Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Should I Or Shouldn't I?


kthies2

Recommended Posts

kthies2 Apprentice

So I just read a book on celiac disease and all of they symptoms sound like my life story. I immediately went to my general doc to see if I can be tested. She ordered the Celiac Panel blood test so I just need to go to the lab and have that done. Here is my concern. Long ago, I removed the obvious wheat containing foods from my diet MOST of the time. I just don't eat them usually because they cause pain. However, I do eat them occasionally in small amounts. I have never removed gluten 100% from my diet but I eat very little of it for the most part. I read on the internet that this test can give inconclusive results if you have removed gluten from your diet prior to taking it. Is this true and what should I do? I hate to go gordge on wheat for 3 months just so I can take this test and actually get a confirmed diagnosis! HELP! I just want to know once and for all what my issue is so I can begin to heal my poor body.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



TrillumHunter Enthusiast

Yes, you need to be eating gluten to have an accurate test. If you've been reading then you understand that the test measures the level of antibodies produced in response to consuming gluten.

I would consider your results skewed at best if you haven't been consuming gluten. If an official diagnosis is important to you, you've possibly wasted your time with the previous panel.

Sorry to say, but that's where testing stands right now.

kthies2 Apprentice
Yes, you need to be eating gluten to have an accurate test. If you've been reading then you understand that the test measures the level of antibodies produced in response to consuming gluten.

I would consider your results skewed at best if you haven't been consuming gluten. If an official diagnosis is important to you, you've possibly wasted your time with the previous panel.

Sorry to say, but that's where testing stands right now.

kthies2 Apprentice

Thank you for the response and info!

How long do I need to add gluten back into my diet if I want the test to be conclusive? Are we talking a week or two or are we talking months of it?

Jean'sBrainonGluten Newbie

People list different times but between 6 and 8 weeks on daily gluten. You should check the web to get a sense of how much you need to eat each day. I think, for example, that one slice a day isn't enough to trigger the response.

The thing about not getting tested is that, for me at least, as long as I didn't have a positive diagnosis I felt like I was just a little sensitive and could get away with small amounts of gluten occasionally. I just didn't have the emotional wherewithal to continue to do the extra work it took to eat gluten free at home and at restaurants and other peoples' homes - especially a few relatives who thought it was ridiculous for me to need to eat differently. Sadly, they didn't pay the price for my continuing gluten eating, I did.

If you can manage it eating the stuff and getting the test could be worth it.

Good luck!

kthies2 Apprentice
People list different times but between 6 and 8 weeks on daily gluten. You should check the web to get a sense of how much you need to eat each day. I think, for example, that one slice a day isn't enough to trigger the response.

The thing about not getting tested is that, for me at least, as long as I didn't have a positive diagnosis I felt like I was just a little sensitive and could get away with small amounts of gluten occasionally. I just didn't have the emotional wherewithal to continue to do the extra work it took to eat gluten free at home and at restaurants and other peoples' homes - especially a few relatives who thought it was ridiculous for me to need to eat differently. Sadly, they didn't pay the price for my continuing gluten eating, I did.

If you can manage it eating the stuff and getting the test could be worth it.

Good luck!

Fiddle-Faddle Community Regular

At this point, your results will likely be negative until you've been on the equivalent of 3-4 slices of bread per day for at least a couple of months.

If you KNOW this causes you pain, that might be your answer right there.

You do not need a diagnosis to try a 100% gluten-free diet, nor do you need a doctor's permission, or even approval.

You DO need to keep track of your symptoms, and how diet affects them. You may need to eliminate other things from your diet, like dairy products, at least temporarily, as they can prevent the healing of gluten-damaged intestines).

If your intestinal symptoms do not resolve by diet alone,, then I think that you ought to be prepared to look further for answers. At that point, you might need to consider an endoscopy/biopsy, which is an invasive procedure, not to rule celiac in or out, as it is not the most accurate diagnostic tool, but to see what else might be going on.

Finally, be aware that some people choose to avoid an official diagnosis of celiac, as insurance companies have denied people coverage based on celiac status ("pre-existing condition"). Given the value system of the insurance companies ($$ being more important to them than health or even life), that might be something to consider.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,204
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Sarahmegan
    Newest Member
    Sarahmegan
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.