Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Owen's Enterolab Results


Owen'sMom

Recommended Posts

Owen'sMom Rookie

I just wanted to share those results, his bloodwork and biopsy were negative this fall. We send in the sample for his celiac gene test. We also send in some stool samples to test for soy intolerance as he ran a lowgrade fever the whole time we trialed soymilk with him. Last year his gluten and casein sensitivity came back positive as well.

I will never put him on gluten ever again, even if his results were negative, we have a great positive dietary response and that is all that matters.

If you know your child does poorly with gluten in their diet and all tests come back negative do a gluten free trial or have them tested through enterolab, it is well worth it. No test is foolproof and you should follow your instincts

Gluten Sensitivity Gene Test

HLA-DQB1 Molecular analysis, Allele 1 0201

HLA-DQB1 Molecular analysis, Allele 2 0302

Serologic equivalent: HLA-DQ 2,3 (Subtype 2,8)

Soy Sensitivity Stool Test

Fecal Anti-Soy IgA 24 Units (Normal Range

Interpretation Of HLA-DQ Testing: HLA gene analysis reveals that you have two copies of the main genes that predispose to gluten sensitivity and celiac sprue, HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8. Having two copies of a gluten sensitive or celiac gene means that each of your parents, and all of your children (if you have them) will possess at least one copy of the gene. Two copies also means there is an even stronger predisposition to gluten sensitivity than having one gene and the resultant immunologic gluten sensitivity or celiac disease may be more severe.

Interpretation of Fecal Anti-Soy IgA: Levels of fecal IgA antibody to a food antigen greater than or equal to 10 are indicative of an immune reaction, and hence immunologic "sensitivity" to that food. For any elevated fecal antibody level, it is recommended to remove that food from your diet. Values less than 10 indicate there currently is minimal or no reaction to that food and hence, no direct evidence of food sensitivity to that specific food. However, because 1 in 500 people cannot make IgA at all, and rarely, some people can still have clinically significant reactions to a food antigen despite the lack of a significant antibody reaction (because the reactions primarily involve T cells), if you have an immune syndrome or symptoms associated with food sensitivity, it is recommended that you try a strict removal of suspect foods from your diet for up to 12 months despite a negative test.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ursa Major Collaborator

Good for you for going with your instincts! Too many mothers won't listen to their instincts when doctors don't agree. But we know our kids best.

I am sure Owen will thank you for feeling better.

ShayBraMom Apprentice

I'm osrry but also happy for you that you do have certain blacn and white proof to some extend. Your thorough post also answered my question I was going to aks myself. My son has DQ2 and my daughter has DQ2 and DQ 8! My gastro only looks for antibodies in my blood but not for the genes, so anturally I was curious, how it works with the Genes. Your explanation shows that my daughter with two genes MUST have inherited one from each of us and it didn't come from just one of us! Did I get that right?!

I hope all goes well and your son continues to do well on the diet! The biopsie to me is notoriously in accurate, simpky for the fact that so many kids have all the symptoms to Gluten and the positive response to the gluten-free diet, but not al of them simply had time to develope damage to the intestine yet!. With many it doesn't even occur until they are adults! Until then it's on them and their parents to fight for them selfs, no Taxdeductions nothing, and the damage is already done, a lot of them don't even know of Celiac desease and what it is!! they get trerated for all kinds of other stuuff but not witht he simplest one, meaning going glutenfree! Oh well, I'm counting a lot on the near future, on them coming up with a more accurate "Gold-Standard" and maybe some drops or pill to help prevent the symptoms of glutening if glutenend ect.!

big hugs and MNerry Christmas!

I just wanted to share those results, his bloodwork and biopsy were negative this fall. We send in the sample for his celiac gene test. We also send in some stool samples to test for soy intolerance as he ran a lowgrade fever the whole time we trialed soymilk with him. Last year his gluten and casein sensitivity came back positive as well.

I will never put him on gluten ever again, even if his results were negative, we have a great positive dietary response and that is all that matters.

