Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Inaccurate Food Labeling


frec

Recommended Posts

frec Contributor

Open Original Shared Link

I am sure this isn't a surprise to anyone.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



darlindeb25 Collaborator

Thank you for posting it under it's own title. I was thinking about doing it myself. I have no interest in Willshire Farm products, so I had not read that thread, simply because it does not pretain to me in anyway.

Nope, it's no surprise. I have been saying, since the law came out about allergen labeling, that unless the FDA polices these companies, then the labeling is worthless. I knew all along that we should not trust these companies or the FDA. Why should the FDA be any different from any other govt agency?

When the whole problem surfaced about melamine in foods from China, our govt sent FDA agents to checkout compaines in China, 12 agents. Now how much can 12 agents do in all of China?

It's up to us to figure out what we can and can't eat. I eat almost no processed foods. Anything I do buy, has a minimun amount of ingredients. I find this article very scary.

lizard00 Enthusiast

That is so scary! Couldn't that family sure for false advertising or something. There needs to be repercussions for these companies who don't care.

spunky Contributor

This is very bad.

I hope the new administration straightens out our FDA so that people can KNOW what they are buying/eating/ingesting.

I heard a doctor somehwere, on some interview, talking about celiac... someone asked if it was okay to eat something gluten free that was made in a facility that processes wheat products, or on machinery that does... she said she had to advise against doing so, because her celiac patients who had taken trips to certain Asian countries (esp. the areas that are not on the wheat wagon) said they felt better while vacationing there than they ever did in their lives... she was thinking it was because for the first time ever they were eating foods that were not in the vicinity of airborne flour, etc.

Besides no labeling standards to go by, and nobody to answer to as far as truthfulness on their labels... something's just gotta change in this country.

I feel especially bad for children with severe, immediate allergic reactions... who can their parents trust?

Not to mention trying to avoid gluten... I mean, I just wonder how many of the bumps in the rocky road of my own recovery have actually been caused by dishonest or sloppy labeling?????

Not good... things need to change!!!!!

rinne Apprentice

Thank you for posting the article, unfortunately, it doesn't surprise me at all.

I wish there was a home test for gluten! I would like to see Celiac Associations look at a class action suit against these companies for false advertising, one really big case with a huge settlement might make them pay attention.

But I don't know, I will never forget reading the article about dangerous cars not being recalled because the money men understood that it was cheaper to pay off those who found a way to sue than recall the cars. People died, they knew this would happen. This is the same kind of thinking.

Personally, if I let it, it fills me with rage and sickness that those who profit from us care so little but I am not going to let them get me that way either. :ph34r::lol:

I envision a new economy based on relationship, I think these are the lessons we are learning on our way there. The most important being that we are responsible for our health and that those who profit from our illness are most motivated to keep us so.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,596
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Vicki teach
    Newest Member
    Vicki teach
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.2k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Alibu
      I was tested back in 2017 and my TTG-IGA was mildly elevated (an 11 with reference range <4) but my EMA was negative and biopsy was negative. Fast forward to 2 weeks ago where I was like y'know what, I still have so many symptoms and I'm always so sick, I should repeat this, thinking it was not going to be positive.  I also found out through 23 and me that I do have the HLA-DQ2.5 gene so I thought it would be good to repeat given my ongoing symptoms. Well my blood work came back with a ttg-iga level of 152.6 with a reference range of <15 and my EMA was positive and EMA titer was 1:10 with reference range of <1:5. I guess I'm nervous that I'm going to do the biopsy and it's going to be negative again, especially since I also had an endoscopy in 2020, not to look for celiac but just as a regular 5 year thing I do because of all my GI issues, and they didn't see anything then either. I have no idea how long the EMA has been positive but I'm wondering if it's very recent, if the biopsy will show damage and if so, if they'll say well the biopsy is the gold standard so it's not celiac? I of course am doing all the things to convince myself that it isn't real. Do a lot of people go through this? I think because back in 2017 my ttg-iga was elevated but not a huge amount and my EMA was negative and my biopsy was negative, I keep thinking this time it's going to be different. But this time my ttg-iga is 152.6 with reference range <15, and my EMA was positive. BUT, my titer is only 1:10 and I keep reading how most people here had a ttg-iga in the hundreds or thousands, and the EMA titer was much higher. So now I am convinced that it was a false positive and when they do the biopsy it'll be negative.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @linnylou73! Are you claiming this based on a reaction or based upon actual testing?
    • linnylou73
      Sams club membermark columbian coffee is either cross contaminated or the pods contain gluten
    • KimMS
    • Scott Adams
      This varies a lot from person to person. I include foods that are not certified gluten-free but are labelled "gluten-free", while super sensitive people only use certified gluten-free. Both types of products have been found to contain gluten, so there are no guarantees either way: It you are in the super sensitive group, eating a whole foods based diet where you prepare everything is the safest bet, but it's also difficult. Eating out is the the most risky, even if a restaurant has a gluten-free menu. I also include items that are naturally gluten-free, for example refried beans, tuna, pasta sauces, salsas, etc., which have a low overall risk of contamination.
×
×
  • Create New...