Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Looking For Advice On Which Enterolab Test(s) To Do


HouseKat

Recommended Posts

HouseKat Apprentice

This message was posted: Dec 14 2007, 04:32 PM

So, I just got back from the GI doc. He said to me, "You definitely do not have celiac disease." He bases this on test results - which state clearly, "Results do not exclude a diagnosis of celiac disease" - taken when I had been off gluten for three months and back on for only four days.

Here are the results:

AGA IgG: 1.5U/ml

AGA IgA: 0.8 U/ml

TTG IgA: 0.6 U/ml

EMA IgA: negative

Total IgA: 202 mg/dl

Alleles detected: HLA DQA 1*05 detected

DQ Genotype: DQ2-, DQ8-

I went gluten-free on Labor Day and the ignorant GI doc announced me "definitely not celiac" after I was on gluten for only four days before he did the blood panel. (Note: Even though the date on the fax showed that the results had arrived nearly two weeks earlier, it was obvious that when he pulled them out of my file it was the very first time he was looking at them. Shouldn't he have looked at them earlier?!)

I would now like to do some Enterolab testing, but I'm not sure which test or tests would be best to do at this point. Would the Stool Test for Gluten Sensitivity be sufficient? Or should I go for the Gluten Sensitivity Stool and Gene Panel Complete? (I could do the $99 test immediately, I'd have to save up a bit for the big package of tests.)

Kate


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ursa Major Collaborator

It appears that you have the 'official' celiac disease genes, not just one, but both. So, you don't need the gene test any more, which is included in the big package at Enterolab. Why don't you call them to see if they can give you a deal on the big package, if you exclude the gene test? Because it really is the best test.

Otherwise I would at this point go for the $99.00 one for now.

And for your GI to tell you that you definitely can't have celiac disease just shows you that he is an ignorant idiot.

Do you have a copy of the test results? If not, go and get one and drop him, he doesn't know what he is doing.

HouseKat Apprentice
Do you have a copy of the test results? If not, go and get one and drop him, he doesn't know what he is doing.

I do have a copy of the results; when he gave me his bogus diagnosis I asked for a copy because I knew I'd likely be going elsewhere for a second opinion.

Once he had dismissed celiac he started talking about wanting to do tests for microscopic colitis and I B S!

Kate

CMCM Rising Star

I'd had a celiac blood test (negative) but I was having a lot of symptoms AND I hadn't been eating much gluten for a long time, so I wasn't surprised about the negative blood test. I wasn't about to start eating tons of gluten again, so I decided on the Enterolab full battery of tests. I found it to be extremely informative because I learned which genes I have (yes, a celiac gene), I found out I was reacting, and I found out I had a very low malabsorption score, which I've interpreted to mean I probably had no appreciable villi damage...yet. I also learned I was casein sensitive. This is more information than any "doctor" has been able to provide, and it pointed me in the direction I needed to go. I'd really suggest the full panel for you. In the long run, it's cheaper than doing a bunch of tests individually.

So I will never know whether I had active celiac disease, whether I had villi damage. But it doesn't matter. Given my genetic predisposition, given the unpleasant symptoms I had, I now know I should never eat gluten again.

You can learn this for yourself, too. You don't need the stamp of approval of a clueless doctor!

hathor Contributor

I'm not sure you do have the celiac genes, although I don't know I'm reading the results properly. There are minus marks after DQ2 and DQ8 -- could that mean you do NOT have them? It also says DQ1 is detected and mentions nothing else in that category.

There is no need to redo the genetic testing. Just get the doctor to explain what the test results mean. Do you have double DQ1 (no laughing matter according to this double DQ1 person B) ) or what? There is research tying DQ1 to neurological problems from gluten and plenty of us have gastro problems too.

Is your doctor discounting celiac (or gluten intolerance in general) due to the antibody levels or the genetic testing, do you know? Some doctors don't think you can have a problem with gluten if you don't have DQ2 or DQ8, but this is incorrect.

I think the other Enterolab tests would be useful to get. You might even go for the casein and other substance testing as well to figure out if you should be avoiding those things, if you can swing the cost.

HouseKat Apprentice
I'm not sure you do have the celiac genes, although I don't know I'm reading the results properly. There are minus marks after DQ2 and DQ8 -- could that mean you do NOT have them? It also says DQ1 is detected and mentions nothing else in that category.

There is no need to redo the genetic testing. Just get the doctor to explain what the test results mean. Do you have double DQ1 (no laughing matter according to this double DQ1 person B) ) or what? There is research tying DQ1 to neurological problems from gluten and plenty of us have gastro problems too.

Is your doctor discounting celiac (or gluten intolerance in general) due to the antibody levels or the genetic testing, do you know? Some doctors don't think you can have a problem with gluten if you don't have DQ2 or DQ8, but this is incorrect.

