Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gluten-free Vs. No Gluten Ingredients


Petasatus

Recommended Posts

Petasatus Newbie

I was just diagnosed on Monday and am trying to figure things out and am hoping someone can provide some insight. I am trying to understand how much I should be concerned about cross-contamination, both at home and outside the home. When looking at lists on-line, such as Trader Joe's No Gluten list, I am finding some companies stating No Gluten Ingredients instead of Gluten Free. Is this something I need to be concerned about? Is there a way to determine what is considered safe, if produced in a facility that also produces products that contain gluten? Thank you in advance for any information.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



missy'smom Collaborator

I initially didn't worry about this, in part, because I used very few products at first. I didn't try to substitute everything but just ate what was naturally gluten-free. Over time I have added in and tried more products and have come to see that I'm very sensitive and have clearly reacted to products that were labeled gluten-free but produced on shared equipment. It said on the box that the equipment was cleaned according to allergen control procedures and that they were tested to be under 5ppm. When I contacted the manufacturer, they told me that another one of their products was made in a dedicated(gluten-free) facility. So, I stick to that one. It is a personal decision where you want to draw the line. I personally feel that there is a greater risk of cross-contamination with dry products if they are made on equipment or in a facility that is shared with wheat. When they say "no gluten ingredients" then you don't really know if it is in a shared facility or on shared equipment. You could call or e-mail the manufacturer to ask them about it. Many have shared their experiences with reacting to various gluten-free products so there is some risk involved, even if it is slight. I may not react to the same one that someone else does but the cummulative picture tells me that there is some risk. We all have to decide for ourselves if it is worth it. You can always choose to buy only products made by dedicated gluten-free companies in dedicted gluten-free facilities. It's limiting but it's safe.

Petasatus Newbie

Thank you very much for all the information and sharing your personal experience, very much appreciated!

  • 2 weeks later...
SharonF Contributor

I tend to read labels very carefully and avoid products with any kind of gluten in them; however, I don't seek out totally gluten free dedicated line foods. This may be because my reactions haven't been as extreme as others have.

You will become an expert at reading labels in short order. It's probably easiest to start off with totally gluten free products and add in others as you feel comfortable.

constantly questioning Newbie

As far as cross contamination at home there are many tips on this website. Personally, if something with gluten "touches" my stuff I consider it contaminated. If I am cooking a gluten free dish and a non-gluten free dish I can't use the same spoon in both. I have to use two different sets of utensils. Dishes, cups, silverware should be washed in hot soapy water or I personally prefer it to come out of the dishwasher before I consider it safe to use. For example, I went out to eat last week and I couldn't figure out what made me so sick...I remembered the deep fried onion rings that were on my food when it arrived. Silly me pushed them off, didn't see any crumbs and ate the food. Well, I was sick within minutes of eating. I am still learning too.

psawyer Proficient

Keep in mind that, today, any label that discloses possible contamination sources is totally voluntary. There is no law or regulation requiring it, so the absence of such a disclosure on a label does not mean anything.

Do you ever eat in a restaurant? If so, the kitchen is a shared facility and the dishes and cutlery are shared equipment.

Do you have any gluten-containing products in your house, perhaps for other family members? If so, then your house is a shared facility. Do they have their own dedicated dishes, cutlery and dishwasher? if not, then, well, you get the point.

When I see these notices, I consider the type of product and the likelihood of a problem, while keeping in mind that the next product over may be just as risky while not telling me.

When I see "may contain traces of ..." I worry more, but still realize that this may be nothing more than a CYA statement for a shared facility.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,684
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Betty Siebert
    Newest Member
    Betty Siebert
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.