Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Test Results


The Glutenator

Recommended Posts

The Glutenator Contributor

Hello,

I have been having some gastrointestinal symptoms for a while now and my doctor finally ran a blood test for celiac. My initial symptoms were bloating (looked pregnant), gas, very frequent trips to the washroom, food cravings, and fatigue. As I understand it my immunoglobin levels were very high, even for celiacs (my levels were 52 and normal is less than 20 according to my doctor). I then went for a biopsy and went gluten-free immediately after that. After about 5 weeks I am feeling a lot better. The gas went away very quickly and the bloating and other GI symptoms are getting much better. My energy level is also up 110%. Imagine my shock, then, when the biopsy came back negative. My doctor said he hadn't seen this before and said the blood test almost never gave false positives. I am completely convinced I have celiac disease, especially since the sensitivity of the blood test is so high and all my symptoms are going away, but the negative biopsy was frustrating. My doctor won't officially call me a celiac without the positive biopsy, but isn't recommending a gluten challenge and second test because all my symptoms will come back. Has anyone else had a positive blood test and negative biopsy? What are your suggestions from here? Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



elle's mom Contributor

Hello,

I have been having some gastrointestinal symptoms for a while now and my doctor finally ran a blood test for celiac. My initial symptoms were bloating (looked pregnant), gas, very frequent trips to the washroom, food cravings, and fatigue. As I understand it my immunoglobin levels were very high, even for celiacs (my levels were 52 and normal is less than 20 according to my doctor). I then went for a biopsy and went gluten-free immediately after that. After about 5 weeks I am feeling a lot better. The gas went away very quickly and the bloating and other GI symptoms are getting much better. My energy level is also up 110%. Imagine my shock, then, when the biopsy came back negative. My doctor said he hadn't seen this before and said the blood test almost never gave false positives. I am completely convinced I have celiac disease, especially since the sensitivity of the blood test is so high and all my symptoms are going away, but the negative biopsy was frustrating. My doctor won't officially call me a celiac without the positive biopsy, but isn't recommending a gluten challenge and second test because all my symptoms will come back. Has anyone else had a positive blood test and negative biopsy? What are your suggestions from here? Thanks!

False negatives on biopsies are very common. It just means that there are some areas of your small intestine that aren't completely demolished and your surgeon managed to biopsy this area rather than an area that has been affected. The damage to your intestine may but patchy, but that doesn't mean you do not have celiac disease. Although with the positive dietary response, it does mean you can at least consider yourself non-celiac gluten sensitive. Your doctor should know this, if he does not then I would be apprehensive in trusting him to further manage your condition.

I would recommend the book "Healthier Without Wheat" by Dr. Stephen Wangen. It explains all about the different tests for celiac and gluten sensitivity and does a good job of differentiating between the two.

Although the biopsy is still considered the "gold standard" for the celiac diagnosis, there's nothing saying you can't just go on eating gluten free without it if it makes you feel better, it's up to you though; don't let your doctor tell you to go back on gluten. All you'd be doing by going back to gluten is waiting until it further damages your health. This is very unfortunate.

Just as a side note too, I'm not exactly sure 52 is a really high level (I've heard of some being in the 100's or even over 1000 as in my daughter's case), but that doesn't mean anything. It is true that false positives are slim to none, so I would definately not entertain that idea. It's like pregnancy, either you are or you aren't, the value of the number is irrelevant. Good luck to you.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      129,875
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Kelly Bates
    Newest Member
    Kelly Bates
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.3k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • RMJ
      I had an endoscopy where there was no visible damage but biopsies showed damage. I even asked beforehand if the endoscope had good enough magnification to see the villi!  I hope you get a clear answer from the biopsies.
    • terrymouse
      I have an endoscopy booked for mid-September to test for Celiac. My gp seems convinced it is celiac and I should eliminate gluten right away, but the gastroenterologist I was referred to says if I'm totally gluten-free then they won't be able to detect celiac from the endoscopy, and I should load up on gluten 2 weeks before the test. So I guess I shouldn't eliminate gluten then? Or stop and start again closer to the appointment date. But I'm also on the wait list in case they can get me in sooner, because I'm losing weight. I don't want to have to go back and do it over again if I can help it. They also were unsure if there isn't something else wrong with my stomach, so that's a possibility. I don't have the details but from what I understood my blood tests results were positive but on the low end. So I'm getting mixed up here, do I go gluten-free or not? Would 2.5 months of being gluten-free make any noticable difference? 
    • knitty kitty
      Being low in B12, Folate B9, ferritin, zinc and copper sounds consistent with anemia which can often occur with Celiac.  What did your doctor recommend? What about your Vitamin D?  It helps regulate the immune system.  
    • ehb
      @knitty kitty thank you I am exploring these options, I really appreciate all the suggestions and info. I am only slightly below the normal range for folate, zinc and copper. And in the low end of the normal range for B12, ferritin, and vitamin A. I’m good for carotene magnesium and iron, but I’ve been taking 400 mg magnesium daily 
    • Alibu
      I just had my endoscopy the other day and the doctor took 12 samples because he said if we're going to find something we're going to find it today LOL. But when he got down there, he said everything looked good. So I have it in my head again that it's going to be negative because everyone I've heard of who had a positive biopsy had their endoscopies where the doctor was like yep, I can see the damage. My tissues all look great apparently. So if they come back negative, I'm not sure where to go from here. Could it still be a non-celiac gluten sensitivity even with my blood work? I thought NCGS didn't show up on blood tests. Is it possible that the biopsy still comes back positive even if everything looked healthy on endoscope? I had it done at a big hospital in the state, so I would think they'd have the kind of equipment where they'd be able to see it well. I even have pictures in my report and they don't seem to have the damage that others have seen.
×
×
  • Create New...