Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

When Blood Results Are Negative But Still Have Symptoms


TracyB

Recommended Posts

TracyB Apprentice

I have asked my doctor to send me for a biopsy regardless of the blood results - I just want to put this all to rest. She agreed but there is no telling how long an appt. will take. There is somebody on this board in the same city in Canada as I am and even with a positive blood result it was 5 mos. before she was able to get in with a gastro. The likelihood is that somebody like me will be put at the bottom of the list for appts.

But my question is - if the range for the TTG is 0.0-20.0 and my reading was 2.8 - at which point do you question it's validity? I would say that is a fairly low reading. I do have symptoms and always have (since 3 yrs. old) but have always been told it's IBS. And it could be - that would be better than celiac of course - except for wanting to know WHY I feel like I do.

BUT, I feel very unwell all the time. Having D or C is not fun. But it's the headaches and body aches and fatigue that are getting to me now.

I'd love to go gluten-free but until I know when this biopsy might occur I'm reluctant to do that. I figure if I have to wait many months, than I'll try gluten free for a few months and see how I feel - then still have time to go back on gluten before the biopsy.

I guess I'd like to know if my range is so low that I needn't even entertain the idea of celiac. I was thinking that if it was something like 18 or 19 than I'd be more inclined to believe I MIGHT have celiac.

What do you think?

TracyB


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa Mentor

Open Original Shared Link

[edit] Diagnostic use

Serology for anti-tTG antibodies has superseded older serological tests (anti-endomysium, anti-gliadin and anti-reticulin) and has a strong sensitivity (99%) and specificity (>90%) for identifying coeliac disease. Modern anti-tTG assays rely on a human recombinant protein as an antigen[7]

lizard00 Enthusiast

Did they test your total IgA serum? That would be a good number to have, if you have it.

If you could post your results here, we can help you.

TracyB Apprentice
Did they test your total IgA serum? That would be a good number to have, if you have it.

If you could post your results here, we can help you.

Here's the results - I think everything that was needed was run...?

IgA T. Transglutaminase - Celiac disease is negative and the patient is IgA sufficient. This screen is only accurate if the patient receives a gluten containing diet. False negative screens rarely occur. If you still suspect celiac disease, the patient should be referred to a gastroenterologist for further evaluation prior to initiating a gluten-free diet.

Tissue 2.8 (0.0 - 20.0) kU/L

Transglutaminase IgA

Immunoglobulin A 2.46 (0.60 - 4.20) g/L

Immunoglobulin G 10.13 (6.8 - 18.00) g/L

Immunoglobulin M 0.48 (0.40 - 3.00) g/L

Ferritin 33 (10-290) ug/L

Thyroid Stimulating Hormone 1.49 (0.20 - 6.00) mU/L

Tracy B.

cyberprof Enthusiast

Hi Tracy,

Regarding the chances of having celiac with your results, I can only offer my experience. I found out that I had celiac from a biopsy first, with the blood test - which was negative - done afterward. So you can definitely have celiac but have nothing zip nada show up in your blood work. There are others here with similar results. My doctor said that since I didn't have much damage, the level wasn't high enough to show in the blood work. I "only" had Marsh Level 1 damage, and did not have "blunted" villi. I've heard, anecdotally, that there are some here that had totally flat villi and still didn't test positive on blood work.

My opinion is that the blood tests are not very sensitive. If the blood work is positive, there are few false negatives. The reverse is not true.

Of course, I'm not a doctor and not an expert but I would say that just because your blood work is negative doesn't mean that you don't have celiac.

As for the question of whether or not to go gluten-free now or wait...that's harder.

~Laura

I have asked my doctor to send me for a biopsy regardless of the blood results - I just want to put this all to rest. She agreed but there is no telling how long an appt. will take. There is somebody on this board in the same city in Canada as I am and even with a positive blood result it was 5 mos. before she was able to get in with a gastro. The likelihood is that somebody like me will be put at the bottom of the list for appts.

But my question is - if the range for the TTG is 0.0-20.0 and my reading was 2.8 - at which point do you question it's validity? I would say that is a fairly low reading. I do have symptoms and always have (since 3 yrs. old) but have always been told it's IBS. And it could be - that would be better than celiac of course - except for wanting to know WHY I feel like I do.

