Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Producing 'gliadin Free' Wheat


irish daveyboy

Recommended Posts

irish daveyboy Community Regular

Projects are under way at both Washington State University and Oregon State University

to develop transgenic wheat varieties that are safe for those who suffer from coeliac disease.

.

This is presently only at the research stage, reality is some way off.

But at least the US wheat producers are aware they are losing out on sales to

3 Million diagnosed and millions more un-diagnosed Americans and are doing something about it!!

.

Open Original Shared Link

.

Open Original Shared Link

.

Open Original Shared Link

.

Best Regards,

David


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

To me this seems stupid, they should just concentrate on increasing the use of safe alternatives. The reason why I say this is that as far as I know it is the gluten that gives the wheat the qualities that they want in wheat. If they manage to manipulate the genes is it really still wheat? And what if there is more to celiac reactions than just a reaction to the gliadin? I know I won't volunteer to try it.

Jestgar Rising Star
Projects are under way at both Washington State University and Oregon State University

to develop transgenic wheat varieties that are safe for those who suffer from coeliac disease.

.

This is presently only at the research stage, reality is some way off.

But at least the US wheat producers are aware they are losing out on sales to

3 Million diagnosed and millions more un-diagnosed Americans and are doing something about it!!

.

Just pointing out that university research is basic science and not associated with the wheat growers. The OSU people are asking the wheat growers for money to continue. The WSU people got ~800,000 for 4 years. Sounds like a lot, but it's almost nothing in terms of funding a lab.

I agree with RWG, what's the point?

irish daveyboy Community Regular
To me this seems stupid, they should just concentrate on increasing the use of safe alternatives. The reason why I say this is that as far as I know it is the gluten that gives the wheat the qualities that they want in wheat. If they manage to manipulate the genes is it really still wheat? And what if there is more to celiac reactions than just a reaction to the gliadin? I know I won't volunteer to try it.

.

Hi RWG and jestgar,

Today's Wheat was 'Mutated' over tens of thousands of years,

Mutating in reverse (Genetically) so that it doesn't have the high 'Gluten' content might not be a bad thing!!

.

The following links may make you feel you're back in college !!

.

Open Original Shared Link

.

Open Original Shared Link

.

Open Original Shared Link

.

Best Regards,

David

2kids4me Contributor

Part of what I understood from the article is that IF they can genetically alter the wheat to remove gliadins - it will still retain the binding quality that wheat is used for...and as they state:

gluten is also used as a filler or binder in many additional food and non-food items, such as deli-meats, licorice, medicines, vitamins and even the adhesive on stamps and envelopes.

if they can come up with this magic wheat - then manufacturers could use it instead and more products would be "safe" for celiacs,,

But IMHO :

1) manufacturers have always chosen the cheapest product and the genetically altered wheat - if it was ever marketed , would be expensive

2) growing, harvesting and processing would encounter the same issue as OATS do now - contamination along the way from gluten crops. Would require a dedicated facility = $$$

3) I am always leary about genetically altering mother nature - be it cloning cattle or modifying plants

I agree with :

they should just concentrate on increasing the use of safe alternatives.

Wheat may have been "mutated" over the centuries but it has always had gluten in it.

What disease will be created when people react to the new and improved wheat? The gliadin will be altered/missing or whatever but a new protein will be introduced...

Just my 2 cents

Sandy

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,792
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Ann Marie 50
    Newest Member
    Ann Marie 50
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • nanny marley
    • Scott Adams
      Very interesting--thanks for sharing that study!
    • Scott Adams
      Let us know how things turn out, and good luck!
    • Wends
      https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joim.70025 Very recent (September 2025) Finland study may be of interest. Borderline negative and low positive ant-TTG, with negative and positive EMA tests in patients diagnosed with Celiac Disease.
    • nanny marley
      Thanks for the list too makes me realise why I still get symptoms after cutting gluten , all that reading has just made sense to why I'm still struggling , thankyou Scott Adams very insightful , I've been baking to and there is xanthum gum in the flour , I understand now why I still have issues with that too, and ive had to cut dairy also , i had a terrible flare few months ago and my throat also was very irritable and I had sinuses issues all makes sence 👍
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.