Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Negative Endoscopy - Fooling Self?

skinnyasparagus

Recommended Posts

skinnyasparagus Apprentice
skinnyasparagus
Posted

I had an endoscopy a few weeks ago and an additional blood test. I received my results today and everything is negative. The doctor wishes to proceed with a colonoscopy but I don't know.

If everything is negative, does that mean I don't have celiac's disease or the sprue? I've been living gluten free for 9 months now and I just feel as if everything's a joke. Everything was better from what it has been. I have more energy, I feel more active, but..are my reactions mental? I still get stomach pains, I still feel snaps in my stomach that I know aren't mental, I break out in minor hives every once in a while, I get D and C, heartburn, and I'm unable to maintain my weight.

I'm lactose free so I know its not dairy.

If its not celiac's disease, what is it? What will a colonoscopy prove? Should I proceed with it or just let it go and stick to what I know I feel is right? I just don't know if so many negatives mean that I can still have celiac's disease, even if the doctor can't find anything.

I've done all levels of blood testing and an endoscopy with biopsies of the stomach and small. No bacteria was found either.

I guess..I just need help and advice. Am I crazy? Am I mental? What should I do now?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


psawyer Proficient
psawyer
Posted

Your sig says you have been gluten-free for more than nine months. At this point, even if you do have celiac, the tests would likely be negative. It doesn't mean you don't have celiac, what it does mean is that you are successfully following the diet.

The colonoscopy can reveal other conditions which may be causing symptoms, but will not tell anything about celiac disease.

Lisa Mentor
Lisa
Posted
I had an endoscopy a few weeks ago and an additional blood test. I received my results today and everything is negative. The doctor wishes to proceed with a colonoscopy but I don't know.

If everything is negative, does that mean I don't have celiac's disease or the sprue? I've been living gluten free for 9 months now and I just feel as if everything's a joke. Everything was better from what it has been. I have more energy, I feel more active, but..are my reactions mental? I still get stomach pains, I still feel snaps in my stomach that I know aren't mental, I break out in minor hives every once in a while, I get D and C, heartburn, and I'm unable to maintain my weight.

I'm lactose free so I know its not dairy.

If its not celiac's disease, what is it? What will a colonoscopy prove? Should I proceed with it or just let it go and stick to what I know I feel is right? I just don't know if so many negatives mean that I can still have celiac's disease, even if the doctor can't find anything.

I've done all levels of blood testing and an endoscopy with biopsies of the stomach and small. No bacteria was found either.

I guess..I just need help and advice. Am I crazy? Am I mental? What should I do now?

After nine months gluten free, it's not unusual for negative testing. You may not be able to get a diagnoses due to the fact that you are off gluten, but it might be fair to say that you have at the least a gluten intolerance and/or gluten allergy, as indicated by your occasional symptoms. Be careful about your diet and make sure no gluten is surprizing.

Anytime your have digestive issues, it's a good rule to have both an endoscopy and colonoscopy to rule out more serious issues.

sbj Rookie
sbj
Posted
Am I crazy? Am I mental? What should I do now?

You are not crazy and you are not mental! If you had positive bloodwork and positive biopsy nine months ago, and now they are normal, then these problems are not due to celiac. If you did not have positive bloodwork or biopsy nine months ago then it is possible that you never had celiac to begin with. (That's why it's a good idea to get a biopsy before going gluten-free - you won't ever wonder whether you really have it if problems arise later.)

Either way, since your biopsy looks okay it is likely that these symptoms are not due to celiac but are due to something else. Other than celiac, your abdominal pain might be due to any of the following:

  • appendicitis
  • blockage of a bile duct by gallstones
  • swelling of the liver with hepatitis
  • diverticulitis
  • colitis
  • obstruction of the intestine
  • ischemic colitis
  • irritable bowel syndrome

What matters now is getting you well. Don't stick with what you 'know is right' if you are still suffering - you don't have to suffer. Your doctor believes you are in distress and that's why s/he is recommending a colonoscopy; a colonoscopy is warranted when someone is sufering from abdominal pain like you are. I suggest you get the colonoscopy - better safe than sorry!

happygirl Collaborator
happygirl
Posted

In the latest issue of the magazine, Living Without, there is an interview with Dr. Peter Green of Columbia.

