Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Confused On Results


Liviesmom

Recommended Posts

Liviesmom Newbie

Hello - this is my first venture to this site. My 3 yo daughter got her celiacs results and we can't get to the GI for 2 mos. As mentioned, her total IgA was 59 (range for age group 41-395). But, alleles were detected in the genetic test, giving her a higher risk for celiacs. She has chronic diahera (or just mush, I guess). I know the GI will want to scope her, but in the meantime, should I start going gluten free?? She has some symptoms, but isn't testing positive, except for having the gene. The lab report says no serological markers were detected, but that this test does not rule out a diagnosis of celiacs. Any words of advice would be great.

Thanks,

Karen


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



aikiducky Apprentice

If you want a positive biopsy, which will give you an official diagnosis, you need to keep her on gluten until the biopsy is done.

Pauliina

happygirl Collaborator
Hello - this is my first venture to this site. My 3 yo daughter got her celiacs results and we can't get to the GI for 2 mos. As mentioned, her total IgA was 59 (range for age group 41-395). But, alleles were detected in the genetic test, giving her a higher risk for celiacs. She has chronic diahera (or just mush, I guess). I know the GI will want to scope her, but in the meantime, should I start going gluten free?? She has some symptoms, but isn't testing positive, except for having the gene. The lab report says no serological markers were detected, but that this test does not rule out a diagnosis of celiacs. Any words of advice would be great.

Thanks,

Karen

Hi Karen! Welcome to the board.

A total IgA doesn't diagnose Celiac, but tells if she has an IgA deficiency (which can affect the accuracy of the other Celiac blood tests).

Did she have the other blood tests run: Open Original Shared Link

Do NOT go gluten free until the testing that you choose to have is completed. The testing measures the damage done by gluten and the antibodies your body produces. If you stop eating gluten, and are a Celiac, your body begins to heal and you will test negative. That is the last thing you want---a false negative!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,233
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    JGBJ
    Newest Member
    JGBJ
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      How long have you been strictly gluten free? Certainly, it would be good to look into vitamin and mineral deficiencies and supplementation. The B vitamins, magnesium and D3 are all very important to neurological health. Unfortunately, it can be difficult to reverse gluten-induced neurological damage damage if it has gone on for a long time. 
    • nataliallano
      Thanks Trents I'm strict with my gluten-free diet now. I just don't feel any better. I'm going to get tested for vitamins and minerals to see if I need some supplements. For sure I got some damage that doctors call Menier's and the only way they treat it is with medicine that does damage my body more than it helps.   
    • Zuma888
      Thank you Scott for your helpful response! Based on this, would you say someone who is on a gluten-free diet - but not strict about cross-contamination and occasional cheating - and tests negative for tTg-IgA while having normal total IgA is not likely to have celiac, even if they have been 'gluten-free' for years?
    • Scott Adams
      That’s a really insightful observation about antibody testing and the gluten challenge! You’re absolutely right that antibody levels can remain elevated for months or even years after going gluten-free, especially if there’s ongoing cross-contamination or occasional slip-ups. The immune system doesn’t reset overnight—it can take time for antibodies like tTG-IgA to normalize, which is why many doctors recommend waiting at least 6–12 months of strict gluten-free eating before retesting. For someone who’s been gluten-free for less than two years or hasn’t been meticulous about avoiding cross-contact, there’s absolutely a chance they’d still test positive, since even small amounts of gluten can keep antibodies elevated. This is partly why the gluten challenge (where you eat gluten before testing) exists—it’s designed to provoke a measurable immune response in people who’ve been gluten-free long enough for antibodies to drop. But you raise a great point: the challenge isn’t perfect, and false negatives can happen if the timing or amount of gluten isn’t sufficient to trigger a strong antibody response. This is why diagnosis often combines antibody tests with other tools like genetic testing or endoscopy. Your question highlights just how nuanced celiac testing can be! For people with celiac disease hidden gluten in their diets is the main cause of elevated Tissue Transglutaminase IgA Antibodies (tTG-IgA), but there are other conditions, including cow's milk/casein intolerance, that can also cause this, and here is an article about the other possible causes:      
    • Betsy Crum
      Thank you for your response! I have considered starting a food diary in the past, I suppose this is as good a time as any to start.  
×
×
  • Create New...