Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Medication Costs Article - Amazing! Go To Costco!


leadmeastray88

Recommended Posts

leadmeastray88 Contributor

I got this in an email and was left speechless!

If you buy lots of meds and pay through the roof, you may want to read this!!

P.S. The lady who did this is a Budget Analyst, I did not do this

-----------

Did you ever wonder how much it costs a drug company for the active ingredient in prescription

medications? Some people think it must cost a lot, since many drugs

sell for more than $2.00 per tablet. We did a search of offshore

chemical synthesizers that supply the active ingredients found in

drugs approved by the FDA. As we have revealed in past issues of

Life Extension a significant percentage of drugs sold in the United

States contain active ingredients made in other countries. In our

independent investigation of how much profit drug companies really

make, we obtained the actual price of active ingredients used in

some of the most popular drugs sold in America

.

Celebrex:100 mg

Consumer price (100 tablets): $130.27

Cost of general active ingredients: $0.60

Percent markup: 21,712%

Claritin:10 mg

Consumer Price (100 tablets): $215.17

Cost of general active ingredients: $0.71

Percent markup: 30,306%

Keflex:250 mg

Consumer Price (100 tablets): $157.39

Cost of general active ingredients: $1.88

Percent markup: 8,372%

Lipitor:20 mg

Consumer Price (100 tablets): $272.37

Cost of general active ingredients: $5.80

Percent markup: 4,696%

Norvasc:10 mg

Consumer price (100 tablets): $188.29

Cost of general active ingredients: $0.14

Percent markup: 134,493%

Paxil:20 mg

Consumer price (100 tablets): $220.27

Cost of general active ingredients: $7.60

Percent markup: 2,898%

Prevacid:30 mg

Consumer price (100 tablets): $44.77

Cost of general active ingredients: $1.01

Percent markup: 34,136%

Prilosec: 20 mg

Consumer price (100 tablets): $360.97

Cost of general active ingredients $0.52

Percent markup: 69,417%

Prozac:20 mg

Consumer price (100 tablets) : $247.47

Cost of general active ingredients: $0.11

Percent markup: 224,973%

Tenormin:50 mg

Consumer price (100 tablets): $104.47

Cost of general active ingredients: $0.13

Percent markup: 80,362%

Vasotec:10 mg

Consumer price (100 tablets): $102.37

Cost of general active ingredients: $0.20

Percent markup: 51,185%

Xanax:1 mg

Consumer price (100 tablets) : $136.79

Cost of general active ingredients: $0.024

Percent markup: 569,958%

Zestril:20 mg

Consumer price (100 tablets):$89.89

Cost of general active ingredients $3.20

Percent markup: 2,809%

Zithromax:600 mg

Consumer price (100 tablets): $1,482.19

Cost of general active ingredients: $18.78

Percent markup: 7,892%

Zocor:40 mg

Consumer price (100 tablets): $350.27

Cost of general active ingredients: $8.63

Percent markup: 4,059%

Zoloft:50 mg

Consumer price: $206.87

Cost of general active ingredients: $1.75

Percent markup: 11,821%

Since the cost of prescription

drugs is so outrageous, I thought everyone should know about

this. It pays to shop around! This helps to solve the mystery as to why they

can afford to put a Walgreen's on every corner. On Monday night,

Steve Wilson, an investigative reporter for Channel 7 News in

Detroit , did a story on generic drug prices gouging by pharmacies.

He found in his investigation that some of these generic drugs were

marked up as much as 3,000% or more. So often we blame the drug

companies for the high cost of drugs, and usually rightfully so. But

in this case, the fault clearly lies with the pharmacies themselves.

For example if you had to buy a prescription drug, and bought the

name brand, you might pay $100 for 100 pills.

The pharmacist might tell you

that if you get the generic equivalent, they would only cost $80,

making you think you are saving $20. What the pharmacist is not

telling you is that those 100 generic pills may have only cost him

$10!

At

the end of the report, one of the anchors asked Mr. Wilson whether

or not there were any pharmacies that did not adhere to this

practice, and he said that Costco consistently charged little over

their cost for the generic drugs.

