Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Alkaline Vs. Acid ?


UR Groovy

Recommended Posts

UR Groovy Explorer

Hi,

Wasn't sure where to put this topic. Maybe I should have stuck it in Gab?

I've been noticing something interesting about my dietary changes and that I do much better when I eat more alkaline than acidic foods. I happened upon some info about PH and would like to look into it further. I have never paid attention to this before, but would like to. Anybody out there who has any knowledge or experience with this? If anyone out there can direct me to a reputable website or maybe a book that could be helpful in learning about this, I would really appreciate it.

thanks,

k


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



zkat Apprentice

Paleo diet and the Paleo diet for athletes delves into PH levels of food and how they impact the body.

The website is Paleodiet.com

Human Blood is slightly alkaline with an optimal pH of 7.35-7.45. This site is helpful, but I will not swear by it's reputation. Open Original Shared Link

Centa Newbie

Hello,

I've about half-researched this one. I'll be interested to read what other members post on it.

An alternative medicine practitioner strongly recommended that I check my pH and if it was acid, to eat foods to make my pH more alkaline.

I did some reading about it on the net, but finally decided that the whole thing wasn't for me, even though the foods recommended are healthy ones and I should hope that they would be in my diet.

  • I not only tested my urine, with the recommended kit that I bought at Wild Oats (there were a couple different kinds available; I presume that they're available in other health foods stores, too), since that's what is supposed to be the indicator of body pH, or alimentary pH, but also tested everything that I could think of: my mouth, the tap water, the water in the bottled spring water that I drink. And I tested throughout the day. None of the sites tell you to do that, but since the whole premise is that your body, or its fluids, remain in a steady acidic or basic state, and that you are to eat different foods to re-set the pH state, obviously, I thought, I should have acidic urine 23 hours a day as well as that one morning hour of the test.

    In my case, my urine registered acid in the morning (they tell you to expect this, that this is the sign of trouble), but in an hour was within the range that the pro-pH sites were saying was normal. 23 hours of the day, the urine test seemed to be saying that my urine at least, was satisfactory as far as its pH was concerned.

What really encouraged me to drop the pH concerns at all were three other things, the first the most important to me.

  • I read a full-fledged, sample-based medical scientific paper that established that the pH of the GI tract was highly regular, was alkaline and that what you ate didn't affect that. I read far enough around that I started to see that in other articles based on sample gathering, too, by the traditional medical community (by that, I mean Western). None of the sites recommending eating certain foods to change the body pH made any remarks about the pH levels in different parts of the body...they would say that that morning pH test was an indicator of the whole body, or all its fluids.


  • (!) The sites disagree with each other as to what food items are acid, or make the bodily fluids (or the whole body) more acidic, and which foods make it more alkaline. And there were very big discrepancies in some of those lists. Now, I figured that if this thing about eating foods that change the pH is true, then through common experience of increased well-being, surely there ought to be a very high level of consistency in those lists of foods to eat or to not eat. Some foods were on all the lists, but there were enough foods that some were claiming to be "good" that other sites were claiming were "bad", to be avoided, that I really wasn't satisfied.


  • I discovered that I could fiddle with that morning pH test of my urine pretty easily. Like eating spinach the night before. If pH is systems-wide consistent, as these sites claim, it shouldn't be so easily manipulated, I thought.

So sum total, I don't know what to think about the claims that pH balancing shifting it toward alkaline will take away all the symptoms that are listed on those sites.

By the time I got through reading, I had seen many claims but no scientifically cross checked (through blind studies of different groups, or placebo versus non placebo, etc.) demonstration of the pH claims.

On the other hand, the foods they encourage you to eat are all healthy. I do think eating leafy greens, and other foods with high nutrient content will make anyone feel better, and for me it can be pretty dramatic: I can feel the effect in a couple days.

Sum total sum total, I'd need to see the pro-re-balance the body pH proponents deal directly with the medical studies that say that the pH of the GI tract is constant, and constantly alkaline. And particularly deal with the samples the medical studies present.

