Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Eating For Performance Vs. Weight Loss


munchkinette

Recommended Posts

munchkinette Collaborator

I've been working out A LOT lately. I joined a boot camp program in the mornings, and I'm planning to run a 12K in a few weeks. I'm trying really hard to lose weight, so I've been cutting calories.

I lost about 5 lbs in July, I haven't lost anything since the middle of August. I was totally gluten-free during that time. Then I got glutened about two weeks ago. I haven't been able to lose at all for nearly a month. I noticed that a few people in the Diet and Weight Loss threads said that people who have malabsorption issues go into starvation mode when cutting calories, so their metabolisms slow. Could this be happening?

I guess my question for the athletes is: Has anyone decided to stop dieting and start eating for performance in order to lose weight and get in shape? There are articles in Runner's World about having to pick building muscle vs. diet because both don't work at the same time. Thoughts?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Laurad- Apprentice

You might be right that you've stopped losing weight because of being glutened; I don't know. But I do know that muscle weighs more than fat, so if you are building muscle with your new workout program, it is more than likely that you are still shedding fat (and turning it into muscle) even though the scale says you aren't getting any lighter. ...And that's ok because you're body is still getting more toned. B)

Personally, I eat for performance as opposed to weight maintenance: a lot of protein for muscles, fluids for hydration, etc.

lorka150 Collaborator

Yes, definitely focus on performance vs. weight loss. It is quite likely you're not eating enough if you're second guessing if you are are. I can help you out if you want; I'm a personal trainer.

munchkinette Collaborator

Thanks for the offer. I just talked to my brother, who is also a trainer and gluten-free. (He's not as sensitive as I am, so I can't always just ask him with the food.)

He seemed to think I was overdoing it and needed more of a break, and more calories. That's so frustrating though- I feel like the fitness is so slow for me already, so upping calories seems counter-intuitive. I decided to try it for a couple of weeks though, at least until running my 12K.

lorka150 Collaborator

Good luck with your training! Feel free to PM me if you want a woman's point of view (although I am sure your brother is well-versed in all areas). Again, good luck!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,159
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Greymo
    Newest Member
    Greymo
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Let me hasten to add that if you will be undergoing an endoscopy/biopsy, it is critical that you do not begin efforts to reduce gluten beforehand. Doing so will render the results invalid as it will allow the small bowel lining to heal and, therefore, obscure the damage done by celiac disease which is what the biopsy is looking for.
    • Scott Adams
      This article, and the comments below it, may be helpful:    
    • Scott Adams
      That’s a really tough situation. A few key points: as mentioned, a gluten challenge does require daily gluten for several weeks to make blood tests meaningful, but negative tests after limited exposure aren’t reliable. Dermatitis herpetiformis can also be tricky to diagnose unless the biopsy is taken from normal-looking skin next to a lesion. Some people with celiac or DH don’t react every time they’re exposed, so lack of symptoms doesn’t rule it out. Given your history and family cancer risk, this is something I’d strongly discuss with a celiac-experienced gastroenterologist or dermatologist before attempting a challenge on your own, so risks and benefits are clearly weighed.
    • Greymo
      https://celiac.org/glutenexposuremarkers/    yes, two hours after accidents ingesting gluten I am vomiting and then diarrhea- then exhaustion and a headache. see the article above- There is research that shows our reactions.
    • trents
      Concerning the EMA positive result, the EMA was the original blood test developed to detect celiac disease and has largely been replaced by the tTG-IGA which has a similar reliability confidence but is much less expensive to run. Yes, a positive EMA is very strong evidence of celiac disease but not foolproof. In the UK, a tTG-IGA score that is 10x normal or greater will often result in foregoing the endoscopy/biopsy. Weaker positives on the tTG-IGA still trigger the endoscopy/biopsy. That protocol is being considered in the US but is not yet in place.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.