Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood Testing While Gluten Free


Tranquillity

Recommended Posts

Tranquillity Rookie

First off, I know that you need to eat gluten to have accurate results. Thing is, I had NO idea my doctor had ordered celiac tests, until I had a needle in my arm and gazed at the papers! I've been gluten free since 2007-10-30, which is 2 months and a couple of days.

I'm not sure which tests were ordered, but lets give him the benefit of the doubt and suppose it's the full "celiac panel". All I know is that it was quite a few tubes, although other (non-celiac) tests were also ordered. The only test I know for sure was in was the tTG antibodies.

Will the results look good no matter what, or will they still look less-than-perfect IF I'm celiac? I really doubt I am at this point, though.

Thanks in advance :)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



gfp Enthusiast

Well it's not so easy..

The difficulties are two fold...

The simplest is that the 'normal' ranges are used and these have a wide range... your antibodies will drop off over time and this is pretty individual, not only for the person but also the time in your life and other health issues etc.

The results will be compared to this norm so a 'slightly elevated' might be significant given the amount of time you are gluten-free but MD's prefer nice categories.

aikiducky Apprentice

Some people who had a high ttg at diagnosis still have a higher than normal ttg when they have follow up testing six months or so into the diet, so I guess there's chance that you still could have some positives now. It's impossible to say of course since we don't know what your numbers would have been when you were still on gluten. I'd say in any case if anything is even a little bit positive it should be taken seriously. What are you planning to do, are you going to stay gluten free no matter what, or are you thinking that you might not need to after all?

Pauliina

Tranquillity Rookie
Some people who had a high ttg at diagnosis still have a higher than normal ttg when they have follow up testing six months or so into the diet, so I guess there's chance that you still could have some positives now. It's impossible to say of course since we don't know what your numbers would have been when you were still on gluten. I'd say in any case if anything is even a little bit positive it should be taken seriously. What are you planning to do, are you going to stay gluten free no matter what, or are you thinking that you might not need to after all?

Pauliina

I haven't noticed *any* change whatsoever on the trial diet, so if the blood test is ("completely") negative, I'll go back on gluten to check for reactions. If there is none, I'll most likely stay on.

Celiac wasn't very likely in the first place (long story, but lets just say that my symptoms don't really point to a stomach/digestive problem at all), but I figured a trial wouldn't hurt. :)

Offthegrid Explorer

My family doctor ordered a blood test that came back positive. The gastro I was referred to ordered a different blood test over a month later that came back negative. The gastro said my family doc's test wasn't used any more.

But, bottom line, I get sick when I eat gluten. I did a gluten test, and it's painfully obvious that I am gluten intolerant. And when I accidentally eat it, I get sick even when I don't *know* I've eaten gluten. Most recent example is that three weeks ago I drank tea that I didn't realize had barley in it.

All my brother's blood tests and an endoscopy came back negative. He also clearly can't eat gluten.

So, I personally wouldn't put too much stock in a negative blood test. Do a gluten trial after you get the results if they are negative.

Gwen B Rookie
My family doctor ordered a blood test that came back positive. The gastro I was referred to ordered a different blood test over a month later that came back negative. The gastro said my family doc's test wasn't used any more.

But, bottom line, I get sick when I eat gluten. I did a gluten test, and it's painfully obvious that I am gluten intolerant. And when I accidentally eat it, I get sick even when I don't *know* I've eaten gluten. Most recent example is that three weeks ago I drank tea that I didn't realize had barley in it.

All my brother's blood tests and an endoscopy came back negative. He also clearly can't eat gluten.

So, I personally wouldn't put too much stock in a negative blood test. Do a gluten trial after you get the results if they are negative.

My doctor ordered a Tissue Transglutiminase IGA Serum test a year ago (whatever that is) and the result was a low negative. I was told that I might be low on B12 so to take supplements and this eased my dizzyiness and fatigue for a while but after a year of escalating gastric woes I decided I didn't have time to be sick over the holidays and have been gluten free since Nov 1 07 and dairy free about a month. I have been much better with only a couple of bad days usually when I found out I had had something glutinous or cassein.

One time was particularly bad on Dec 24 I had a supposedly gluten free meal in a restaurant which claims to have gluten free menus. I developed severe hives and swelling so bad my chin disappeared into my neck and had to get shots at the emergency room to counter the histamine reaction, not to mention the usual stomache ache I got later that day.

