Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Have More Questions & Need More Advice Please :)

mom26boys

Recommended Posts

mom26boys Apprentice
mom26boys
Posted

OK, so I went to see a gi today and showed him my original test result. I had an endomysial ab (iga) screen and it came back positive. There was also a titer done which came back at 1:5 (I have no idea what that means). He told me that my gp ordered the wrong test and that the endomysial ab screen is not an accurate test.

He explained the different ways to check for celiac and the different tests they do (which I already knew all about). He gave me the option of having a Tissue Transglutaminase AB IGA/IGG and an IGA Level and said that if the numbers are high enough, he wouldn't even bother doing the biopsy. He also said I could go with the genetic test, but that its a lot more costly. I asked him if he could give me an order for both and I would decide which test I wanted, and he did. So here are my questions for you:

1. What is the endomysial ab screen? Is it an outdated test? From what I understand it is 100% specific to celiac, but he doesn't seem to think so.

2. Based on the fact that the endomysial screen came back positive, would you do the genetic test or the other tests (TTG AB IGA/IGG and IGA)? I have read that there is a lot of false positives with those.

3. Should I do both tests? If so, has anyone had experience with their insurance co. not paying for the genetic test? I figured that the positive endomysal screen would warrant a genetic test, but he said not for a gastroenetrologist, and that they may not pay for it. I would love to just go ahead and do both tests but I'm concerned about the insurance kicking back the genetic test and having to pay for it out of pocket. I have an HSA and my deductible is met so everything is covered at 100%.

Thank you so much for your help and advice! I have gotten so much more from this forum than any other site I've gone to.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Roda Rising Star
Roda
Posted

Your insurance should pay for the Iga(checked to see if you are deficient or not which helps to validate the other tests) and the TTG Iga/Igg. You will have to check with your policy on the genetic testing. Mine won't pay for genetic testing at all. I found out when my youngest son was 14 mo old and being screened genetically for LAD (leukocyte adhesion deficiency). I had already taken him in and they drew his blood, when the lady from my work called me and told me they would not pay. She had the nerve to stop the lab from sending his blood to Mayo Clinic in in MN (the only lab at the time that performed the test) until she talked to me. I did not care if they paid for that test, we needed to know if he had it because it would have inpacted his care greatly. As a result I had to take him back in and get stuck again and I was furious. Anyway, I have not had myself genetic tested or my two boys because of the ins. not paying. For me it won't change anything (I am curious though) and I will annually have the boys screened or checked sooner if symptoms should arise. It probably would not hurt, but it's up to you, to have the rest of the pannel done. I didn't and wish I did so I would have a baseline to go on. I only had the TTG done. If you do decide you should have the anti gliadin antibodies done also.

LDJofDenver Apprentice
LDJofDenver
Posted

Here is a link to the University of Chicago Celiac Center:

Open Original Shared Link

It discusses the different tests used and why, etc. Maybe it will help.

I'd go for the blood panels first, especially since they're typically covered under medical insurance. Then if you get what you feel is a false negative, you can always go to the genetic testing to see if you even carry the gene.

Also, many celiacs never get a confirmed medical diagnosis -- they just, usually out of desperation and years of misdiagnosis, went on a gluten free diet because many of their symptoms led them there, and all their problems disappeared. For many, that is enough of a diagnosis. It is an individual thing.

mom26boys Apprentice
mom26boys
Posted
  • Author
Your insurance should pay for the Iga(checked to see if you are deficient or not which helps to validate the other tests) and the TTG Iga/Igg. You will have to check with your policy on the genetic testing. Mine won't pay for genetic testing at all. I found out when my youngest son was 14 mo old and being screened genetically for LAD (leukocyte adhesion deficiency). I had already taken him in and they drew his blood, when the lady from my work called me and told me they would not pay. She had the nerve to stop the lab from sending his blood to Mayo Clinic in in MN (the only lab at the time that performed the test) until she talked to me. I did not care if they paid for that test, we needed to know if he had it because it would have inpacted his care greatly. As a result I had to take him back in and get stuck again and I was furious. Anyway, I have not had myself genetic tested or my two boys because of the ins. not paying. For me it won't change anything (I am curious though) and I will annually have the boys screened or checked sooner if symptoms should arise. It probably would not hurt, but it's up to you, to have the rest of the pannel done. I didn't and wish I did so I would have a baseline to go on. I only had the TTG done. If you do decide you should have the anti gliadin antibodies done also.

Thank you. You make a lot of sense. I'm sorry about what happened to your little guy. That would make me furious too!!! Yes, whatever the tests say, it will not change anything for me. The proof for me was going gluten-free for 3 weeks and thats all I need to know. I'm more interested (and of course curious) in order to test my boys so they don't spend years trying to figure out what is wrong with them like I did. I suspect my dad and his mom had it and so thats why I'm being so adamant about being tested, even though the doctors think I'm a nut. I will have the rest of the panel done, since my ins. will pay 100% and I'll ask about the genetic test. Thanks again for your advice.

mom26boys Apprentice
mom26boys
Posted
  • Author
Here is a link to the University of Chicago Celiac Center:

Open Original Shared Link

It discusses the different tests used and why, etc. Maybe it will help.

I'd go for the blood panels first, especially since they're typically covered under medical insurance. Then if you get what you feel is a false negative, you can always go to the genetic testing to see if you even carry the gene.

Also, many celiacs never get a confirmed medical diagnosis -- they just, usually out of desperation and years of misdiagnosis, went on a gluten free diet because many of their symptoms led them there, and all their problems disappeared. For many, that is enough of a diagnosis. It is an individual thing.

