Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Pamela's Wheat Free Bread Mix


stolly

Recommended Posts

stolly Collaborator

Pamela's was my second attempt at making bread from a mix.

First was Gluten Free Pantry Favorite Sandwich Bread...flavor of GFP was ok, a little metalic or an aftertaste, but the look and texture were great. I used a 9x5 silicon loaf pan and it expanded...the loaf was HUGE.

Now for the Pamela's mix...I baked it in the oven (not a bread machine). Used my stand mixer with the whisk attachment (instructions say not to use a dough hook...should I have used the paddle attachment?). Poured it into the recommended 8x4 pan (I used metal). I let it rest for 60 minutes on the counter while covered with plastic wrap (maybe that is where I went wrong? I did that b/c Gluten Free Pantry's sandwich bread mix recommended that). Baked it for 65 minutes, but covered it with foil the last 10 b/c it was getting really brown. When I took it out, it sounded hollow when I tapped on it. The finished product is...really dry, very oddly shaped (the top is wider than the bottom and lopsided, really tall on one side), and the inside is a little undercooked...flavor is pretty good though (but texture is really not right).

I like the flavor of Pamela's better, but the texture of GFP was much better. Any suggestions? Should I use a 9x5 pan for Pamela's? The 8x4 pan seemed so small. If so, should I shorten the baking time for the bigger pan? And is metal, glass, or silicon better? Or do you think I made a mistake with the mixing, resting, or baking?

I welcome any suggestions!! Thanks in advance!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



rpf1007 Rookie

Hi there-

I'm not sure I can really offer too much advice as I have only baked a few loaves. I have done two GFP and one Pamela's. I had the same problem as you did with Pamela's- way too doughy/sticky/undercooked for me (which totally grossed me out). I haven't really found that the GFP had much of a taste at all and the texture was the best so far, both times I made it. I also tried the Bob's redmill mix and I had the same problem as Pamela's- doughy/sticky. Both of those were much harder to slice. I decided to stick with the GFP for now as it is quicker than the other two...seems to work...slices well...no doughy texture. If you figure it out- let us know. I would be interested too!

Rachel

HudsonValleyGal Newbie

I love the flavor of the Pamela's mix, and am finding that buying it in bulk from Lame Advertisement is my most affordable way to get gluten-free bread.

I, too, have had several loaves turn out lopsided, where one side of the pan rose faster and higher than the other. Those loaves were too brown, too. Those happened when I followed the package directions exactly.

What seems to work a bit better for me is this: I prepare the mix as instructed (yes, using the whisk attachment). I place the dough in an oiled, metal, nonstick bread pan, and spread it as evenly as possible. I cover it with plastic wrap (which I've sprayed with canola oil, to keep it from sticking to the dough). Then I place the dough in (or on top of) a warm oven (I alternate turning the oven on "warm" and turning it back off, to keep it warm enough for the dough to rise but not so warm that it cooks or the plastic wrap melts). The heat helps the dough to rise. That seems to take 40-55 minutes. In my limited experience with this mix, it seems that if I get the dough to rise prior to baking, it does so pretty evenly (where if I follow the package directions and just have the dough sit, not rise, prior to baking, it ends up having a really uneven top). I bake the bread as directed, except that I cover the top with foil after the first 25-30 minutes of baking, at which point it's already nicely browned.

Have you tried using the Pamela's mix for dinner rolls? They're heavenly. Just put the bread dough in nonstick muffin tins, and smooth and round the tops as much as you can with a spatula. That's the first thing I used Pamela's bread mix for, and after that I was hooked.

celiac-mommy Collaborator

I bake 2 of these loaves a week (Pamela's). I follow the ingredient directions for oven (little different than the bread machine recipe), I always use the paddle attachment on my Kitchenaid (the whisk might put in too much air causing it to fall....) I put in my metal loaf pan (sprayed with Pam) and rest it on top of a heating pad set to medium for an hour. Then I bake for 10 minutes longer than what the pkg says, so about 75 minutes. The last loaf I made, I used another technique posted on here--when I preheated the oven, I put a cast iron skillet 1/2 full of water on the bottom rack and left it in the oven with the bread on the rack directly above (I have convection oven...) I've never had a loaf of bread raise that much--it actually hit the top of my oven!! It was the lightest, best cooked loaf I've made yet. I also buy in bulk from a/m/a/z/o/n.

stolly Collaborator

Thank you for your tips! Did you use a 8x4 or 9x5 loaf pan??

cruelshoes Enthusiast

I bake 2 leaves a week of the Pamela's mix too. I use a 9x5 glass pan and the paddle attachment on my kitchenaid. I would not use the whisk attachment. I think it would be gummed up too much in the wires and not get mixed enough. I think an 8x4 pan would be too small. The thing that threw me about the Pamelas mix at first is that it does not rise very much outside the oven. The bulk of the rising of the mix is during baking (it's the kind of yeast they use). I think the bag even refers to it as a rest instead of a rise. I rise the bread on the top of my preheating oven. The ideal ambient temperature for rising bread is 75 - 80 degrees. So I used my instant read thermometer to find the place on the top of my oven that was that temp. For me it is on top of the right front burner. I do not find that the Pamela's mix needs to be covered with plastic wrap while rising. The reason some recipes do that is because our gluten-free flours lack structure. When rising, the saran wrap is intended to keep everything together so it rises up and not out over the sides of the pan. But since the Pamela's mix isn't intended to rise over the top of the pad before you put it in the oven, it isn't really necessary. I don't know if it would hurt, but I'm not convinced it would help either.

