Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Testing Kids - How Far To Push When It's Negative?


T.H.

Recommended Posts

T.H. Community Regular

This is my first post here, so sorry if it's a bit scattered!

My father has celiac disease, and I was just diagnosed with it 9 days ago - eek, big changes! But since that made 2 in our family, I immediately requested the celiac blood panel for my kids. My 11 year old daughter came back positive for celiac, and my 8 year old son came back negative.

I don't know if the doctor is going to suggest biopsy for my daughter to confirm or not, and I would welcome anyone's experience in having the biopsy done for their children, or avoided for their children.

Also, I am worried about my son. He already has issues with consuming dairy, and has all his life. And he's tiny - at least a head shorter than the average kid his age. He's active, but often has these mood issues, like he's tired and cranky and can't 'cope.' In the past, we've noticed him like this when he accidentally has dairy, but recently, I'm starting to notice it when I can't think of anything that might be causing it, not even simply being tired and cranky. Or maybe I should say, there's this subtle difference when he really IS just tired and cranky, and it's not the same as what I'm seeing now periodically.

So I very much worry about whether we are getting a false negative with him, but I don't really want to subject him to unnecessary tests. Has anyone else run into this with their own children? What did you do?

As an added note, he is likely going to be going on a gluten free diet, in any case, because I'm the cook, and with two of us to cook for who are gluten free...the whole family is going to get to enjoy that diet too. :-) But I would hate to miss something important about his health by not testing, and I know if he's going gluten free, the tests would be useless later...

So, again...any words of advice, experience with this? Any help you could give would be much appreciated!

Thanks,

T.H.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



runningcrazy Contributor

Hi, Im fairly new to this too so im sorry if this isnt a huge help.

I would say be strict with him being gluten free as well, see if you notice any changes. I have had 3 negative blood tests, but we ordered an enterolab test to see what it says, and ive been gluten free nearly 2 weeks now and i feel great. So i think even with the negative tests i react to gluten.

The blood tests can check for celiac, not intolerance, there is the possibility of that.

If you want some answers, i would consider looking into enterolab tests if you can pay for it. I got the gene testing and the stool test to check for antibodies. You may or may not want to do the gene test because you know you must have the gene since you have celiac.

It can tell you if your son is reacting to gluten. It is much more sensitve than the blood test. Type in enterolab in the thread searcfh box on this website and youll see a lot more info. It takes about 3 days to recieve your kit and 2-3 weeks for results. Myh results should be here soon!

good luck~

Rondar2001 Apprentice

Hi, my daughter had an endoscopy to confirm her diagnosis when she was 7. We felt that having a definitive diagnosis would be important as she gets older. There is no questioning a positive biopsy and hopefully this will be a tool to keep her gluten free as she gets into her teens and may want to cheat on the diet. A confirmed diagnosis also gives us a little more credibility when dealing with teachers and family in our effort to keep her gluten free.

The biopsy itself was quick and painless. She was at the hospital at 7 am and home by noon with no lasting effects.

For you son, I would discuss his symptoms with his doctor and see if they would biopsy him as well. In addition to checking for celiac, they may see another issue that could be causing his symptoms.

The choice to biopsy is of course yours, these are just the reasons that we decided to go ahead with it.

Good luck!

momxyz Contributor
Hi, my daughter had an endoscopy to confirm her diagnosis when she was 7. We felt that having a definitive diagnosis would be important as she gets older. There is no questioning a positive biopsy and hopefully this will be a tool to keep her gluten free as she gets into her teens and may want to cheat on the diet. A confirmed diagnosis also gives us a little more credibility when dealing with teachers and family in our effort to keep her gluten free.

The biopsy itself was quick and painless. She was at the hospital at 7 am and home by noon with no lasting effects.

For you son, I would discuss his symptoms with his doctor and see if they would biopsy him as well. In addition to checking for celiac, they may see another issue that could be causing his symptoms.

The choice to biopsy is of course yours, these are just the reasons that we decided to go ahead with it.

Good luck!

if the biopsy comes back positive, I agree, then you have a confirmed diagnosis.

But since his antibodies were negative, the biopsy could very well come back negative. Some people with celiacs don't present with GI symptoms as their first or main problem......

I think the gene testing would be very useful.

DanAbimytwomiracles Newbie

An elimination diet is just as accurate as a biopsy. And I don't ever see a need to put a child under general anesthesia when there is a perfectly acceptable non-surgical method to determine an answer. With my daughter, who had more mild, atypical celiac symptoms and a negative blood panel, we knew within 3 days that things were better, and after 4 weeks it was amazing the difference. Giving her a gluten challenge after those 4 weeks made all the symptoms return. Our final proof was that after 1.5 years of barely growing (from 2-3.5 she gained 8 ounces), she then gained 5 lbs in one year.