It makes me somewhat apprehensive of trying gluten again to see if I am coeliac. I had skin allergy testing which only tested posative for soy and hayfever related stuff, not wheat. but I was sure I had had a lot of wheat in that meal and I subsequently spoke to the restaurant manager who appologised and conceded it may have been possible that I had been given the regular soy sauce not the gluten free kind.

The allergist doctor also conceded that he didn't know what caused the hives and that although the IGA result made it 'extremely unlikely' that I was coeliac, if I felt better on a gluten-free diet then I may well be reacting to a protein in wheat or some other gluten culprit.

Should I try it again?

slee Apprentice

I subsequently spoke to the restaurant manager who appologised and conceded it may have been possible that I had been given the regular soy sauce not the gluten free kind.

Wouldn't the soy sauce have caused you a problem anyways since you are allergic to soy??


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Gwen B Rookie
I subsequently spoke to the restaurant manager who appologised and conceded it may have been possible that I had been given the regular soy sauce not the gluten free kind.

Wouldn't the soy sauce have caused you a problem anyways since you are allergic to soy??

May be but usually it just furs my mouth up if I drink soy milk. I've had soy yogurt several times since and not had a reaction. I was told that heating/cooking soy milk might destroy the protein to which I react.

May be there was the combination of wheat and soy which triggered soy. I definately felt bad afterward like I have done in the past when I've been glutened.

I've asked my doctor for a (proper) blood allergy test which is supposed to be more accaurate.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,742
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    MistyMoon
    Newest Member
    MistyMoon
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Theresa2407
      Maybe you have a low  intolerance to Wheat.   Rye, Barley and Malt are the gluten in Celiac disease.  It has always been stated Wheat and Gluten, not just a Wheat intolerance.  Barley will keep me in bed for (2) weeks.  Gut, Migrains, Brain fog, Diahrea.  It is miserable.  And when I was a toddler the doctor would give me a malt medicine because I always had Anemia and did not grow.  Boy was he off.  But at that time the US didn't know anyone about Celiac.  This was the 1940s and 50s.  I had my first episode at 9 months and did not get a diagnosis until I was 50.  My immune system was so shot before being diagnoised, so now I live with the consequences of it. I was so upset when Manufacturers didn't want to label their products so they added barley to the product.  It was mostly the cereal industry.  3 of my favorite cereals were excluded because of this. Malt gives me a bad Gut reaction.
    • Gigi2025
      Thanks much Scott.  Well said, and heeded.   I don't have Celiac, which is fortunate.
    • Scott Adams
      Do you have the results of your endoscopy? Did you do a celiac disease blood panel before that?  Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      It is odd that your Tissue Transglutaminase (TTG) IgA level has bounced from the "inconclusive" range (7.9, 9.8) down to a negative level (5.3), only to climb back up near the positive threshold. This inconsistency, coupled with your ongoing symptoms of malabsorption and specific nutrient deficiencies, is a strong clinical indicator that warrants a more thorough investigation than a simple "satisfactory" sign-off. A negative blood test does not definitively rule out celiac disease, especially with such variable numbers and a classic symptomatic picture. You are absolutely right to seek a second opinion and push for a referral to a gastroenterologist. A biopsy remains the gold standard for a reason, and advocating for one is the most direct path to getting the answers you need to finally address the root cause of your suffering. Here is more info about how to do a gluten challenge for a celiac disease blood panel, or for an endoscopy: and this recent study recommends 4-6 slices of wheat bread per day:    
    • Scott Adams
      There is a distinction between gluten itself and the other chemicals and processing methods involved in modern food production. Your experience in Italy and Greece, contrasted with your reactions in the U.S., provides powerful anecdotal evidence that the problem, for some people, may not be the wheat, but the additives like potassium bromate and the industrial processing it undergoes here. The point about bromines displacing iodine and disrupting thyroid function is a significant one, explaining a potential biological mechanism for why such additives could cause systemic health issues that mimic gluten sensitivity. It's both alarming and insightful to consider that the very "watchdog" agencies meant to protect us are allowing practices banned in many other developed countries. Seeking out European flour and your caution about the high-carb, potentially diabeticgenic nature of many gluten-free products are excellent practical takeaways from your research, but I just want to mention--if you have celiac disease you need to avoid all wheat, including all wheat and gluten in Europe.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.