At this point I'm not convinced. If the major drive for a person with celiac sprue is to protect and heal the wellbeing of their GI tract, it didn't look to me like this pH rebalancing had much to offer, since the tract, in whatever state it is, is ALREADY alkaline, well within their claimed health range

:) I end up writing long posts sometimes. Sorry about that. I really would be interested, in a positive way, in hearing other people's research of the matter or testing in their own life

UR Groovy Explorer
...

By the time I got through reading, I had seen many claims but no scientifically cross checked (through blind studies of different groups, or placebo versus non placebo, etc.) demonstration of the pH claims.

On the other hand, the foods they encourage you to eat are all healthy. I do think eating leafy greens, and other foods with high nutrient content will make anyone feel better, and for me it can be pretty dramatic: I can feel the effect in a couple days.

...

Sum total sum total, I'd need to see the pro-re-balance the body pH proponents deal directly with the medical studies that say that the pH of the GI tract is constant, and constantly alkaline. And particularly deal with the samples the medical studies present.

At this point I'm not convinced.

...

I see what you're saying. Thanks for posting. And, thanks zkat.

I also was noticing a lot of conflicting info. on different websites with no real proof of anything, except that most of the foods that seem to be recommended (to increase alkalinity) are, in fact, good for your body anyway. It could be simply that because I've increased my veggie and good fat choices, I've been noticing that I'm feeling more energy and better in general.