He states,

".....Some people may feel better on a gluten free diet. If they dont' test positive for celiac disease, they may still be gluten sensitive. They may feel better by avoiding gluten, or just wheat....."

Q: Is the line between Celiac Disease and gluten sensitivity kind of fuzzy?

"In a way. Celiac Disease and gluten sensitivity are distinct conditions. But we don't yet have a mechanism to explain gluten sensitivity. We can't define it."

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular
Fiddle-Faddle
Posted

You say you know your problems are not dairy because you are lactose-free?

I'm sorry, but many people with dairy problems react to the CASEIN, not the lactose. You need to be dairy-free, not lactose-free to be sure that your problems are not dairy. And if you had villi damaged from celiac/gluten intolerance, the villi might not heal completely if you are sensitive to casein and are still consuming dairy.

sbj, I believe you are incorrect--if she had positive bloodwork and biopsy 9 months ago, and now the tests are negative, her problems COULD still be from celiac. Depending on the amount of damage, and depending on other food intolerances (like dairy) might still be going on, she might not have completely healed--and if the doctor didn't HAPPEN to test damaged patches, he might have missed them, as they are not always easily visible.

Sometimes damage from gluten doesn't heal until OTHER foods (either those to which the patient is sensitive, or eating too many gluten-free bread substitutes, which are difficult to digest) are removed from the diet.

As far as saying that she may never had celiac--I suppose that could be true, but YOU don't know. Nobody knows. There are false negatives, but false positives are practically unheard of. It is more likely that she does have either celiac, or gluten intolerance (perhaps early stage celiac), especially as her symptoms mostly improved on the gluten-free diet.

However, your list of other conditions are well worth looking into.

Lisa Mentor
Lisa
Posted
if she had positive bloodwork and biopsy 9 months ago,

sorry, never mind. .... I was just going to say, that skinnyasparagus did not mention what specific testing she had which prompted her to go gluten free nine months ago.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


skinnyasparagus Apprentice
skinnyasparagus
Posted
  • Author

sbj - I am deciding to go through with the colonoscopy since I came this far and might as well go the remainder of the way, even if it isn't related to diagnosing celiac's disease. If it isn't celiac's, maybe something else can be found.

Fiddle-Faddle - I do also look out for the casein, not just lactose. In my mental thinking of lactose I automatically sync it with casein. I know its incorrect but that's how I connect it when I explain it to other people.

Momma Goose - I know way back when I first started testing, my bloodwork came back with really elevated IgAs. This time, everything was really low. They only gave me an ultrasound at the time, which didn't show anything..because they normally are quite inaccurate. I didn't have any major testing done because at the time I had a very poor skilled doctor who thought I was a lunatic, which explains my paranoia about thinking I'm crazy..which I know for a fact pain is real.

I'm going to go a test when I have time this weekend to eat a half of a slice of bread to see my reaction. If I feel immediate pain like I did the first time when I went gluten free (I made a sandwich for my grandmother, didn't wash my hands, and ate my own which was gluten-free - seconds later I was wraithing in pain on the floor) then I know for fact that I have at least a gluten intolerance. It's not that I WANT celiac's disease, I just want to know what's wrong with me.

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular
Fiddle-Faddle
Posted

Hi, Skinnyasparagus,

Elevated gluten-specific IgA is considered a positive diagnosis for celiac--you are not a lunatic!!!!!

And, as explained above, the reason all your recent tests were negative is that they were testing (again) for antibodies to gluten. If you have been gluten-free since January, you absolutely should not be making antibodies for gluten. SO these test results do not mean that you don't have celiac. They mean that you have been really good about the gluten-free diet!