BUT, I feel very unwell all the time. Having D or C is not fun. But it's the headaches and body aches and fatigue that are getting to me now.

I'd love to go gluten-free but until I know when this biopsy might occur I'm reluctant to do that. I figure if I have to wait many months, than I'll try gluten free for a few months and see how I feel - then still have time to go back on gluten before the biopsy.

I guess I'd like to know if my range is so low that I needn't even entertain the idea of celiac. I was thinking that if it was something like 18 or 19 than I'd be more inclined to believe I MIGHT have celiac.

What do you think?

TracyB

TracyB Apprentice
Hi Tracy,

Regarding the chances of having celiac with your results, I can only offer my experience. I found out that I had celiac from a biopsy first, with the blood test - which was negative - done afterward. So you can definitely have celiac but have nothing zip nada show up in your blood work. There are others here with similar results. My doctor said that since I didn't have much damage, the level wasn't high enough to show in the blood work. I "only" had Marsh Level 1 damage, and did not have "blunted" villi. I've heard, anecdotally, that there are some here that had totally flat villi and still didn't test positive on blood work.

My opinion is that the blood tests are not very sensitive. If the blood work is positive, there are few false negatives. The reverse is not true.

Of course, I'm not a doctor and not an expert but I would say that just because your blood work is negative doesn't mean that you don't have celiac.

As for the question of whether or not to go gluten-free now or wait...that's harder.

~Laura

Hi Laura - thanks for the reply. Can I ask - do you know what the blood results were - I think the TTG is the one that's 0.0-20.0 scale and is generally considered a sensitive test. What prompted a biopsy in your case, instead of the usual blood test first? And I wondered how long you may have had signs of celiac before the biopsy?

I saw your signature on your son and his growth patterns. I wonder why they wouldn't do a biopsy on him when you have celiac?? That's not sensible. Has he gained weight/height since being gluten free?

It was my son and his problems that prompted me to finally see about myself. I have had so many people tell me to get checked for celiac including my neighbour who has it after misdiagnosis for years of IBS. I don't know - my symptoms are something that has been troublesome since I was only 3 yrs. old. I have had worse pain in past years than lately but now my symptoms are effecting my daily life more - the headaches, fatigue are horrendous at times. It's hard to get through the day and my energy is so bad. It's exhausting...so I thought that if I truly had celiac all these years that my bloods would reflect that.

At any rate getting my son checked at the same time was worthwhile. His immune system is very low (immunoglobulins G and M) and his iron and iron stores are also low as well as something else but can't remember. So need to get him to the doctor asap to go over these results. My son has ADD Inattentive Type and has what seems like the brain fog that I experience - except I don't have any signs of ADD and never have. I found a few mentions about learning and celiac and that celiac or undiagnosed celiac really, can cause learning problems due to the way it can effect the brain - foggy, unfocused, etc. Anyway, thanks for the info.! (BTW my son is 17).

TracyB

cyberprof Enthusiast

Hi Tracy,

I had celiac symptoms beginning from about age 17 (I'm 48 now) but no doctor ever worried. I had bloating, D, gas, all daily. I also had mouth ulcers at least monthly, joint pain, and developed anxiety and low-level depression. About 3 years before diagnosis, I started feeling worse and told the docs about the bloating, so they checked me for ovarian cancer but when that was negative they just ignored it and told me to lose weight. (I'm about 30 pounds overweight, 20 of which were gained in the year before diagnosis.). What finally happened was that I got terrible stomach pains, vomiting for no reason and heartburn and I went to the doc and she thought I had an ulcer, so they scheduled the 'scope, where they took samples and found no ulcer but celiac instead. Totally unexpected to me but there is a family history of Type I diabetes, stomach cancer and digestive troubles on both my parents sides, plus my sister has Graves Disease.

