first be ruled out. By the way, elevated liver enzymes was what led to my celiac diagnosis almost 25 years ago.
    • trents
      Then it does not seem to me that a gluten-related disorder is at the heart of your problems, unless that is, you have refractory celiac disease. But you did not answer my question about how long you had been eating gluten free before you had the blood antibody test for celiac disease done.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.