Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Coeliac Disease Query


michael

Recommended Posts

michael Newbie

Hi.

I was blood-tested two years ago and was found to positive for antibodies to gluten. The hospital consultant said that no blood-test can ever be 100% accurate and that I should also have a gut biopsy taken. I had this done and was subsequently told by the specialist that the results were negative for celiac disease and that my symptoms all added up to IBS. I have had all kinds of symptoms over the years, sometimes acute bouts of diarrhoea, but predominately constipation. I sometimes get stomach cramps/bowel spasms/wind/nausea, which is usually followed by needing to go the toilet quite a few times. The gassy pain usually improves after that, although it usually takes a couple of days for the pain to have completely gone. Without wanting to go into too much detail, most of the times I empty my bowels, I pass hard, pellet-like stools, which quite often have mucus in them (well, I guess I did go into detail after all!).

I also suffer from anxiety/depression and have been taking 20mg anti-depressant daily now since the beginning of 2000, so I can understand why IBS was the end diagnosis. But I have since been told by someone from the Coeliac Disease Society that it is possible that my biopsy results were fine because the disease was in the early stages and therefore no damage had been done by then. She said I should ask for another blood test and if it is positive again, I should have another biopsy done. She also said that it was possible that my blood test results were wrong in the first place.

I haven`t changed my diet at all and still eat foods containing gluten.

I would appreciate it if anyone has any thoughts, suggestions, ideas.

Thanks in advance,

Michael


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



tom Contributor

I thought there was a difference in the set of anti-bodies for celiac vs gluten-intolerance.

There are ppl who frequent this forum who know the specifics. Or just search for IgA and/or some of the other terms.

There is a genetic test. Either the celiac genes are there or they're not.

If they are, you'll be glad u didn't wait for a positive biopsy. Your symptoms are bad enough already. I had what seemed like crippling tho sporadic cramping and spasms until i stopped all gluten.

lovegrov Collaborator

If you're still suffering I'd redo the tests. The blood tests are rarely false positive, meaning the odds are high that you DO have it. It could be you were in the early tages of intestinal damage, or even possible the damage was there but the samples the doctor took were from undamaged areas.

richard

Guest jhmom

If you decide to go through with the testing and they come back negative and you are still suffering you could always try the gluten free diet for a couple of months to see if you notice an improvement.

All of my blood test and biposies were negative then I was tested through Enterolab and received a positive dx. I started the gluten-free diet and could tell a difference within a few days.

tom Contributor

I too was a ton better w/in just a few days of 100% gluten-free.

Try it !

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - par18 replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      9

      Is it gluten?

    2. - SilkieFairy replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      6

      IBS-D vs Celiac

    3. - par18 replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      6

      IBS-D vs Celiac

    4. - trents replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      6

      IBS-D vs Celiac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,340
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Abbyyoung417
    Newest Member
    Abbyyoung417
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • par18
      Scott, I agree with everything you said except the term "false negative". It should be a "true negative" just plain negative. I actually looked up true/false negative/positive as it pertains to testing. The term "false negative" would be correct if you are positive (have anti-bodies) and the test did not pick them up. That would be a problem with the "test" itself. If you were gluten-free and got tested, you more than likely would test "true" negative or just negative. This means that the gluten-free diet is working and no anti-bodies should be present. I know it sounds confusing and if you don't agree feel free to respond. 
    • SilkieFairy
      I realized it is actually important to get an official diagnosis because then insurance can cover bone density testing and other lab work to see if any further damage has been done because of it. Also, if hospitalized for whatever reason, I have the right to gluten-free food if I am officially celiac. I guess it gives me some legal protections. Plus, I have 4 kids, and I really want to know. If I really do have it then they may have increased risk. 
    • par18
      Been off this forum for years. Is it that important that you get an official diagnosis of something? It appears like you had a trigger (wheat, gluten, whatever) and removing it has resolved your symptom. I can't speak for you, but I had known what my trigger was (gluten) years before my diagnosis I would just stay gluten-free and get on with my symptom free condition. I was diagnosed over 20 years ago and have been symptom free only excluding wheat, rye and barley. I tolerate all naturally gluten free whole foods including things like beans which actually helps to form the stools. 
    • trents
      No coincidence. Recent revisions to gluten challenge guidelines call for the daily consumption of at least 10g of gluten (about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for a minimum of 3 weeks. If possible, I would extend that two weeks to ensure valid testing.
    • SilkieFairy
      Thank you both for the replies. I decided to bring back gluten so I can do the blood test. Today is Day #2 of the Challenge. Yesterday I had about 3 slices of whole wheat bread and I woke up with urgent diarrhea this morning. It was orange, sandy and had the distinctive smell that I did not have when I was briefly gluten free. I don't know if it's a coincidence, but the brain fog is back and I feel very tired.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.