(They also mean that your doctor is an idiot, if he thinks it means that you don't have celiac--NOBODY, celiac or non-celiac, produces antibodies to a substance they are not exposed to!)

A friend of mine thought that she was eating dairy-free because she was very careful to buy rice cheese and soy cheese substitutes--they tasted terrible and they all said, "lactose-free!" in big, proud letters.

What she didn't realize (for several months!) was that those substitutes contained casein. Not all of the ones available contain casein, but every single one at the health food section of our grocery store (Giant Eagle) contained casein (which she figured out when she got a magnifying glass and looked at the ingredients and saw "casein.")

YOU ARE NOT CRAZY> YOU ARE NOT PARANOID> YOU ARE NOT A LUNATIC.

Welcome aboard!

Needless to say, she was really annoyed!

skinnyasparagus Apprentice
skinnyasparagus
Posted
  • Author
Hi, Skinnyasparagus,

Elevated gluten-specific IgA is considered a positive diagnosis for celiac--you are not a lunatic!!!!!

And, as explained above, the reason all your recent tests were negative is that they were testing (again) for antibodies to gluten. If you have been gluten-free since January, you absolutely should not be making antibodies for gluten. SO these test results do not mean that you don't have celiac. They mean that you have been really good about the gluten-free diet!

(They also mean that your doctor is an idiot, if he thinks it means that you don't have celiac--NOBODY, celiac or non-celiac, produces antibodies to a substance they are not exposed to!)

A friend of mine thought that she was eating dairy-free because she was very careful to buy rice cheese and soy cheese substitutes--they tasted terrible and they all said, "lactose-free!" in big, proud letters.

What she didn't realize (for several months!) was that those substitutes contained casein. Not all of the ones available contain casein, but every single one at the health food section of our grocery store (Giant Eagle) contained casein (which she figured out when she got a magnifying glass and looked at the ingredients and saw "casein.")

YOU ARE NOT CRAZY> YOU ARE NOT PARANOID> YOU ARE NOT A LUNATIC.

Welcome aboard!

Needless to say, she was really annoyed!

Ah! I know! I hate that rice cheese. I can't have soy either in large dosages so the soy cheese, on a standard, isn't good. Then I noticed the "dairy free" rice cheeses that melt like rubber still have trace lactose and milk enzymes. What the heck, you know? But the one issue I have is just that I know I saw high IgAs but I can't get a hold of my primary bloodtest since my first physician office was in Philadelphia, PA and I'm now in Concord, VA.

But at least I have some consolodation, thanks everyone. I know it was obvious but sometimes you get frustrated when you become the guinea pig.

sbj Rookie
sbj
Posted

Glad to hear you are going ahead with the colonoscopy. I think it will help bring you peace of mind. I hope everything comes out swell and you get some answers. Please write again to tell us how things go. BTW: If you have any questions about colonoscopies just ask away. I get one every year. They're not fun but they could save your life. They found some polyps during my last and that's actually a good thing. If they find them early they can be removed and they won't progress to cancer.

Regarding your bloodwork and celiac disease. If you tested elevated before and now you are low it means that you are doing a good job following the diet. It also could mean that your continuing symptoms are due to something other than celiac disease. You might have colitis or some kind of bacterial overgrowth.

I don't think you need to do a gluten chalenge to confirm you have celiac. If you tested positive before then you have it. Best to ask for your previous records and post here. Please don't put yourself through unnecessary pain.

And keep after your doctors. I always bring a piece of paper with notes on it to go over with my doctors. I don't let them out of the exam room until I've gotten answers to all of my questions. It's surprising how many doctors need to be educated. I've taught mine about Muir Torre syndrome, HNPCC, and Celiac disease. They are open to reading articles and have even looked up websites I recommended while I've been in the room with them. Bring books, websites, articles with you and put them in their face. They won't call you crazy if you can quote Dr Green for support.

Thanks for sharing.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,688
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    sandyebel
    Newest Member
    sandyebel
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Rejoicephd · Posted

      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Inkie · Posted

      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      Inconclusive results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.