Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Confused About Test Results


smerrill8

Recommended Posts

smerrill8 Newbie

Hi all,

I have a sister who was diagnosed with celiac disease and said that her Dr told her that all her immediate family members should be tested as well. I don't feel like I have any symptoms of celiac disease (I am tired a lot, but I have 5 kids and eat too much sugar! lol) but I've read that many people don't have typical symptoms but can still have it. I made sure to be eating lots of wheat for quite a while (weeks) before getting the blood tests done.

So today my blood work results came back and it looks like this:

Total IgA: 163 (said normal was 70-400)

Endomysial IgA: Negative

tTG: 14

The Dr said she didn't know how to interpret the results and I should go to a GI specialist for interpretation, but that there was a note on her lab report that the endomysial IgA is 99% specific for celiac and that if it's negative, I probably don't have it. She didn't know about the ttg number. Some websites I've read say that the ttg test can be normal up to 10, some say up to 20, some say up to 30. Does anyone here know which one I should go by?

Any interpretation of my results would be very appreciated! Thanks! :)

Sarah


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ravenwoodglass Mentor

You should get a copy of the actual lab results. Those will show the reference range. Even a low positive is a positive. Was blood work done to measure things like your iron, ferritin, B12, etc? Sometimes we stop being able to absorb nutrients even while our GI system seems to be fine.

Mother of Jibril Enthusiast

Welcome to the group!

IMO, you have two options at this point:

1) Stop eating gluten 100% and assume you have celiac disease

2) Keep eating gluten, get tested for celiac disease on a regular (probably annual) basis, and hope that the damage isn't too bad by the time you get a positive result

I'm sorry your Dr. wasn't able to give you a clear interpretation, but it's a great idea to see a GI specialist! Adults can easily have celiac disease without the "typical" symptoms (abdominal pain, diarrhea, weight loss, etc...).

curiousgeorge Rookie

You need to get the lab ranges to know where you stand on it.

My doc did the antigliadin (igA and IgG) and the TTG blood work and my antigliadin IgA came back at 17 with a range of 20. He said he would consider that positive in and of itself because it was so high (the other two way over the range, 59 and 74 respectively, so it wasn't an issue). My thoughts on the TTG are that your body doesn't pump out antibodies against itself for no reason. Of course I am by no means an expert.

farmer Newbie

Did they do the following test:

endomysial IGA antibody titer

Normal is <1:5

This, according to my GI specialist, is the important test for celiac.

smerrill8 Newbie

Yes, they did the endomysial IGA antibody test, but just came back with a "negative" response - they didn't provide a number.

Ok, so the lab says for the tTG IGA test that over 10 would be considered positive. Why is the 'positive' level over 10 at some labs and over 20 or 30 at other labs? As far as I can tell they're using the same units of measurement - is there one level that should be considered positive for everyone, assuming the same units are used? I was also tested 3 years ago and my tTG level then was 18, but they told me that under 20 was negative. Why? :huh:

Also, if the endomysial IGA antibody screen was negative, isn't that the more important test? My total IGA count was fine - I'm not iga deficient - so why would that be negative with a low positive on ttg? My sister's ttg was close to 200 when she was tested.. Sorry, I guess I'm confused!

curiousgeorge Rookie

Different labs have different ranges and not just for this, for lots of tests. Why? That I can not answer. Even your 18 with a range of 20 is highly suspicious but if your range is 10 and you have a 14 that is a positive. TTG is the autoimmune component and means that your body is doing damnage to itself. TTG is 95% specific as well.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



gfb1 Rookie
Different labs have different ranges and not just for this, for lots of tests. Why? That I can not answer. Even your 18 with a range of 20 is highly suspicious but if your range is 10 and you have a 14 that is a positive. TTG is the autoimmune component and means that your body is doing damnage to itself. TTG is 95% specific as well.

the reason for different ranges of results for different tests is due to different labs having different standard curves. there was a GREAT answer about how these test are done in another thread.

now, imagine this complex process being repeated in different laboratories, by different people, with different equipment and different reagents at different temperatures. the key is that the results should be internally consistent. it's a BIG mistake (and one frequently made by folks who are not trained as analytical chemists) to assume that the numbers are absolute.

you also have to be VERY careful regarding the 'high/low, but normal' discussion. you are either within the 'normal' range, or not. this comparison is a statistical descriptor of having 95% confidence that you are no different from the population average.

one problem is that there is NO SINGLE TEST. a good physician will arrive at a diagnosis based on several tests that match particular symptoms. alternatively, with regard to celiac disease, a lot of people in this forum (and, elsewhere) find through trial and error that they feel better and are no longer sick when they consume a gluten free diet. if the symptoms go away and you feel good (AND have no other problems) -- then perhaps that is the best diagnosis of all.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,561
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    lamps
    Newest Member
    lamps
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • petitojou
      Thank you so much for sharing your experience and I found myself giggling with happiness as I read how your body reached such spring! And I hope that your current journey is also successful!! Definitely starting the food diary! So many amazing advices. And it’s very scary. It really hits all our soft spots as well as our confidence system. Most doctors I went thought I was underage despite being in my late 20s. Right now I look like am I twelve, but is also this body that’s taking so much, so I might as well love it too! Going to make the necessary changes and stay in this path. Thank you again! 🫶
    • petitojou
      Thank you so much for the information and kind message! Reading this transformed how I’ve been viewing my efforts and progress. Guess there’s still a lot to celebrate and also heal 😌  Yes, I’ve been taking it! Just recently started taking a multivitamin supplement and separated vitamin D! I also took chewable Iron polymaltose for ferritin deficiency 2 months ago but was unable to absorb any of it.  Thank you again! Hearing such gentle words from the community makes my body and heart more patient and excited for the future. 
    • ckeyser88
      I am looking for a roomie in Chicago, Denver or Nashville! 
    • Scott Adams
      Your post demonstrates the profound frustration and isolation that so many in the Celiac community feel, and I want to thank you for channeling that experience into advocacy. The medical gaslighting you endured for decades is an unacceptable and, sadly, a common story, and the fact that you now have to "school" your own GI specialist speaks volumes about the critical lack of consistent and updated education. Your idea to make Celiac Disease a reportable condition to public health authorities is a compelling and strategic one. This single action would force the system to formally acknowledge the prevalence and seriousness of the disease, creating a concrete dataset that could drive better research funding, shape medical school curricula, and validate the patient experience in a way that individual stories alone often cannot. It is an uphill battle, but contacting representatives, as you have done with Adam Gray, is exactly how change begins. By framing it as a public health necessity—a matter of patient safety and protection from misdiagnosis and neglect—you are building a powerful case. Your voice and your perseverance, forged through thirty years of struggle, are exactly what this community needs to ensure that no one else has to fight so hard just to be believed and properly cared for.
    • Scott Adams
      I had no idea there is a "Louisville" in Colorado!😉 I thought it was a typo because I always think of the Kentucky city--but good luck!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.