Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Genetic Testing


Genna'smom

Recommended Posts

Genna'smom Apprentice

Hi all

My now 3 yr old had genetic tesing and they told me we were still in the same boat. One came back negative and one came back positive. Can anyone tell me what this means. I was so hoping it would be negative and we could start life over again. I go to her GI specialist on Friday so I am going to ask for a copy, but in the meantime if anyone can shed some light on this I would appreciate it...

Bonnie


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



happygirl Collaborator

There are two genes that have been highly associated with Celiac - HLA DQ2 and HLA DQ8. Of diagnosed Celiacs,95-98% have one or both of the genes.

However, about 30-40% of Americans have one of both of the genes. Best estimates are that 1 in 133 (just less than 1%) of Americans have Celiac. So, having the gene does not equal having Celiac. But, if you don't have the gene, your risk of developing Celiac is much less than compared to someone who does have the gene.

Knowing that you have the gene is just one piece to the puzzle. She could have Celiac now, or develop it years down the road, or never develop it.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Heatherisle replied to Heatherisle's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Blood results

    2. - trents replied to Heatherisle's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Blood results

    3. - Heatherisle posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Blood results

    4. - lehum replied to lehum's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      22

      nuts.com -- no longer Celiac safe?

    5. - Scott Adams replied to lehum's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      22

      nuts.com -- no longer Celiac safe?


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      130,898
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Claireuk
    Newest Member
    Claireuk
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Heatherisle
      Hi Thanks for answering so quickly. Not sure about any other blood tests, all I have is a copy of what my daughter sent to me. Hopefully she’ll get the biopsy soon cos she’s really anxious about the whole thing, but she tends to have a lot of anxiety anyway and has done for a long time
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Heatherisle! Yes, not uncommon for multiple celiac antibody tests to not agree. The Endomysial IGA was the first antibody test developed to detect celiac disease. It is expensive to run and has largely been replaced by the tTG-IGA. But some physicians, particularly those who have been in practice for awhile, still order the EMA. It's a good test. Was there a "total IGA" test run to check for IGA deficiency?  
    • Heatherisle
      Hi  New to this so bear with me!!! My daughter was told a few years ago she probably had IBS but been feeling generally worse lately Recent IgA TTG Ab blood test indicative of coeliac at 19 U/ml but Endomysial IgA Abs negative. Awaiting appointment for biopsy , so was wondering if anyone else has had these differing results. Thank you
    • lehum
      The article was shocking - and horrifying - to read. For me it’s a good argument to cook as many fresh foods as possible. I personally can’t do grain free because I lose weight too quickly and don’t feel full, but I will be sticking to companies I trust like Lundberg for rice.    I live in Germany and thankfully, labeling here is more transparent and more trustworthy than it appears to be in the U.S. these days (where I’m also originally from).  I am so sorry to hear this! May you heal quickly. ❤️
    • Scott Adams
      Yes, it is unfortunate that the GFCO seems to have a policy that allows companies that it certifies to lower their guard the longer that they've had their certification. After jumping though the harder GFCO testing requirements for long enough they seem to "rubber stamp" companies and allow them to keep their certification with much less testing going forward. To me this is like having a restaurant where you train the staff one time about how do handle gluten-free foods, and do the training less and less over time, even though you might have high turnover in the industry. People in big food production and supply companies come and go, just like in restaurants, and it's important never to lower your guard.
×
×
  • Create New...