Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Negative Biopsy - Why Am I Disappointed?


muffins

Recommended Posts

muffins Newbie

Why am I disappointed to have normal biopsy results? Or am I just pissed at my doctor who urged me to go on a gluten free diet before I had a definitive diagnosis? After I had already done the gluten-free diet for about two months, I was referred to a GI doctor. The GI doctor didn


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



*lee-lee* Enthusiast

i'm curious...what prompted the trips to the doctor if you didn't have any symptoms?

muffins Newbie
i'm curious...what prompted the trips to the doctor if you didn't have any symptoms?

I went to a different GP because I had symptoms of fatigue and depression, which I figured were thyroid related. I was diagnosed with Graves disease in 1999, had a thyroidectomy in 2001 (no thyroid now), and was unhappy with my current thyroid medication. I was fed up with my endocrinologist so I found the name of a GP who also practices alternative medicine. He prescribes natural dessicated thyroid meds which I wanted to try. The majority of doctors will only prescribe the synthetic thyroid drugs. While I had my consult with this doctor, some symptom I mentioned prompted him to suggest testing for celiac along with the other bloodwork I was to have done. I have since read that there is a connection between Graves disease & celiac.

*lee-lee* Enthusiast

did they run a celiac panel before you were referred to the GI (and before you started gluten-free)? that would have shown elevated antibodies if you do have Celiac.

ShayFL Enthusiast

Seems you have 2 choices: Keep eating gluten for the 2 - 3 months and stay depressed and tired. But go for a gold star dx.

Or eat gluten-free for those 2 - 3 months and see if your fatigue and depression deosnt lift. You may find that other things improve as well (that you were not aware of were a problem because the fatigue and depression can take over).

There is a strong connection between Celiac and other auto-immune diseases like Graves and Hashi's.

muffins Newbie

Yes, I had an elevated tTG level of 99. This test was done after showing a positive result for some other antibody test (not sure what it was).

Tough choices. It should be a no-brainer. I hate switching back & forth between the two diets. It makes it difficult to determine what effect it is having. Is it possible to have a false positive because I have Graves? Or is the tTG level too elevated from the norm?

ShayFL Enthusiast

You should have a full Celiac panel done. Some say that it could be elevated due to other auto-immune diseases and that is why you should also have EMA:

Diagnosis of celiac disease

There is no test yet which is definitively diagnostic of celiac disease. Relief of symptoms or reversion of an abnormal intestinal biopsy to normal on a gluten-free diet is the most convincing evidence that an individual has celiac disease or gluten sensitivity. Intestinal biopsies as discussed above show characteristic findings compatible with celiac disease but are obtained just as often to exclude other intestinal conditions, most importantly infection, which can have a clinical presentation similar to celiac disease.

The first serologic marker reported to be of use in the diagnosis of celiac disease was the IgG class antigliadin antibody (AGA). Though sensitive, this antibody is also found in other diseases and is therefore not specific for celiac disease. IgA class AGA is more specific, however about 2 % of patients with celiac disease have selective IgA deficiency. A positive IgG and IgA AGA gives a reported sensitivity of 96 % to100 % and specificity of 96 % to 97 %. If only the IgG AGA is positive an evaluation for selective IgA deficiency should be undertaken. Antireticulin antibodies (ARA) have also been reported in individuals with celiac disease, but are nonspecific. IgG ARA is relatively useless, but IgA ARA has a high sensitivity and specificity in adults (97 % and 98 % respectively). In children these values are much lower. Recently two antibodies, IgA class antiendomysial antibody (EMA) and human jejunal antibody (JAB), have been identified which are highly sensitive and specific for active celiac disease (100 % sensitivity and specificity reported in one study). The one best characterized is the EMA, an antibody against endomysium reticulin fibers. In adult studies, EMA was only found in patients with active celiac disease and not other diseases. The test is less powerful in children as EMAs have been detected in other childhood diseases. The more important limitation of EMAs in children is the reported fall in sensitivity observed in children with celiac disease less than 2 years old. Even the EMA and JAB antibody tests in adults are not fool proof as they may not be positive in individuals with celiac disease and IgA deficiency.