I think the other Enterolab tests would be useful to get. You might even go for the casein and other substance testing as well to figure out if you should be avoiding those things, if you can swing the cost.

Hathor,

Yes, those are negative signs after the DQ2 and DQ8 - I copied the info exactly as it appeared on the results sheet. I find it interesting that I did test positive for DQ1 but the GI doc completely ignored that result, zeroing in on the other two negatives as proof positive that I could not possibly have celiac.

The doctor also concluded that I do not have celiac based on the low antibody levels - he's completely ignorant about the need to be on gluten for 4-6 weeks before testing. I thought about challenging him on it, but just couldn't be bothered. I'm never going back to him again, so he's not my problem anymore.

When I go to see my PCP next and we discuss the results I will go armed with facts and research to show him why the GI's diagnosis is suspect. If I've been able to do Enterolab testing by then I'll bring those results too.

Kate

Sailing Girl Apprentice

Hi Kate,

If you can afford it (and none of this is cheap!), I'd definitely get the Enterolab gene test as well as the other testing. It might turn out that you've got DQ7 or DQ9 along with your DQ1. Your doc didn't screen for those because they're not recognized as Celiac genes in the U.S., just in other (more enlightened) countries.

Good luck!

Jane


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Ginsou Explorer

I'd go for the full Enterolab panel also. I got my (positive) results, and still had some problems and had additional tests done. Positive for casein and soy!! A complete surprise.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - knitty kitty replied to Jmartes71's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      12

      My only proof

    2. - NanceK replied to Jmartes71's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      12

      My only proof

    3. - knitty kitty replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      39

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - trents replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      39

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      39

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,367
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Pauline14
    Newest Member
    Pauline14
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      You're right, doctors usually only test Vitamin D and B12.  Both are really important, but they're not good indicators of deficiencies in the other B vitamins.  Our bodies are able to store Vitamin B12 and Vitamin D in the liver for up to a year or longer.  The other B vitamins can only be stored for much shorter periods of time.  Pyridoxine B 6 can be stored for several months, but the others only a month or two at the longest.  Thiamine stores can be depleted in as little as three days.  There's no correlation between B12 levels and the other B vitamins' levels.  Blood tests can't measure the amount of vitamins stored inside cells where they are used.  There's disagreement as to what optimal vitamin levels are.  The Recommended Daily Allowance is based on the minimum daily amount needed to prevent disease set back in the forties when people ate a totally different diet and gruesome experiments were done on people.  Folate  requirements had to be updated in the nineties after spina bifida increased and synthetic folic acid was mandated to be added to grain products.  Vitamin D requirements have been updated only in the past few years.   Doctors aren't required to take as many hours of nutritional education as in the past.  They're educated in learning institutions funded by pharmaceutical corporations.  Natural substances like vitamins can't be patented, so there's more money to be made prescribing pharmaceuticals than vitamins.   Also, look into the Autoimmune Protocol Diet, developed by Dr. Sarah Ballantyne, a Celiac herself.  Her book The Paleo Approach has been most helpful to me.  You're very welcome.  I'm glad I can help you around some stumbling blocks while on this journey.    Keep me posted on your progress!  Best wishes! P.S.  interesting reading: Thiamine, gastrointestinal beriberi and acetylcholine signaling https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12014454/
    • NanceK
      So interesting that you stated you had sub clinical vitamin deficiencies. When I was first diagnosed with celiac disease (silent), the vitamin levels my doctor did test for were mostly within normal range (lower end) with the exception of vitamin D. I believe he tested D, B12, magnesium, and iron.  I wondered how it was possible that I had celiac disease without being deficient in everything!  I’m wondering now if I have subclinical vitamin deficiencies as well, because even though I remain gluten free, I struggle with insomnia, low energy, body aches, etc.  It’s truly frustrating when you stay true to the gluten-free diet, yet feel fatigued most days. I’ll definitely try the B-complex, and the Benfotiamine again, and will keep you posted. Thanks once again!
    • knitty kitty
      Segments of the protein Casein are the same as segments of the protein strands of gluten, the 33-mer segment.   The cow's body builds that Casein protein.  It doesn't come from wheat.   Casein can trigger the same reaction as being exposed to gluten in some people.   This is not a dairy allergy (IGE mediated response).  It is not lactose intolerance.  
    • trents
      Wheatwacked, what exactly did you intend when you stated that wheat is incorporated into the milk of cows fed wheat? Obviously, the gluten would be broken down by digestion and is too large a molecule anyway to cross the intestinal membrane and get into the bloodstream of the cow. What is it from the wheat that you are saying becomes incorporated into the milk protein?
    • Scott Adams
      Wheat in cow feed would not equal gluten in the milk, @Wheatwacked, please back up extraordinary claims like this with some scientific backing, as I've never heard that cow's milk could contain gluten due to what the cow eats.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.