Maybe if your bread was shorter on one side than the other it was because one side of the pan was warmer than the other. You know how one of the burners on the stove is the vent for the oven? Maybe the taller side was next to that (warmer ambient temp) and the shorter side was not. If your bread was browning too much on top, you could check the height of the racks in your oven. I always use the rack on the middle setting. Otherwise it gets too close to the top element and gets browner faster. Pamelas mix bakes for exactly 65 minutes in my oven at 325.

Hope this helps!

lonewolf Collaborator

I bake the Pamela's bread a really weird way, but it works great. I mix it up right before going to bed with cold water. Then I put it into a 1.5 qt oval casserole dish and put it in the oven on time bake for 70 minutes, with the light on. It "rests" overnight. The oven comes on at 5:40 and at 6:50 the bread is ready, just as I am getting up. The kids love having warm bread for breakfast and they also slice some up, cool it, and make sandwiches for school.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    2. - Roses8721 posted a topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      0

      gluten-free Oatmeal

    3. - Roses8721 replied to Roses8721's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      8

      GI DX celiac despite neg serology and no biopsy

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Ginger38's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      5

      Shingles - Could It Be Related to Gluten/ Celiac

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      Challenges eating gluten before biopsy


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,473
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kelly Hannon
    Newest Member
    Kelly Hannon
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):




  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Certainly, it would b wise to have a gene test done if your physician is open to it as it would provide some more data to understand what's going on. But keep in mind that the genetic test for celiac disease cannot be used as to diagnose celiac disease, only to establish the potential to develop active celiac disease. About 40% of the general population possess one or both of the primary genes known to be associated with the development of active celiac disease but only about 1% of the population actually develop active celiac disease. So, the gene test is an effective "rule out" tool but not an effective diagnostic tool.
    • Roses8721
      Had Quaker gluten-free oatmeal last night and my stomach is a mess today. NO flu but def stomach stuff. Anyone else?
    • Roses8721
      So you would be good with the diagnosis and not worry to check genetics etc etc? Appreciate your words!
    • Scott Adams
      As recommended by @Flash1970, you may want to get this: https://www.amazon.com/Curist-Lidocaine-Maximum-Strength-Topical/dp/B09DN7GR14/
    • Scott Adams
      For those who will likely remain gluten-free for life anyway due to well-known symptoms they have when eating gluten, my general advice is to ignore any doctors who push to go through a gluten challenge to get a formal diagnosis--and this is especially true for those who have severe symptoms when they eat gluten. It can take months, or even years to recover from such a challenge, so why do this if you already know that gluten is the culprit and you won't be eating it anyway?  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS--but those in this group will usually have negative tests, or at best, elevated antibodies that don't reach the level of official positive. Unfortunately test results for celiac disease are not always definitive, and many errors can be made when doing an endoscopy for celiac disease, and they can happen in many ways, for example not collecting the samples in the right areas, not collecting enough samples, or not interpreting the results properly and giving a Marsh score.  Many biopsy results can also be borderline, where there may be certain damage that could be associated with celiac disease, but it just doesn't quite reach the level necessary to make a formal diagnosis. The same is true for blood test results. Over the last 10 years or so a new "Weak Positive" range has been created by many labs for antibody results, which can simply lead to confusion (some doctors apparently believe that this means the patient can decide if they want more testing or to go gluten-free). There is no "Weak Negative" category, for example. Many patients are not told to eat gluten daily, lots of it, for the 6-8 week period leading up to their blood test, nor asked whether or not they've been eating gluten. Some patients even report to their doctors that they've been gluten-free for weeks or months before their blood tests, yet their doctors incorrectly say nothing to them about how this can affect their test, and create false negative results. Many people are not routinely given a total IGA blood test when doing a blood screening, which can lead to false negative interpretations if the patient has low IGA. We've seen on this forum many times that some doctors who are not fully up on how interpret the blood test results can tell patients that the don't need to follow a gluten-free diet or get more testing because only 1 of the 2 or 3 tests done in their panel is positive (wrong!), and the other 1 or 2 tests are negative.  Dermatologists often don't know how to do a proper skin biopsy for dermatitis herpetiformis, and when they do it wrongly their patient will continue to suffer with terrible DH itching, and all the risks associated with celiac disease. For many, the DH rash is the only presentation of celiac disease. These patients may end up on strong prescriptions for life to control their itching which also may have many negative side effects, for example Dapsone. Unfortunately many people will continue to suffer needlessly and eat gluten due to these errors in performing or interpreting celiac disease tests, but luckily some will find out about non-celiac gluten sensitivity on their own and go gluten-free and recover from their symptoms. Consider yourself lucky if you've figured out that gluten is the source of your health issues, and you've gone gluten-free, because many people will never figure this out.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.