A panel of these antibodies seems to be most useful in the diagnosis of celiac disease. A combination of IgG AGA, IgA AGA and EMA have a reported positive predictive value of 99.3 % when all were positive and a negative predictive value of 99.6 % when all were negative. These antibodies tend to lessen or disappear when individuals are maintained on a gluten-free diet. Antibody testing is important in screening individuals who are at risk for having celiac disease but have no symptomatology, in individuals with atypical symptoms or extraintestinal manifestations of celiac disease, and in individuals with presumed celiac disease who fail to respond to a gluten-free diet. Patients with postive antibody tests must undergo small intestinal biopsy to confirm the diagnosis and assess the degree of mucosal involvement.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular

I'm not sure what blood tests you had done for celiac, but it seems to me that if they DID indicate that you are making antibodies to gluten, that is enough of an answer right there.

Healthy, normal people do not make antibodies to gluten.

If you do have celiac, or even gluten intolerance, then you might have a malabsorption problem (very common, almost universal amongst celiacs)--this would explain why your thyroid meds weren't working, as you might not have been properly absorbing them!

I'm guessing that the natural dessicated thyroid med absorbs far more quickly than the Synthroid, which would be why so many celiacs seem to do better with it.

In my own experience, I did NOT do well with Synthroid until I went off gluten, and then it was amazing how much better I did! I was able to decrease my dosage by 50% over several months (dosage indicated by bloodwork).

Of course, that's only my experience, and everyone is different.

So, like Shay says, you can either go for the offical MD Dx, or try the diet immediately and see if the tiredness and other symptoms improve.

I'd vote for the diet. You can jump through all the medical hoops, have a totally negative diagnosis--yet still be celiac.

Besides, it's a healthy diet.

muffins Newbie

I should find out what the other blood test was for. The GP did say that it was positive and confirmed the results of the tTG test. According to him, gluten is toxic and that should be reason enough to eliminate it from my diet. Whereas, the GI doctor is reluctant to diagnose celiac, or even recommend a gluten-free diet, without the positive biopsy. Why are doctors so reluctant to put a label on it? What harm can it do? Fear that a patient might sue for subjecting them to a gluten-free diet? Or is conventional medicine to blame? I really don

hawaiimama Apprentice

I sent you a private message.

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular

My big additional expense is TIME, but not as much as I would have thought.

I make breads, pizzas, cookies, cakes, etc. from scratch.

I use an adaptation of the gluten-free flax skillet bread (on this website), and my kids love it. I make it in mini 4" cake pans, which makes them perfectly hamburger bun size, and I make a dozen at a time. I make bread roughly twice a week. We use corn tortillas as wraps, too.

I make rice in a rice cooker, 5 or 6 cups at a time.

We don't go out to eat hardly at all now--maybe once every month or two--HUGE savings there!

The pizzas I make from corn tortillas--HUGE savings there, too. And we eat less bread and fewer cookies than we used to, so all in all, hopefully we're healthier, too.

I know how you feel, though--I cried for 2 days when I was diagnosed. But it really was easier than I'd anticipated--and MUCH tastier!

muffins Newbie

I did try a couple gluten-free products which were quite tasty. It takes some getting used to the different texture though.

I'll have to try that flax bread recipe. I expect I'll want to do my own baking after I get more familiar with the gluten-free ingredients.

I've decided to go on a gluten binge for the next 2 weeks. Then see how I feel and decide if I want to bother with more tests. I think I may have some symptoms now that I didn't attribute to gluten before. After just two days, I been noticing more of a buddha belly. Hopefully, I won't burst at the seams after two weeks.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,213
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    MogwaiStripe
    Newest Member
    MogwaiStripe
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.