Yes, you are right. I have made up my mind that no matter what these tests say, as soon as I go to the lab, I am gluten free! That will have to be enough of a diagnosis for me. I am at the point of desperation and years of misdiagnosis, and as someone else put it who responded to one of my previous points, no matter what these doctors say, I don't need their permission to go gluten free. So yes, I will go ahead and have the panel done first and do the genetic afterwards. Thank you for the link you sent me too. It did answer a lot of questions. I was mainly confused because I thought the endomysial screen was 100% specific to celiac, but I will get the rest of them done too as that will hopefully paint a better picture. Thanks again!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,329
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    klkarius
    Newest Member
    klkarius
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • knitty kitty
      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      @Jane02, I hear you about the kale and collard greens.  I don't do dairy and must eat green leafies, too, to get sufficient calcium.  I must be very careful because some calcium supplements are made from ground up crustacean shells.  When I was deficient in Vitamin D, I took high doses of Vitamin D to correct the deficiency quickly.  This is safe and nontoxic.  Vitamin D level should be above 70 nmol/L.  Lifeguards and indigenous Pacific Islanders typically have levels between 80-100 nmol/L.   Levels lower than this are based on amount needed to prevent disease like rickets and osteomalacia. We need more thiamine when we're physically ill, emotionally and mentally stressed, and if we exercise like an athlete or laborer.  We need more thiamine if we eat a diet high in simple carbohydrates.  For every 500 kcal of carbohydrates, we need 500-1000 mg more of thiamine to process the carbs into energy.  If there's insufficient thiamine the carbs get stored as fat.  Again, recommended levels set for thiamine are based on minimum amounts needed to prevent disease.  This is often not adequate for optimum health, nor sufficient for people with absorption problems such as Celiac disease.  Gluten free processed foods are not enriched with vitamins like their gluten containing counterparts.  Adding a B Complex and additional thiamine improves health for Celiacs.  Thiamine is safe and nontoxic even in high doses.  Thiamine helps the mitochondria in cells to function.  Thiamine interacts with each of the other B vitamins.  They are all water soluble and easily excreted if not needed. Interesting Reading: Clinical trial: B vitamins improve health in patients with coeliac disease living on a gluten-free diet https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19154566/ Safety and effectiveness of vitamin D mega-dose: A systematic review https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34857184/ High dose dietary vitamin D allocates surplus calories to muscle and growth instead of fat via modulation of myostatin and leptin signaling https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38766160/ Safety of High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31746327/ Vitamins and Celiac Disease: Beyond Vitamin D https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11857425/ Investigating the therapeutic potential of tryptophan and vitamin A in modulating immune responses in celiac disease: an experimental study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40178602/ Investigating the Impact of Vitamin A and Amino Acids on Immune Responses in Celiac Disease Patients https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10814138/
    • Jane02
      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      By Jane02 · Posted

      Thank you so much @knitty kitty for this insightful information! I would have never considered fractionated coconut oil to be a potential source of GI upset. I will consider all the info you shared. Very interesting about the Thiamine deficiency.  I've tracked daily averages of my intake in a nutrition software. The only nutrient I can't consistently meet from my diet is vitamin D. Calcium is a hit and miss as I rely on vegetables, dark leafy greens as a major source, for my calcium intake. I'm able to meet it when I either eat or juice a bundle of kale or collard greens daily haha. My thiamine intake is roughly 120% of my needs, although I do recognize that I may not be absorbing all of these nutrients consistently with intermittent unintentional exposures to gluten.  My vitamin A intake is roughly 900% (~6400 mcg/d) of my needs as I eat a lot of sweet potato, although since it's plant-derived vitamin A (beta-carotene) apparently it's not likely to cause toxicity.  Thanks again! 
    • knitty kitty
      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      Hello, @Jane02,  I take Naturewise D 3.  It contains olive oil.   Some Vitamin D supplements, like D Drops, are made with fractionated coconut oil which can cause digestive upsets.  Fractionated coconut oil is not the same as coconut oil used for cooking.  Fractionated coconut oil has been treated for longer shelf life, so it won't go bad in the jar, and thus may be irritating to the digestive system. I avoid supplements made with soy because many people with Celiac Disease also react to soy.  Mixed tocopherols, an ingredient in Thornes Vitamin D, may be sourced from soy oil.  Kirkland's has soy on its ingredient list. I avoid things that might contain or be exposed to crustaceans, like Metagenics says on its label.  I have a crustacean/shellfish/fish allergy.  I like Life Extension Bioactive Complete B Complex.  I take additional Thiamine B 1 in the form Benfotiamine which helps the intestines heal, Life Extension MegaBenfotiamine. Thiamine is needed to activate Vitamin D.   Low thiamine can make one feel like they are getting glutened after a meal containing lots of simple carbohydrates like white rice, or processed gluten free foods like cookies and pasta.   It's rare to have a single vitamin deficiency.  The water soluble B Complex vitamins should be supplemented together with additional Thiamine in the form Benfotiamine and Thiamine TTFD (tetrahydrofurfuryl disulfide) to correct subclinical deficiencies that don't show up on blood tests.  These are subclinical deficiencies within organs and tissues.  Blood is a transportation system.  The body will deplete tissues and organs in order to keep a supply of thiamine in the bloodstream going to the brain and heart.   If you're low in Vitamin D, you may well be low in other fat soluble vitamins like Vitamin A and Vitamin K. Have you seen a dietician?
    • Scott Adams
      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I do not know this, but since they are labelled gluten-free, and are not really a product that could easily be contaminated when making them (there would be not flour in the air of such a facility, for example), I don't really see contamination as something to be concerned about for this type of product. 
    • trents
      Desperately need a vitamin D supplement. I've reacted to most brands I've tried.

      By trents · Posted

      Contact them.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.