Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Sigh


Billygean

Recommended Posts

Billygean Apprentice

Well you can probably see from my other posts that I had mono followed by chronic fatigue and a lot of digestive issues. My coeliac test was negative but I went gluten free on the advice of a coeliac relative and got almost better. Since I still had a while before returning to college I decided to try a gluten challenge. I had four slices of bread in four days and was in bed for the best part of a month. I'm still pretty confused because I also had a cold at the time which can cause issues for people with chronic fatigue. I went off the gluten though and I am no longer ravenous and light headed, and the chronic fatigue's almost gone again.

Saw a doctor and my relative with coeliacs said he might diagnose me on dietary evidence. He's sent me for a blood test and says it'll be positive if I have it. I know this is rubbish so I saw another dr. He was great and said to keep an open mind and do the blood test as if it's positive he can diagnose me but I've been glutenf ree for another 6 weeks now (6 months before the gluten challenge) so we think it won't be. He's referred me - but I'm not going to eat wheat - so I don't really know what to do next?!?

BG


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



nikki-uk Enthusiast
Saw a doctor and my relative with coeliacs said he might diagnose me on dietary evidence. He's sent me for a blood test and says it'll be positive if I have it. I know this is rubbish so I saw another dr. He was great and said to keep an open mind and do the blood test as if it's positive he can diagnose me but I've been glutenf ree for another 6 weeks now (6 months before the gluten challenge) so we think it won't be. He's referred me - but I'm not going to eat wheat - so I don't really know what to do next?!?

You are right in thinking your blood test will more than likely come back neg after 6 weeks gluten-free - a small bowel biopsy would also most likely be negative as well I'm afraid :(

So, see the doc anyway (possible diagnosis on dietary evidence?)

OR do the gluten challenge (at least 6 weeks ON gluten)....only you know if you are up to that

OR take a gene test (might give you a better idea if you KNOW you carry the 'known' genes for celiac disease)

OR you could just carry on as you are :)

There are many people on this site without a 'formal' diagnosis, but KNOW gluten is no good for them.

Good Luck :)

ang1e0251 Contributor

I'm one of those with no official dx. I don't feel the need and will not go back on Gluten , uh-uh. My children are grown and don't need my test results if they choose to be tested. Also I'm a little concerned how my insurance carriers will treat me with a dx. I've heard rumores. You know how you feel gluten-free, if you choose not to do a challenge, it's a personal choice of your own.

zero Newbie

The gene test sounds like a good suggestion. Have you been tested for a wheat allergy (are there skin tests for that)? It is nice having a label of celiac to justify the dietary restriction but your reaction is so severe that you might just be going through a lot of pain, hassle and expense to finally be told to avoid gluten which you already know.

I'll also suggest that if your feeling adventurous (and because I am an engineer and think of such weird things), you could do another experiment. You have a reaction after eating bread but you introduce a bias because you know you are eating gluten. With the help of a conspirator, you could set up a series of meals which usually don't but occasionally do contain hidden gluten. Perhaps a little flour mixed into spaghetti sauce or something and record what your reactions are. At the end of the experiment you can compare how your reactions correlate to the gluten. I suggest this because one of the most satisfying experiences I had after diagnosis and being gluten free was having an unexpected reaction which I tracked down to some soy milk containing wheat. Even with the celiac diagnosis, it confirmed to me that gluten really was the problem which was not apparent prior to the diagnosis. Good luck.

rob

Amyleigh0007 Enthusiast

There is a skin test for wheat allergy. I had it done last summer. My allergist diagnosed me with gluten intolerance based on positive resposne to diet (among other factors) so maybe visiting an allergist would be helpful. She seemed to know much more about Celiac and gluten intolerance then my primary doctor.

buffettbride Enthusiast

My husband is one of those in the "no diagnosis" category as well. We discovered his gluten intolerance after our daughter was diagnosed with Celiac and we decided to keep our house gluten free. Suddenly his tummy "wrongness" went away and so did that peculiar rash on his fingers. ;) He decided that pursuing a diagnosis wasn't as important since he knew gluten (and sometimes dairy) made him feel awful, even when his blood screen came back negative.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,198
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Joanne01
    Newest Member
    Joanne01
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
    • trents
      @JettaGirl, "Coeliac" is the British spelling of "celiac". Same disease. 
    • JettaGirl
      This may sound ridiculous but is this supposed to say Celiacs? I looked up Coeliacs because you never know, there’s a lot of diseases related to a disease that they come up with similar names for. It’s probably meant to say Celiacs but I just wanted to confirm.
    • JoJo0611
      I was told it was to see how much damage has been caused. But just told CT with contrast not any other name for it. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.