Di-gfree Apprentice

I

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,036
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Cynthia Carlson
    Newest Member
    Cynthia Carlson
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Wends
       So sorry and sending well wishes. Replying from the UK. The NHS Coeliac Screen test is igAttg (including total igA). Your toddler is unlikely igA deficient with a titer of 22, as a positive test. When the igA anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies are raised above the reference value or positive, the endomysial test is performed. The TTG test is suggestive of coeliac disease BUT it can be transiently raised in type 1 diabetes, milk protein intolerance (common in early childhood. Can also cause malabsorption similar to coeliac disease). Can be slightly raised in other food sensitivity and food allergy and some other conditions. Whilst it is more specific for coeliac disease than the older anti-gliadin test the EMA test gives a high specificity for coeliac, but labour intensive test so is checked when the TTG shows positive as a further confirmation of a likelihood of Coeliac. Sometimes in children the anti-DGP (deaminated gliadin peptide) igA and IgG are performed as more likely positive in childhood coeliac disease. Unfortunately less used test these days in favour of ttg test. Though in research studies still utilised in addition to ttg and EMA. It usually follows that the EMA test will be positive in active coeliac disease later than the TTG shows positive. It may be classic transient antibodies with type 1. Likely what the Dr is counting on to not worry you or put your child through unnecessary testing. it also takes time as in weeks/months for antibodies to build up. The new guidelines by Gastroenterology Society say in children coeliac can be diagnosed without biopsy if the ttg is ten times the upper value. Plus positive EMA. EMA is usually positive after ttg. It’s a good sign it’s negative and the Doctor is doing the right thing to retest in three to six months. It’s the only way for a definite diagnosis and whether further testing is needed (endoscopy and biopsy). The Doctor is taking the wait and see approach as it is common in type 1s for the TTG antibodies to normalise too, and will be following standard practice. Return to your Dr sooner though, if there are signs of malabsorption and sudden deterioration. It wouldn’t be unreasonable to request another blood test sooner with symptoms of coeliac. It’s a tough one. Have you a family history? Re type 1, Dr Bernstein book invaluable, and type 1 grit online. If you’ve not heard of this elderly type 1 Dr (diagnosed as a child) and his story already you need to. Sadly he recently passed in his 90s still practicing and treating type 1s and 2s. Wealth of info on his diabetes university you tube channel. Was the first to start testing blood glucose numbers at home, he was an engineer and retrained as a Dr. He gave the information to the world and diabetics that its possible to have normal blood glucose numbers and prevent the complications. The law of small numbers. Hope this reply is helpful.  
    • trents
      Here is an article that gives an overview of all tests that can be used to detect celiac disease:    As you can see, the different tests vary in their degree of specificity and sensitivity. So, it is to be expected that if someone has celiac disease, not all the tests will be positive. Also notice that the tests break down into two large groups, IGA-based tests and IGG-based tests. There is also the EMA (Endomysial Antibodies) which is an older test and has largely been supplanted by he tTG-IGA which is less expensive to administer. So, when you report that the TTG score from your daughter's bloodwork is 22ku/l, we assume you are referring to the tTG-IGA test, which is the most popular test ordered by physicians when checking for celiac disease and considered to be the centerpiece test. However, you do not mention if there was a "total IGA" test run. Whenever the tTG-IGA is ordered, a total IGA should also be ordered to check for IGA deficiency. IGA deficiency will result in other IGA test scores, such as the tTG-IGA being artificially low, even falsely negative. This is especially true for young children. This is discussed in the article I linked. If your physician did not order total IGA test, this should have been done. Do you have a recourse for requesting such? I should also mention that you must not withdraw gluten from your toddler's diet until all testing for celiac disease is completed. Doing so would invalidate the testing.
    • Scott Adams
      I’m so sorry to hear about your toddler’s recent Type 1 diabetes diagnosis, and I understand how overwhelming it must feel to now be navigating possible celiac disease as well. The slightly elevated TTG antibodies (22 ku/L) with normal endomysial antibodies could indicate a few things—sometimes, mild elevations can occur due to factors other than celiac disease, such as recent infections or even Type 1 diabetes itself. However, the symptoms you’ve noticed (changes in stools, itching, and hair thinning) could potentially align with celiac disease, so it’s understandable why you’re concerned. Since the consultant wants to retest in 3–6 months, it may be because they’re assessing whether the antibody levels persist or increase, which would strengthen the case for further investigation (like a biopsy). In the meantime, if your daughter’s symptoms worsen or you feel uneasy waiting, it’s completely reasonable to ask for an earlier review or a referral to a pediatric gastroenterologist for further advice. Keeping a symptom diary until the next test might also help track any patterns. You’re doing a great job advocating for your little one—trust your instincts and don’t hesitate to push for more clarity if needed. Sending you lots of support.
    • mytype1diabetes
      Hi all, Posting from the UK.  My 2 year old was recently diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes. In the UK they routinely screen for coeliac disease. The test showed slightly elevated levels of TTG antibodies. The consultant wants to repeat these antibodies in 3-6 months time to determine clinical significance. In our letter it said "marginally elevated TTG antibodies (22ku/l), normal endomysial antibodies". I'm not exactly sure what this means, especially given one of the tests were within the normal range, and if we should be worried about the numbers. It is difficult to know if she has any "symptoms" but at the time she was diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes I noticed that her stools had changed. They are now probably a Type 6 on the Bristol stool chart. She seems to be quite itchy which is a recent thing and over the past week I have noticed some hair loss/thinning. I feel very worried and I'm not sure I can wait for her to be retested in 3-6 months time.  I'd appreciate any wisdom, advice or information you have. Thanks 🙏🏼
    • slkrav
      I was feeling really sick last week, for several days I kept thinking I was getting cross contamination. Typical symptoms like not sleeping well at night and waking up with widespread inflammation in all of my joints, foggy head and of course bowel issues. I had read the article recently that was talking about body products. I was starting to get depressed. I was showering and decided to read the ingredients in the products I've been using. It turns out that two of the ingredients in my conditioning hair mask contain GLUTEN. I felt really stupid for not checking before and I threw that away and also checked the ingredients of everything else I've been using. I've heard of skin issues from gluten containing body products, but this opens up a whole new way if being proactive. 
×
×
  • Create New...