Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Medication Costs Article - Amazing! Go To Costco!


leadmeastray88

Recommended Posts

leadmeastray88 Contributor

I got this in an email and was left speechless!

If you buy lots of meds and pay through the roof, you may want to read this!!

P.S. The lady who did this is a Budget Analyst, I did not do this

-----------

Did you ever wonder how much it costs a drug company for the active ingredient in prescription

medications? Some people think it must cost a lot, since many drugs

sell for more than $2.00 per tablet. We did a search of offshore

chemical synthesizers that supply the active ingredients found in

drugs approved by the FDA. As we have revealed in past issues of

Life Extension a significant percentage of drugs sold in the United

States contain active ingredients made in other countries. In our

independent investigation of how much profit drug companies really

make, we obtained the actual price of active ingredients used in

some of the most popular drugs sold in America

.

Celebrex:100 mg

Consumer price (100 tablets): $130.27

Cost of general active ingredients: $0.60

Percent markup: 21,712%

Claritin:10 mg

Consumer Price (100 tablets): $215.17

Cost of general active ingredients: $0.71

Percent markup: 30,306%

Keflex:250 mg

Consumer Price (100 tablets): $157.39

Cost of general active ingredients: $1.88

Percent markup: 8,372%

Lipitor:20 mg

Consumer Price (100 tablets): $272.37

Cost of general active ingredients: $5.80

Percent markup: 4,696%

Norvasc:10 mg

Consumer price (100 tablets): $188.29

Cost of general active ingredients: $0.14

Percent markup: 134,493%

Paxil:20 mg

Consumer price (100 tablets): $220.27

Cost of general active ingredients: $7.60

Percent markup: 2,898%

Prevacid:30 mg

Consumer price (100 tablets): $44.77

Cost of general active ingredients: $1.01

Percent markup: 34,136%

Prilosec: 20 mg

Consumer price (100 tablets): $360.97

Cost of general active ingredients $0.52

Percent markup: 69,417%

Prozac:20 mg

Consumer price (100 tablets) : $247.47

Cost of general active ingredients: $0.11

Percent markup: 224,973%

Tenormin:50 mg

Consumer price (100 tablets): $104.47

Cost of general active ingredients: $0.13

Percent markup: 80,362%

Vasotec:10 mg

Consumer price (100 tablets): $102.37

Cost of general active ingredients: $0.20

Percent markup: 51,185%

Xanax:1 mg

Consumer price (100 tablets) : $136.79

Cost of general active ingredients: $0.024

Percent markup: 569,958%

Zestril:20 mg

Consumer price (100 tablets):$89.89

Cost of general active ingredients $3.20

Percent markup: 2,809%

Zithromax:600 mg

Consumer price (100 tablets): $1,482.19

Cost of general active ingredients: $18.78

Percent markup: 7,892%

Zocor:40 mg

Consumer price (100 tablets): $350.27

Cost of general active ingredients: $8.63

Percent markup: 4,059%

Zoloft:50 mg

Consumer price: $206.87

Cost of general active ingredients: $1.75

Percent markup: 11,821%

Since the cost of prescription

drugs is so outrageous, I thought everyone should know about

this. It pays to shop around! This helps to solve the mystery as to why they

can afford to put a Walgreen's on every corner. On Monday night,

Steve Wilson, an investigative reporter for Channel 7 News in

Detroit , did a story on generic drug prices gouging by pharmacies.

He found in his investigation that some of these generic drugs were

marked up as much as 3,000% or more. So often we blame the drug

companies for the high cost of drugs, and usually rightfully so. But

in this case, the fault clearly lies with the pharmacies themselves.

For example if you had to buy a prescription drug, and bought the

name brand, you might pay $100 for 100 pills.

The pharmacist might tell you

that if you get the generic equivalent, they would only cost $80,

making you think you are saving $20. What the pharmacist is not

telling you is that those 100 generic pills may have only cost him

$10!

At

the end of the report, one of the anchors asked Mr. Wilson whether

or not there were any pharmacies that did not adhere to this

practice, and he said that Costco consistently charged little over

their cost for the generic drugs.

I went

to the Costco site, where you can look up any drug, and get its

online price. It says that the in-store prices are consistent with

the online prices. I was appalled. Just to give you one example from

my own experience I had to use the drug Compazine which helps

prevent nausea in chemo patients.

I used the

generic equivalent, which cost $54.99 for 60 pills at CVS. I checked

the price at Costco, and I could have bought 100 pills for $19.89.

For 145 of my pain pills, I paid $72.57. I could have got 150 at

Costco for $28.08.