I went

to the Costco site, where you can look up any drug, and get its

online price. It says that the in-store prices are consistent with

the online prices. I was appalled. Just to give you one example from

my own experience I had to use the drug Compazine which helps

prevent nausea in chemo patients.

I used the

generic equivalent, which cost $54.99 for 60 pills at CVS. I checked

the price at Costco, and I could have bought 100 pills for $19.89.

For 145 of my pain pills, I paid $72.57. I could have got 150 at

Costco for $28.08.

I would like to mention, that

although Costco is a 'membership' type store, you do NOT have to be

a member to buy prescriptions there as it is a federally regulated

substance. You just tell them at the door that you wish to use the

pharmacy, and they will let you in.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



sbj Rookie

Costco also has great prices on vitamins.

I want to point out that the cost of name brand prescription drugs is not controlled by the cost of the ingredients themselves; the cost is controlled by the manufacturer's need to recoup their research and development expenses while showing a profit (which they owe to their shareholders). If the pharma companies could not recoup their R&D expenses then there would be no incentive for them to develop new drugs. (Not that I'm defending the pharma companies and some of their practices - don't get me wrong ... )

For instance, when they finally do come out with a drug that helps us to digest gluten safely, you can bet that it's gonna cost a heckuva lot more than just the expense of the ingredients themselves. They've been formulating and testing these drugs for years and that costs a pretty penny - they have the right to recoup those expenses and make a profit.

leadmeastray88 Contributor
Costco also has great prices on vitamins.

I want to point out that the cost of name brand prescription drugs is not controlled by the cost of the ingredients themselves; the cost is controlled by the manufacturer's need to recoup their research and development expenses while showing a profit (which they owe to their shareholders). If the pharma companies could not recoup their R&D expenses then there would be no incentive for them to develop new drugs. (Not that I'm defending the pharma companies and some of their practices - don't get me wrong ... )

For instance, when they finally do come out with a drug that helps us to digest gluten safely, you can bet that it's gonna cost a heckuva lot more than just the expense of the ingredients themselves. They've been formulating and testing these drugs for years and that costs a pretty penny - they have the right to recoup those expenses and make a profit.

Even though Costco can offer these low prices, there is obviously even still a percentage of that which is 'profit' for the companies. I just find that the present percentages of profits are astounding, and incredibly high. You can't deny that. That is simply robbing us blind.

Jestgar Rising Star
I want to point out that the cost of name brand prescription drugs is not controlled by the cost of the ingredients themselves; the cost is controlled by the manufacturer's need to recoup their research and development expenses while showing a profit (which they owe to their shareholders). If the pharma companies could not recoup their R&D expenses then there would be no incentive for them to develop new drugs. (Not that I'm defending the pharma companies and some of their practices - don't get me wrong ... )

For instance, when they finally do come out with a drug that helps us to digest gluten safely, you can bet that it's gonna cost a heckuva lot more than just the expense of the ingredients themselves. They've been formulating and testing these drugs for years and that costs a pretty penny - they have the right to recoup those expenses and make a profit.

I'd like to second this. Only 1 out of 100 drugs researched makes it to market. You are paying for all 100. If you have a way to make this better, I'm sure the drug companies would like to know.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - knitty kitty replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    2. - Jane02 replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    3. - knitty kitty replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

    4. 0

      Penobscot Bay, Maine: Nurturing Gluten-Free Wellness Retreat with expert celiac dietitian, Melinda Dennis

    5. - Scott Adams replied to Jane02's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      9

