Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

What Is The Law Exactly On Allergy Warnings


VioletBlue

Recommended Posts

VioletBlue Contributor

I made a mistake today. I'll probably pay for it shortly. I'm allergic to GMO corn as well as sunflower oil. So finding a corn chip that I can eat is an exercise in futility most of the time. I came across Cabo Tortilla Chips in the store. They're made from organic non GMO corn. Then I read down to the oil. Safflower oil, great. Somehow I missed the last ingredient on the list which was Soy Sauce. Who the hell puts soy sauce in corn chips?

I bought a package, came back to the office and ate a couple before I happened to read the label yet again and saw the last ingredient list.

It was my understanding that if a product does not clearly list WHEAT in the ingredient list, but there is indeed known wheat in the product it must have an allergy warning on it for wheat? This product had no warning. Had there been one THAT I would have seen.

I'm pissed at myself, but I'm also pissed at this company. Am I not understanding the labeling law?

Violet


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



happygirl Collaborator

They aren't required to put a warning. They are required to list it and not hide it.

Open Original Shared Link

I hope you don't feel too many side effects.

cruelshoes Enthusiast

Companies are not required to have an allergen warning per-se. They are, however, required to include the "big 8" somewhere on their ingredient statement if it is added to the product. The Big 8 allergens include milk, eggs, fish (e.g., bass, flounder, cod), Crustacean shellfish (e.g., crab, lobster, shrimp), tree nuts (e.g., almonds, walnuts, pecans), peanuts, wheat, and soybeans. Barley, rye and oats are not included in the big 8. They can do this one of 2 ways:

In the list of ingredients, put the name of the food source of the major food allergen in parenthesis after the common or usual name of the ingredient when that name does not already appear in the ingredient statement.

-or-

Immediately after or adjacent to the list of ingredients, put the word "Contains" followed by the name of the food for each of the major food allergens present in the food

Franceen Explorer

It IS possible that they used wheat-free Soy Sauce, since that does exist.

Most products that use soy sauce that contains wheat do something like this (Because of the law requiring they list wheat ingredients): "Soy Sauce (wheat, salt, soy, xxxx,xxxx)" with the ingredients contained within the soy sauce inside parentheses right afterwards.

I think that the law DOES require that they list, or make clearly visible, any ingredient that contains or is derived from wheat. SOooo, maybe it doesn't and you won't react!!!!! :D

VioletBlue Contributor

There is no warning on the package. It has a best by date of 02/22/08. How could this package possibly have been kicking around in the retail world for over two years??? If I remember right anything manufactured after 01/01/06 was required to have a warning?

Here is the response I got from them.

Thank you for your constructive email. Unfortunately, you must have

received one of our older bags that does not have the warning on it.

The labeling law does not pertain to our older product. All of our new

bags have an allergy warning that the product contains soy and wheat and

it is featured on our website as well. My roommate is actually a celiac

and we are sensitive to gluten and soy allergies.

Regarding the choice to put soy on our chips. I'm sorry you do not

think it is a good idea it is part of what makes our chips unique and

low in sodium. I don't think the world needs another plain chip or

Dorito. There are a number of people who do enjoy the chips otherwise

we would not make them. There are people with a lot of different tastes

out there and we can not please everybody.

Happy Holidays.

Christian Bunte

It IS possible that they used wheat-free Soy Sauce, since that does exist.

Most products that use soy sauce that contains wheat do something like this (Because of the law requiring they list wheat ingredients): "Soy Sauce (wheat, salt, soy, xxxx,xxxx)" with the ingredients contained within the soy sauce inside parentheses right afterwards.

I think that the law DOES require that they list, or make clearly visible, any ingredient that contains or is derived from wheat. SOooo, maybe it doesn't and you won't react!!!!! :D

VioletBlue Contributor

And yeah, it does contain wheat :( Fortunately my gastro reactions are mild compared to some. I'll probably feel it in my mood in the next couple days however. Sucks. Perhaps they just don't get it. They seem to think they have a warning on the package and on their website. While there is an ingredient list on the website, it makes no mention of the product specifically containing wheat. Now I know the difference, and most here know the difference; soy sauce usually contains wheat. But what if you don't know.

I made a mistake, I know that. But they could have improved my odds considerably with a very visible warning on the product somewhere near the ingredient list.

happygirl Collaborator

Thanks for the information about this company.....I'm sorry that you had to find it out for us though :(


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



tarnalberry Community Regular

it's not just when it was manufactured. companies are allowed to use up old stock of bags/boxes/packaging rather than trashing it all. a little added sticker on the ingredient list would be nice, though... :/

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,025
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Amari Love
    Newest Member
    Amari Love
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Your experience is both shocking and critically important for the community to hear, underscoring the terrifying reality that cross-contamination can extend into the most unexpected and invasive medical devices. It is absolutely devastating that you had to endure six months of sickness and ultimately sustain permanent vision loss because a doctor dismissed your legitimate, life-altering condition. Your relentless research and advocacy, from discovering the gluten in MMA acrylic to finding a compassionate prosthodontist, is a testament to your strength in a system that often fails celiac patients. While the scientific and medical consensus is that gluten cannot be absorbed through the skin or eyes (as the molecules are too large to pass through these barriers), your story highlights a terrifying gray area: what about a substance *permanently implanted inside the body*, where it could potentially shed microparticles or cause a localized immune reaction? Your powerful warning about acrylic lenses and the drastic difference with the silicone alternative is invaluable information. Thank you for sharing your harrowing journey and the specific, severe neurological symptoms you endure; it is a stark reminder that celiac is a systemic disease, and your advocacy is undoubtedly saving others from similar trauma.
    • Scott Adams
      Those are driving distance from me--I will try to check them out, thanks for sharing!
    • Scott Adams
      I am so sorry you're going through this bad experience--it's difficult when your own lived reality of cause and effect is dismissed by the very professionals meant to help you. You are absolutely right—your violent physical reactions are not "what you think," but undeniable data points, and it's a form of medical gaslighting to be told otherwise, especially when you have a positive HLA-DQ2 gene and a clear clinical picture. Since your current "celiac specialist" is not addressing the core issue or your related conditions like SIBO and chronic fatigue, it may be time for a strategic pivot. Instead of trying to "reprove" your celiac disease to unwilling ears, consider seeking out a new gastroenterologist or functional medicine doctor, and frame the conversation around managing the complications of a confirmed gluten-free diet for celiac disease. Go in and say, "I have celiac disease, am strictly gluten-free, but I am still suffering from these specific complications: SIBO, chronic fatigue, dermatological issues, and high blood pressure linked to pain. I need a partner to help me address these related conditions." This shifts the focus from a debate about your diagnosis to a collaborative plan for your current suffering, which is the help you truly need and deserve to work toward bouncing back.
    • NanCel
      Hello, no I had to have them re done and then used a liner over the top.  Many dentists are not aware of the celiac effects.  Best of luck.   There is other material, yet, very expensive.
    • sleuth
      He is not just a psychiatrist.  He is also a neuroscientist.  And yes, I have already read those studies.   I agree with benfotiamine.  This is short term while glutened/inflammation occurs.  As I had already mentioned, these symptoms no longer exist when this phase passes.  And yes, I know that celiac is a disease of malnutrition.  We are working with a naturopath.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.