T.H. Community Regular

Thanks for all the replies! I'm thinking I may avoid testing any further for the little guy and simply keep good track of how he's reacting to the gluten-free diet. Thanks!

T.H.

balmerhon Rookie

My 3 yo son's blood work came back negative. He had an endoscopic biopsy and that also came back negative for celiac. BUT they did find allergy cells (eosinophilic colitis). This is despite his RAST tests coming back negative as well.

We did 2 weeks of gluten free with no change in his symptoms (diarrhea). This was prior to the endoscopy. We're now doing dairy-free. We know he now has an allergy, but we don't know yet what it is. We may have to revisit a gluten elimination if dairy does not seem to be the problem.

So, bear in mind, it's not always celiac. But blood tests for younger kids are often incorrect.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,643
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    James W.
    Newest Member
    James W.
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I agree, there can be contamination at many points--milling is another possible source of contamination for any flours.
    • trents
      Keep in mind that with manufactured food products, "gluten free" doesn't equate to no gluten. Things that are naturally gluten free can be cross-contaminated with gluten in the field, in shipping and in processing. In the U.S. companies can use the gluten free label as long as the product doesn't exceed 20ppm of gluten. That amount still may cause a reaction in some people.
    • deanna1ynne
      Dd10 was tested for celiac four years ago bc two siblings were dx’d (positive labs and biopsies). Her results at the time were positive ema  and ttg (7x the UL), but a negative biopsy. We checked again three months later and her ttg was still positive (4x the UL), but ema and biopsy were negative. Doc said it was “potential celiac” and to keep eating gluten, but we were concerned about harming her growth and development while young and had her go gluten-free because we felt the labs and ema in particular were very suggestive of early celiac, despite the negative biopsies. She also had stomach aches and lethargy when eating it. We just felt it’d be better to be safe than sorry. Now, four years later, she doesn’t want to be gluten-free if she doesn’t “have to be,” so underwent a 12 week gluten challenge. She had labs done before starting and all looked great (celiac panel all negative, as expected.) Surprisingly, she experienced no noticeable symptoms when she began eating gluten again, which we felt was a positive sign. However, 12 weeks in, her labs are positive again (ttg 4x the UL and ema positive again as well). Doc says that since she feels fine and her previous two biopsies showed nothing, she can just keep eating gluten and we could maybe biopsy again in two years. I was looking up the ema test and the probability of having not just one but two false positives, and it seems ridiculously low.  Any advice? Would you biopsy again? She’s old enough at this point that I really feel I need her buy-in to keep her gluten-free, and she feels that if the doc says it’s fine, then that’s the final word — which makes me inclined to biopsy again and hope that it actually shows damage this time (not because I want her to have celiac like her sisters, but because I kind of think she already does have it, and seeing the damage now would save her more severe damage in the long run that would come from just continuing to eat gluten for a few more years before testing again.)  Our doc is great - we really like him. But we are very confused and want to protect her. One of her older sibs stopped growing and has lots of teeth problems and all that jazz from not catching the celiac disease sooner, and we don’t want to get to that point with the younger sis. fwiw- she doesn’t mind the biopsy at all. It’s at a children’s hospital and she thinks it’s kind of fun. So it’s not like that would stress her out or anything.
    • Inkie
      Thanks for the replies. I already use a gluten-free brand of buckwheat flakes I occasionally get itchy bumps. I'm still reviewing all my food products. I occasionally eat prepackaged gluten-free crackers and cookies, so I'll stop using those. I use buckwheat flakes and Doves Farm flour as a base for baking. Would you recommend eliminating those as well? It's a constant search.
    • Wheatwacked
      Gluten free food is not fortified with vitamins and minerals as regular food is.  Vitamin deficiencies are common especially in recently diagnosed persons,  Get a 25(OH)Vitamin D blood test. And work on raising it.  The safe upper blood level is around 200 nmol/L.    "Low serum levels of 25(OH)D have been associated with increased risk of autoimmune disease onset and/or high disease activity. The role of vitamin D in autoimmune diseases   🏋️‍♂️Good job!   I find the commercial milk will give me mild stomach burn at night, while pasture/grassfed only milk does not bother me at all.  While you are healing, listen to your body.  If it hurts to eat something, eat something else.  You may be able to eat it later, or maybe it is just not good for you.  Lower your Omega 6 to 3 ratio of what you eat.  Most omega 6 fatty acids are inflammation causing.    The standard american diet omega 6:3 ratio is estimated at upward of 14:1.  Thats why fish oil works
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.