      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,332
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Nicolah
    Newest Member
    Nicolah
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      @Jane02, I hear you about the kale and collard greens.  I don't do dairy and must eat green leafies, too, to get sufficient calcium.  I must be very careful because some calcium supplements are made from ground up crustacean shells.  When I was deficient in Vitamin D, I took high doses of Vitamin D to correct the deficiency quickly.  This is safe and nontoxic.  Vitamin D level should be above 70 nmol/L.  Lifeguards and indigenous Pacific Islanders typically have levels between 80-100 nmol/L.   Levels lower than this are based on amount needed to prevent disease like rickets and osteomalacia. We need more thiamine when we're physically ill, emotionally and mentally stressed, and if we exercise like an athlete or laborer.  We need more thiamine if we eat a diet high in simple carbohydrates.  For every 500 kcal of carbohydrates, we need 500-1000 mg more of thiamine to process the carbs into energy.  If there's insufficient thiamine the carbs get stored as fat.  Again, recommended levels set for thiamine are based on minimum amounts needed to prevent disease.  This is often not adequate for optimum health, nor sufficient for people with absorption problems such as Celiac disease.  Gluten free processed foods are not enriched with vitamins like their gluten containing counterparts.  Adding a B Complex and additional thiamine improves health for Celiacs.  Thiamine is safe and nontoxic even in high doses.  Thiamine helps the mitochondria in cells to function.  Thiamine interacts with each of the other B vitamins.  They are all water soluble and easily excreted if not needed. Interesting Reading: Clinical trial: B vitamins improve health in patients with coeliac disease living on a gluten-free diet https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19154566/ Safety and effectiveness of vitamin D mega-dose: A systematic review https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34857184/ High dose dietary vitamin D allocates surplus calories to muscle and growth instead of fat via modulation of myostatin and leptin signaling https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38766160/ Safety of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31746327/ Vitamins and Celiac Disease: Beyond Vitamin D https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11857425/ Investigating the therapeutic potential of tryptophan and vitamin A in modulating immune responses in celiac disease: an experimental study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40178602/ Investigating the Impact of Vitamin A and Amino Acids on Immune Responses in Celiac Disease Patients https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10814138/
    • Jane02
      Thank you so much @knitty kitty for this insightful information! I would have never considered fractionated coconut oil to be a potential source of GI upset. I will consider all the info you shared. Very interesting about the Thiamine deficiency.  I've tracked daily averages of my intake in a nutrition software. The only nutrient I can't consistently meet from my diet is vitamin D. Calcium is a hit and miss as I rely on vegetables, dark leafy greens as a major source, for my calcium intake. I'm able to meet it when I either eat or juice a bundle of kale or collard greens daily haha. My thiamine intake is roughly 120% of my needs, although I do recognize that I may not be absorbing all of these nutrients consistently with intermittent unintentional exposures to gluten.  My vitamin A intake is roughly 900% (~6400 mcg/d) of my needs as I eat a lot of sweet potato, although since it's plant-derived vitamin A (beta-carotene) apparently it's not likely to cause toxicity.  Thanks again! 
    • knitty kitty
      Hello, @Jane02,  I take Naturewise D 3.  It contains olive oil.   Some Vitamin D supplements, like D Drops, are made with fractionated coconut oil which can cause digestive upsets.  Fractionated coconut oil is not the same as coconut oil used for cooking.  Fractionated coconut oil has been treated for longer shelf life, so it won't go bad in the jar, and thus may be irritating to the digestive system. I avoid supplements made with soy because many people with Celiac Disease also react to soy.  Mixed tocopherols, an ingredient in Thornes Vitamin D, may be sourced from soy oil.  Kirkland's has soy on its ingredient list. I avoid things that might contain or be exposed to crustaceans, like Metagenics says on its label.  I have a crustacean/shellfish/fish allergy.  I like Life Extension Bioactive Complete B Complex.  I take additional Thiamine B 1 in the form Benfotiamine which helps the intestines heal, Life Extension MegaBenfotiamine. Thiamine is needed to activate Vitamin D.   Low thiamine can make one feel like they are getting glutened after a meal containing lots of simple carbohydrates like white rice, or processed gluten free foods like cookies and pasta.   It's rare to have a single vitamin deficiency.  The water soluble B Complex vitamins should be supplemented together with additional Thiamine in the form Benfotiamine and Thiamine TTFD (tetrahydrofurfuryl disulfide) to correct subclinical deficiencies that don't show up on blood tests.  These are subclinical deficiencies within organs and tissues.  Blood is a transportation system.  The body will deplete tissues and organs in order to keep a supply of thiamine in the bloodstream going to the brain and heart.   If you're low in Vitamin D, you may well be low in other fat soluble vitamins like Vitamin A and Vitamin K. Have you seen a dietician?
    • Scott Adams
      I do not know this, but since they are labelled gluten-free, and are not really a product that could easily be contaminated when making them (there would be not flour in the air of such a facility, for example), I don't really see contamination as something to be concerned about for this type of product. 
    • trents
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.