Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help Please


HebrewRose

Recommended Posts

HebrewRose Newbie

I recently had my antibody levels tested and all but my gliaden IgG were normal. IgG was 52 (ref 0-10). My family doctor tells me he's fairly sure I have celiac given my family history of the disease as well as my symptoms.

I'm concerned though because when I asked for a referal to a GI specialist for a biopsy, he told me that a biopsy was unneccessary and that a simple colonoscopy would do. He also told me to go ahead and begin a gluten-free regime. My GI appointment isn't for another month and a half, and I'm concerned that if I go gluten-free, my body will already be healing and will give inaccurate results. I have no idea what to do about this.

Any suggestions?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa Mentor

Your doctor is ill informed. You are smart to question him. This is the test that you should have:

Anti-gliadin antibodies (AGA) both IgA and IgG

Anti-endomysial antibodies (EMA) - IgA

Anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (tTG) - IgA

Total IgA level.

Get a copy of your result and post then here. A colonoscopy will not detect Celiac, but it might be wise to have a base line test, especially if you have had issues. That is done through the small intestines with an endoscopy/biopsy, to test for damage due to Celiac, although, no current testing is conclusive.

It is important, should you pursue and endoscopy exam, you must remain on a full gluten diet. If you can accept a diagnosis, based on positive dietary results and your family history, you can begin the diet immediately. Many people here have taken that road.

We can't tell you what to do, only to arm you with facts to make your own decision.

HebrewRose Newbie
Your doctor is ill informed. You are smart to question him. This is the test that you should have:

Anti-gliadin antibodies (AGA) both IgA and IgG

Anti-endomysial antibodies (EMA) - IgA

Anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (tTG) - IgA

Total IgA level.

Get a copy of your result and post then here. A colonoscopy will not detect Celiac, but it might be wise to have a base line test, especially if you have had issues. That is done through the small intestines with an endoscopy/biopsy, to test for damage due to Celiac, although, no current testing is conclusive.

It is important, should you pursue and endoscopy exam, you must remain on a full gluten diet. If you can accept a diagnosis, based on positive dietary results and your family history, you can begin the diet immediately. Many people here have taken that road.

We can't tell you what to do, only to arm you with facts to make your own decision.

Thanks. Those are the tests I had, and like I said the only one that wasn't normal was the anti-gliadin IgG. But I was kind of suspicious about the colonoscopy. I appreciate your advice a lot though.

sbj Rookie

Best of luck getting a proper and accurate diagnosis. Sounds to me as if your intern is not well informed.

My opinion only and no substitute for a real doctor, you don't have celiac but might have a food allergy, Crohn's, or some other auto-immune disease. It therefore makes sense to have a colonososcopy (depends on your symptoms). Since you almost for sure do NOT have celiac you do not need a biopsy via endoscopy to confirm that. If you still think you have celiac - which is not likely given your test results - you can avoid the endoscopy and instead try a genetic test. If you're negative for the genes then you really have no possibility to acquire celiac.

This is the typical situation and I'm sure others would disagree. There are always exceptions but it makes sense, to me, to start out with the more likely stuff.

When IgA levels are normal (anti-endomysial IgA and anti-tissue transglutaminase IgA) this means that your body is not attacking itself because of gluten and you therefore don't have celiac. BUT, your IgG level is abnormal. This means that your body might be attacking gluten (as opposed to itself).

"Many normal individuals without CELIAC DISEASE will have an elevated antigliadin IgG, causing much confusion among physicians. If a patient

sbj Rookie

By the way:

"he told me that a biopsy was unneccessary and that a simple colonoscopy would do."

A biopsy via endoscopy is the the procedure that is relatively simple and mostly painless - at least it was for me.

A colonoscopy, on the other hand, is a very difficult thing to go through. It is by no means 'simple.' It takes all day to prepare, can't eat for a day plus, you are under a local anesthetic, you need a driver, and you have to sign releases in case you are injured. It's not simple and it's not easy.

If I were you I would maintain a normal diet until all of this testing is complete. I would not start the gluten-free diet unless I had to, or unless you really want to even if you don't have celiac. Your intern is probably recommending you stop eating gluten foods because of your family history and symptoms and NOT because of your test results. Remember, the high IgG levels don't necessarily mean you have a problem with wheat (the G in IgG does not stand for gluten). It could be some other food entirely causing your high IgG levels (or even a virus). You might still be able to enjoy wheat products! I'm hoping you can.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - asaT replied to Scott Adams's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      45

      Supplements for those Diagnosed with Celiac Disease

    2. - par18 replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      9

      Is it gluten?

    3. - SilkieFairy replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      6

      IBS-D vs Celiac

    4. - par18 replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      6

      IBS-D vs Celiac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,340
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Abbyyoung417
    Newest Member
    Abbyyoung417
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • asaT
      I was undiagnosed for decades. My ferritin when checked in 2003 was 3. It never went above 10 in the next 20 years. I was just told to "take iron". I finally requested the TTgIgA test in 2023 when I was well and truly done with the chronic fatigue and feeling awful. My numbers were off the charts on the whole panel.  they offered me an endoscopic biopsy 3 months later, but that i would need to continue eating gluten for it to be accurate. so i quit eating gluten and my intestine had healed by the time i had the biopsy (i'm guessing??). Why else would my TTgIgA be so high if not celiacs? Anyway, your ferritin will rise as your intestine heals and take HEME iron (brand 4 arrows). I took 20mg of this with vitamin c and lactoferrin and my ferritin went up, now sits around 35.  you will feel dramatically better getting your ferritin up, and you can do it orally with the right supplements. I wouldn't get an infusion, you will get as good or better results taking heme iron/vc/lf.  
    • par18
      Scott, I agree with everything you said except the term "false negative". It should be a "true negative" just plain negative. I actually looked up true/false negative/positive as it pertains to testing. The term "false negative" would be correct if you are positive (have anti-bodies) and the test did not pick them up. That would be a problem with the "test" itself. If you were gluten-free and got tested, you more than likely would test "true" negative or just negative. This means that the gluten-free diet is working and no anti-bodies should be present. I know it sounds confusing and if you don't agree feel free to respond. 
    • SilkieFairy
      I realized it is actually important to get an official diagnosis because then insurance can cover bone density testing and other lab work to see if any further damage has been done because of it. Also, if hospitalized for whatever reason, I have the right to gluten-free food if I am officially celiac. I guess it gives me some legal protections. Plus, I have 4 kids, and I really want to know. If I really do have it then they may have increased risk. 
    • par18
      Been off this forum for years. Is it that important that you get an official diagnosis of something? It appears like you had a trigger (wheat, gluten, whatever) and removing it has resolved your symptom. I can't speak for you, but I had known what my trigger was (gluten) years before my diagnosis I would just stay gluten-free and get on with my symptom free condition. I was diagnosed over 20 years ago and have been symptom free only excluding wheat, rye and barley. I tolerate all naturally gluten free whole foods including things like beans which actually helps to form the stools. 
    • trents
      No coincidence. Recent revisions to gluten challenge guidelines call for the daily consumption of at least 10g of gluten (about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for a minimum of 3 weeks. If possible, I would extend that two weeks to ensure valid testing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.