Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

I Am Confused And Looking For Opinions


jstopka

Recommended Posts

jstopka Newbie

Hi...

I had posted on here about three weeks ago about having a blood test that showed certain levels, along with a low vitamin D level, requesting that I get a biopsy to confirm if I have celiac.

Well, I got the biopsy and the results were negative, along with no anti-flamatory symptoms that come with celiac.

I spoke with my primary care physcian and he said that I should assume I have celiac due to the blood test and that the biopsy only takes a part of my intestine so he may have missed it.

So then I called the doc who did the biopsy and he said he believes I really don't have it....

so my wife and I are very confused....we have gone about for the past two weeks changing my diet and such, and don't know what to believe anymore.

Is the blood test more accurate than the biopsy, cuz everyone that I have spoken with said the biopsy is the best way to test for celiac.......is there any other explanations out there....I just don't know who to believe....

I want to do one more blood test which would mean going off the diet and hammering th wheat again to get a decent blood test, or should I just assume I have it.....

My wife and I have two contradicting reports and don't know what to think.......

If anyone has heard of a similar experience, or has any opinion that would be awesome!!!!!

thanks for your time

jeremy


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa Mentor

Hi Jeremy,

I certainly understand your confusion. Consistency is new to the medical world regarding Celiac and it's associations.

I don't recall your blood work results, but if you doctor considered it positive, that in itself is a diagnoses. A biopsy can confirm that diagnoses or establish a diagnosis. Neither are as accurate as we would like at this time.

If your blood work was positive and you have a positive dietary result, I would remain on the diet and consider yourself to have a diagnoses of Celiac Disease. As your doctor mentioned, biopsies can be hit or miss.

Hope this was helpful.

jstopka Newbie
Hi Jeremy,

I certainly understand your confusion. Consistency is new to the medical world regarding Celiac and it's associations.

I don't recall your blood work results, but if you doctor considered it positive, that in itself is a diagnoses. A biopsy can confirm that diagnoses or establish a diagnosis. Neither are as accurate as we would like at this time.

If your blood work was positive and you have a positive dietary result, I would remain on the diet and consider yourself to have a diagnoses of Celiac Disease. As your doctor mentioned, biopsies can be hit or miss.

Hope this was helpful.

Yeah, either way I am prepared to deal with a new diet and all...here were my blood test results....

IGA, Serum 669H

Gladin Antibody IGA 38 H

Vitamin D 17L

where as my TTG Antibody, IGA was <3 which put me on the negative range for that part of the test

My doctor who saw the test said the low vitamin D was another indicator...so I am just wondering where to go from here......am I in the early stages so I should act accordingly, or should I just go back to the way I was and see what happens? I am just confused.......I hope those numbers made sense

thanks again to anyone who has an opinion on this

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,075
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Amy1620
    Newest Member
    Amy1620
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Jmartes71
      EXACTLY! I was asked yesterday on my LAST video call with Standford and I stated exactly yes absolutely this is why I need the name! One, get proper care, two, not get worse.Im falling apart, stressed out, in pain and just opened email from Stanford stating I was rude ect.I want that video reviewed by higher ups and see if that women still has a job or not.Im saying this because I've been medically screwed and asking for help because bills don't pay itself. This could be malpratice siit but im not good at finding lawyers
    • AlwaysLearning
      We feel your pain. It took me 20+ years of regularly going to doctors desperate for answers only to be told there was nothing wrong with me … when I was 20 pounds underweight, suffering from severe nutritional deficiencies, and in a great deal of pain. I had to figure it out for myself. If you're in the U.S., not having an official diagnosis does mean you can't claim a tax deduction for the extra expense of gluten-free foods. But it can also be a good thing. Pre-existing conditions might be a reason why a health insurance company might reject your application or charge you more money. No official diagnosis means you don't have a pre-existing condition. I really hope you don't live in the U.S. and don't have these challenges. Do you need an official diagnosis for a specific reason? Else, I wouldn't worry about it. As long as you're diligent in remaining gluten free, your body should be healing as much as possible so there isn't much else you could do anyway. And there are plenty of us out here who never got that official diagnosis because we couldn't eat enough gluten to get tested. Now that the IL-2 test is available, I suppose I could take it, but I don't feel the need. Someone else not believing me really isn't my problem as long as I can stay in control of my own food.
    • AlwaysLearning
      If you're just starting out in being gluten free, I would expect it to take months before you learned enough about hidden sources of gluten before you stopped making major mistakes. Ice cream? Not safe unless they say it is gluten free. Spaghetti sauce? Not safe unless is says gluten-free. Natural ingredients? Who knows what's in there. You pretty much need to cook with whole ingredients yourself to avoid it completely. Most gluten-free products should be safe, but while you're in the hypersensitive phase right after going gluten free, you may notice that when something like a microwave meal seems to not be gluten-free … then you find out that it is produced in a shared facility where it can become contaminated. My reactions were much-more severe after going gluten free. The analogy that I use is that you had a whole army of soldiers waiting for some gluten to attack, and now that you took away their target, when the stragglers from the gluten army accidentally wander onto the battlefield, you still have your entire army going out and attacking them. Expect it to take two years before all of the training facilities that were producing your soldiers have fallen into disrepair and are no longer producing soldiers. But that is two years after you stop accidentally glutening yourself. Every time you do eat gluten, another training facility can be built and more soldiers will be waiting to attack. Good luck figuring things out.   
    • Russ H
      This treatment looks promising. Its aim is to provoke immune tolerance of gluten, possibly curing the disease. It passed the phase 2 trial with flying colours, and I came across a post on Reddit by one of the study volunteers. Apparently, the results were good enough that the company is applying for fast track approval.  Anokion Announces Positive Symptom Data from its Phase 2 Trial Evaluating KAN-101 for the Treatment of Celiac Disease https://www.reddit.com/r/Celiac/comments/1krx2wh/kan_101_trial_put_on_hold/
    • Scott Adams
      BTW, we've done other articles on this topic that I wanted to share here (not to condone smoking!):    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.