If you know your child does poorly with gluten in their diet and all tests come back negative do a gluten free trial or have them tested through enterolab, it is well worth it. No test is foolproof and you should follow your instincts

Gluten Sensitivity Gene Test

HLA-DQB1 Molecular analysis, Allele 1 0201

HLA-DQB1 Molecular analysis, Allele 2 0302

Serologic equivalent: HLA-DQ 2,3 (Subtype 2,8)

Soy Sensitivity Stool Test

Fecal Anti-Soy IgA 24 Units (Normal Range

Interpretation Of HLA-DQ Testing: HLA gene analysis reveals that you have two copies of the main genes that predispose to gluten sensitivity and celiac sprue, HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8. Having two copies of a gluten sensitive or celiac gene means that each of your parents, and all of your children (if you have them) will possess at least one copy of the gene. Two copies also means there is an even stronger predisposition to gluten sensitivity than having one gene and the resultant immunologic gluten sensitivity or celiac disease may be more severe.

Interpretation of Fecal Anti-Soy IgA: Levels of fecal IgA antibody to a food antigen greater than or equal to 10 are indicative of an immune reaction, and hence immunologic "sensitivity" to that food. For any elevated fecal antibody level, it is recommended to remove that food from your diet. Values less than 10 indicate there currently is minimal or no reaction to that food and hence, no direct evidence of food sensitivity to that specific food. However, because 1 in 500 people cannot make IgA at all, and rarely, some people can still have clinically significant reactions to a food antigen despite the lack of a significant antibody reaction (because the reactions primarily involve T cells), if you have an immune syndrome or symptoms associated with food sensitivity, it is recommended that you try a strict removal of suspect foods from your diet for up to 12 months despite a negative test.

blueeyedmanda Community Regular

That's great you listened to your heart when you knew something wasn't right. Owen is very lucky :)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to Borky's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Gluten food test strips

    2. - Scott Adams replied to Midwesteaglesfan's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Going for upper endoscopy today

    3. - elisejunker44 commented on Scott Adams's article in Latest Research
      1

      Study Estimates the Costs of Delayed Celiac Disease Diagnosis (+Video)

    4. - Borky posted a topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Gluten food test strips


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,269
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    powergs03
    Newest Member
    powergs03
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Welcome to the forum! Do you mean this article, and if so, I don't think these are available yet.  
    • Scott Adams
      First of all, I want to wish you the very best of luck with your procedure today. It's completely understandable to feel a mix of apprehension and hope. Your proactiveness in researching and advocating for that endoscopy was incredibly smart; securing that formal diagnosis is crucial for both insurance and long-term health management. While it's natural to worry that those five gluten-free days could affect the results, your logic is spot-on—it's highly unlikely your intestines healed completely in that short time, and the fact that your joint pain and stomach issues have flared back up aggressively after reintroducing gluten is a very strong, and unfortunate, sign that the inflammation is indeed present and active. It's also very common for people to look back and connect dots, like your lifelong migraines, once a potential celiac diagnosis is on the table, as it's a systemic condition with many non-gastrointestinal symptoms. I truly hope this scope provides the clear answers you need to finally start on the right path to managing your health and finding lasting relief from the fatigue and pain. Safe travels for your drive, and here's hoping for a definitive answer and a brighter, healthier chapter ahead.
    • Scott Adams
    • Borky
      I just recently saw something on this.  Has anyone tried test strips?  Which brand is better?  Not sure how they really work and if they really do work.  Thank you, Nancy (aka Borky)
    • Wheatwacked
      Surge of information on benefits of vitamin D McCarthy has been employing these methods since February 2007, and patient acceptance has been high. He said he checks each patient’s 25(OH)D level and supplements to reach a target of 80 ng/mL in adults and children. Of the first 1,500 patients McCarthy tested, 40% began with vitamin D levels less than 20 ng/mL and 70% less than 35 ng/mL. Only 1% initially had values within his target range. According to McCarthy, his target range is based upon several factors: A lifeguard study that found vitamin D levels in the 70 ng/mL range up to 100 ng/mL (nature’s level) were associated with no adverse effects; Data in patients with breast cancer showing a reduction in the incidence of new cancer with postulated 0 point at 80 ng/mL; Colon cancer data showing a reduction in the incidence of new cancer (linear) with postulated 0 point at 75 ng/mL; More than 200 polymorphisms of the vitamin D receptor requiring higher D levels to attain same desired outcomes;
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.