My son's bloodwork was also negative. He was deficient in several vitamins and iron and has a "bone age" of 12.5 and he looks like he's 12. They offered to do an endoscopy on him but my hubby is a medical-phobe and is terrified of the risks, given that they give kids general anesthesia. Yes, the risk is really low but hubby says any risk is too high (and he's the son of a neurosurgeon and a nurse...go figure). Hubby wanted son to go gluten-free without tests and son refused without some evidence. We compromised by doing Enterolab. He's dairy free too. Finally in August he started growing and maturing - hooray! He is still underweight but is eating well and taking lots of vitamins and minerals. The causal factor, in my opinion, was that his body was so malnorished and not absorbing vitamins that he didn't grow and now that he is absorbing more, he'll catch up.

When my son is an adult, if he wants then he can do a gluten challenge and a 'scope. We'll see what happens.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



TracyB Apprentice
Hi Tracy,

I had celiac symptoms beginning from about age 17 (I'm 48 now) but no doctor ever worried. I had bloating, D, gas, all daily. I also had mouth ulcers at least monthly, joint pain, and developed anxiety and low-level depression. About 3 years before diagnosis, I started feeling worse and told the docs about the bloating, so they checked me for ovarian cancer but when that was negative they just ignored it and told me to lose weight. (I'm about 30 pounds overweight, 20 of which were gained in the year before diagnosis.). What finally happened was that I got terrible stomach pains, vomiting for no reason and heartburn and I went to the doc and she thought I had an ulcer, so they scheduled the 'scope, where they took samples and found no ulcer but celiac instead. Totally unexpected to me but there is a family history of Type I diabetes, stomach cancer and digestive troubles on both my parents sides, plus my sister has Graves Disease.

My son's bloodwork was also negative. He was deficient in several vitamins and iron and has a "bone age" of 12.5 and he looks like he's 12. They offered to do an endoscopy on him but my hubby is a medical-phobe and is terrified of the risks, given that they give kids general anesthesia. Yes, the risk is really low but hubby says any risk is too high (and he's the son of a neurosurgeon and a nurse...go figure). Hubby wanted son to go gluten-free without tests and son refused without some evidence. We compromised by doing Enterolab. He's dairy free too. Finally in August he started growing and maturing - hooray! He is still underweight but is eating well and taking lots of vitamins and minerals. The causal factor, in my opinion, was that his body was so malnorished and not absorbing vitamins that he didn't grow and now that he is absorbing more, he'll catch up.

When my son is an adult, if he wants then he can do a gluten challenge and a 'scope. We'll see what happens.

Hi again - well, your story sounds much like mine. I'm 46 and was diagnosed with IBS after 1 week in hospital and pains in my gut that dropped me to the ground. My Dr. says today that would never have been the diagnosis - and they would look further today.

It really could just be IBS though of course. But I'd like to know for sure.

So happy to hear your son is doing better! My son had some unexpectedly poor blood results, don't know what it all means yet. So I know what it is to worry. Poor kid has always been the one with problems - from 3 months old. No growth issues though - he's 6'3" and about 163 - so very tall and very thin!

Do you remember what your lab results were? How old were you when you were diagnosed finally (sorry if you've already said or it shows in your sig.!).

Thanks again - maybe one day I'll find out why I feel like this - a really bad week - I'm so exhausted....

TracyB (editing this to say I see you were diagnosed nearly 2 years ago - wow, what a long time - 30 years not knowing!)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - AlwaysLearning replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Gluten related ??

    2. - Colleen H replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Gluten related ??

    3. - Jmartes71 replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    4. - AlwaysLearning replied to Jmartes71's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      4

      My only proof

    5. - AlwaysLearning replied to Colleen H's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      3

      Gluten related ??


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,084
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    bigwave
    Newest Member
    bigwave
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • AlwaysLearning
      Get tested for vitamin deficiencies.  Though neuropathy can be a symptom of celiac, it can also be caused by deficiencies due to poor digestion caused by celiac and could be easier to treat.
    • Colleen H
      Thank you so much for your response  Yes it seems as though things get very painful as time goes on.  I'm not eating gluten as far as I know.  However, I'm not sure of cross contamination.  My system seems to weaken to hidden spices and other possibilities. ???  if cross contamination is possible...I am in a super sensitive mode of celiac disease.. Neuropathy from head to toes
    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.