Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Should I Be Gluten Free Too?


kaleesmom

Recommended Posts

kaleesmom Newbie

Hi. I am new to this forum, but am very excited to tell my story. I feel like I, too, can help a lot of people through discussing what my family has been through. My daughter, now 2, was diagnosed with celiac disease. Knowing that it is genetic, I was tested and I encouraged my family to be tested as well. My mother, who has had GI problems since my sister was born (27 years ago) had negative blood tests. She tried the gluten-free diet anyway, and feels amazingly better. My daughter's blood tests were negative also (she was diagnosed by biopsy). My blood tests were negative as well, but I don't think I have experienced any symptoms, other than occasional fatigue. Given all of the complications associated with celiac, its hereditary nature, and the fact that my whole family has had negative blood tests, should I be on a gluten-free diet too?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Lisa Mentor

That's a good question. I suppose it depends on your health history. Many people have been diagnosed with Celiac as a secondary illness to arthritis, lupus, diabetes, thyroid issues... In addition, there are several people on this Board who are asymptomatic.

I believe 20% first degree relatives will develop Celiac.

But, if you are otherwise healthy, perhaps there is no need to be on the gluten free diet, although it is something to be aware of for the future.

heathen Apprentice

My paternal grandfather is diagnosed, and I am diagnosed, but my dad's blood tests are negative. The genetic link isn't really well understood, and there definitely is an environmental trigger that is also not well understood. The current thinking is shifting to think of gluten sensitivities on a spectrum (sort of like autism) with some people having a sensitivity (like lactose intolerance) and others having full-blown celiac disease with the antibodies. There's still so much more to figure out. You and your family might want to be vigilant of any unexplained health changes, and it might be great for the family to go mostly gluten-free if only for helping your daughter with the transition. Best of luck!

psawyer Proficient

Having the genetic factors means you have the potential to develop the disease, but the majority of those with the genes do not. Even with identical genes, such as in identical twins, there are examples where one has celiac disease but the other does not.

If you are concerned, you can avoid gluten. The gluten-free diet is not dangerous or harmful in any way. Because it keeps you away from fast food places, it can be much healthier in many ways. ;)

sugarsue Enthusiast

My 6 yr old is highly gluten intolerant (possible celiac) and can't have even a spec of gluten. My 7 yr old is not as sensitive but her symptoms have been greatly helped by going gluten free. I am allergic to wheat. I never restricted it before I learned about the girls, thinking it didn't really affect me. But I found now that I don't eat it, I get horrible itching, less weight issues, no more sinus infections, no unexplained rashes.....

If I eat wheat, I itch for 12 hrs or so. I could cheat if I wanted to but it's not worth it to me. But also, it helps me to see what my girls will go through when they get older, the decisions they will be faced with, the temptations, the situations. It's not always easy and I like really knowing what that is like.

Anyway, that's just my experience. Now that I see how sick it makes my 6 yr old, it kind of feels like posion to me anyway and I don't have any desire to eat it. Good luck to you and your family with all these changes you are going through!

Susan

kaleesmom Newbie

Thanks for all of the information! I know my wallet and my scale would both benefit if I gave up Subway and Chipotle. ;) As of now, I luckily don't seem to have any symptoms or medical problems (except for fatigue, but I'm pretty sure thats a result of my 2 year old). :rolleyes: I may try the gluten-free diet for a few weeks just to see how I feel. Thanks again for the help and the support!

Pattymom Newbie

It might turn out to be easier to keep a 2 year old gluten free is there isn't much gluten in the house for her to decide to want. It's hard enough to find time to prepare one meal for a family, let alone a second gluten free meal that you tr to keep from getting contaminated--we tried that for the first month or so when i was the only one off. s much easier ot just make meals gluten free for everyone, then if your toddler wants what you are eating, they can always have some.

Patty


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



ChemistMama Contributor

My son was diagnosed at 18 months, in the fall. After I was eating low gluten for about 6 months, it was spring, and me and the husband would sit on the porch and have a beer after a long day with the kids. Guess what? I increased my gluten intake, and lo and behold I got skin problems, which would eventually be diagnosed as DH. If I were you, based on your history, I"d go gluten-free too. Good luck!

PS...you can still go to chipotle, just make sure they change gloves and put everything in a bowl. Yum!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - nanny marley replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      4

      nothing has changed

    2. - trents replied to Scott Adams's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      46

      Supplements for those Diagnosed with Celiac Disease

    3. - trents replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Is it gluten?

    4. - RMJ replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      4

      nothing has changed

    5. - asaT replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      4

      nothing has changed

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,342
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Muhammad
    Newest Member
    Muhammad
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • nanny marley
      I agree there I've tryed this myself to prove I can't eat gluten or lactose and it sets me back for about a month till I have to go back to being very strict to settle again 
    • trents
      You may also need to supplement with B12 as this vitamin is also involved in iron assimilation and is often deficient in long-term undiagnosed celiac disease.
    • trents
      @par18, no, Scott's use of the term "false negative" is intentional and appropriate. The "total IGA" test is not a test used to diagnose celiac disease per se. The IGA immune spectrum response encompasses more than just celiac disease. So, "total IGA" refers to the whole pie, not just the celiac response part of it. But if the whole pie is deficient, the spectrum of components making it up will likely be also, including the celiac disease response spectrum. In other words, IGA deficiency may produce a tTG-IGA score that is negative that might have been positive had there not been IGA deficiency. So, the tTG-IGA negative score may be "false", i.e, inaccurate, aka, not to be trusted.
    • RMJ
      This may be the problem. Every time you eat gluten it is like giving a booster shot to your immune system, telling it to react and produce antibodies again.
    • asaT
      Scott, I am mostly asymptomatic. I was diagnosed based on high antibodies, low ferritin (3) and low vitamin D (10). I wasn't able to get in for the biopsy until 3 months after the blood test came back. I was supposed to keep eating gluten during this time. Well why would I continue doing something that I know to be harmful for 3 more months to just get this test? So I did quit gluten and had the biopsy. It was negative for celiacs. I continued gluten free with iron supps and my ferritin came back up to a reasonable, but not great level of around 30-35.  Could there be something else going on? Is there any reason why my antibodies would be high (>80) with a negative biopsy? could me intestines have healed that quickly (3 months)?  I'm having a hard time staying gluten free because I am asymptomatic and i'm wondering about that biopsy. I do have the celiacs gene, and all of the antibody tests have always come back high. I recently had them tested again. Still very high. I am gluten free mostly, but not totally. I will occasionally eat something with gluten, but try to keep to a minimum. It's really hard when the immediate consequences are nil.  with high antibodies, the gene, but a negative biopsy (after 3 months strict gluten-free), do i really have celiacs? please say no. lol. i think i know the answer.  Asa
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.