I would like to mention, that

although Costco is a 'membership' type store, you do NOT have to be

a member to buy prescriptions there as it is a federally regulated

substance. You just tell them at the door that you wish to use the

pharmacy, and they will let you in.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



sbj Rookie

Costco also has great prices on vitamins.

I want to point out that the cost of name brand prescription drugs is not controlled by the cost of the ingredients themselves; the cost is controlled by the manufacturer's need to recoup their research and development expenses while showing a profit (which they owe to their shareholders). If the pharma companies could not recoup their R&D expenses then there would be no incentive for them to develop new drugs. (Not that I'm defending the pharma companies and some of their practices - don't get me wrong ... )

For instance, when they finally do come out with a drug that helps us to digest gluten safely, you can bet that it's gonna cost a heckuva lot more than just the expense of the ingredients themselves. They've been formulating and testing these drugs for years and that costs a pretty penny - they have the right to recoup those expenses and make a profit.

leadmeastray88 Contributor
Costco also has great prices on vitamins.

I want to point out that the cost of name brand prescription drugs is not controlled by the cost of the ingredients themselves; the cost is controlled by the manufacturer's need to recoup their research and development expenses while showing a profit (which they owe to their shareholders). If the pharma companies could not recoup their R&D expenses then there would be no incentive for them to develop new drugs. (Not that I'm defending the pharma companies and some of their practices - don't get me wrong ... )

For instance, when they finally do come out with a drug that helps us to digest gluten safely, you can bet that it's gonna cost a heckuva lot more than just the expense of the ingredients themselves. They've been formulating and testing these drugs for years and that costs a pretty penny - they have the right to recoup those expenses and make a profit.

Even though Costco can offer these low prices, there is obviously even still a percentage of that which is 'profit' for the companies. I just find that the present percentages of profits are astounding, and incredibly high. You can't deny that. That is simply robbing us blind.

Jestgar Rising Star
I want to point out that the cost of name brand prescription drugs is not controlled by the cost of the ingredients themselves; the cost is controlled by the manufacturer's need to recoup their research and development expenses while showing a profit (which they owe to their shareholders). If the pharma companies could not recoup their R&D expenses then there would be no incentive for them to develop new drugs. (Not that I'm defending the pharma companies and some of their practices - don't get me wrong ... )

For instance, when they finally do come out with a drug that helps us to digest gluten safely, you can bet that it's gonna cost a heckuva lot more than just the expense of the ingredients themselves. They've been formulating and testing these drugs for years and that costs a pretty penny - they have the right to recoup those expenses and make a profit.

I'd like to second this. Only 1 out of 100 drugs researched makes it to market. You are paying for all 100. If you have a way to make this better, I'm sure the drug companies would like to know.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to Butch68's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Guinness, can you drink it?

    2. - MogwaiStripe replied to Midwestern's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      15

      Gluten Issues and Vitamin D

    3. - Butch68 posted a topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      1

      Guinness, can you drink it?

    4. - trents replied to Xravith's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      17

      Taking Probiotics but Still Getting Sick After Gluten – Advice?


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,216
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Athenablue
    Newest Member
    Athenablue
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      This is a very common question, and the most important thing to know is that no, Guinness is not considered safe for individuals with coeliac disease. While it's fascinating to hear anecdotes from other coeliacs who can drink it without immediate issues, this is a risky exception rather than the rule. The core issue is that Guinness is brewed from barley, which contains gluten, and the standard brewing process does not remove the gluten protein to a level safe for coeliacs (below 20ppm). For someone like you who experiences dermatitis herpetiformis, the reaction is particularly significant. DH is triggered by gluten ingestion, even without immediate gastrointestinal symptoms. So, while you may not feel an instant stomach upset, drinking a gluten-containing beer like Guinness could very well provoke a flare-up of your skin condition days later. It would be a gamble with a potentially uncomfortable and long-lasting consequence. Fortunately, there are excellent, certified gluten-free stouts available now that can provide a safe and satisfying alternative without the risk.
    • MogwaiStripe
      Interestingly, this thought occurred to me last night. I did find that there are studies investigating whether vitamin D deficiency can actually trigger celiac disease.  Source: National Institutes of Health https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7231074/ 
    • Butch68
      Before being diagnosed coeliac I used to love Guinness. Being made from barley it should be something a coeliac shouldn’t drink. But taking to another coeliac and they can drink it with no ill effects and have heard of others who can drink it too.  is this everyone’s experience?  Can I drink it?  I get dermatitis herpetiformis and don’t get instant reactions to gluten so can’t try it to see for myself. 
    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.