Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Help With 2 Yr Old


dnyc

Could it be celiacs  

2 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

dnyc Newbie

My daughter's pediatric GI though it was celiacs in the beginning, but when she was 18 months she had an endoscope done and it came back negative, but when I go to all the sites and search her symptoms it always comes back as celiacs. I wasn't able to breastfeed her, but she went on rice cereal at 3 months (by doctor orders, she was slow to gain) and at 4 months she was started on other foods. The diarrhea is often mucousy and acidic, though no blood.

So basically her symptoms are:

-slow weight gain

-diarrhea starts at 4 months with solids, reflux symptoms started, bloated belly started

-weight loss at 8 months with the start of some table foods, reflux symptoms get worse

-allergy testing at 9 months, no immediate or delayed allergies

-occasional constipation

-height growth slows, weight gain is very slow with bouts of weight loss

-low to no appetite (when things get really bad she'll only eat cheese and drink milk and things get better)

-IgA levels are 7, slight anemia, other tests are normal


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Luvbeingamommy Contributor

Have you ever thought of testing her with Enterolabs?? They check the levels in her stool. I would definitely reccomend it, we did it with our 2 1/2 year old.

Testing for Celiac in children can be very tough to get positive results, more so then adults for sure.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

Have you ever thought of testing her with Enterolabs?? They check the levels in her stool. I would definitely reccomend it, we did it with our 2 1/2 year old.

Testing for Celiac in children can be very tough to get positive results, more so then adults for sure.

I agree completely. You can also do a gluten free trial with her even while waiting for the Enterolab tests and results, since she has already had blood and biopsy. False negatives for children are even more common than for adults.

RoseTapper Newbie

I just returned from the annual conference of the Gluten Intolerance Group at which a pediatric expert from New Zealand presented a number of case studies of babies and young children. Your child's symptoms match exactly one of the case studies, and Dr. Ford explained at length that, yes, such a child should be placed on a gluten-free diet. He feels that it is unimportant to have all of the tests be positive when symptoms are so obvious and that if the child improves on a gluten-free diet, it should be considered a slam-dunk case of either celiac or gluten intolerance. He said that while there may be doctors who disagree with him, the health of the child is the most important thing.

dnyc Newbie

Have you ever thought of testing her with Enterolabs?? They check the levels in her stool. I would definitely reccomend it, we did it with our 2 1/2 year old.

Testing for Celiac in children can be very tough to get positive results, more so then adults for sure.

So if I go the enterolabs route, which tests will I need to do to get the most accurate results? After I do this I'll be going gluten free with her. That to me will be the overall test. Thank you for the input

I just checked the prices for the labs and there is NO WAY I can afford them. I'm a single mother and even with the help I have...I just can't afford it. I'm just going to try the gluten free diet and hope it helps her

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - par18 replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      9

      Is it gluten?

    2. - SilkieFairy replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      6

      IBS-D vs Celiac

    3. - par18 replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      6

      IBS-D vs Celiac

    4. - trents replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      6

      IBS-D vs Celiac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,340
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Abbyyoung417
    Newest Member
    Abbyyoung417
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • par18
      Scott, I agree with everything you said except the term "false negative". It should be a "true negative" just plain negative. I actually looked up true/false negative/positive as it pertains to testing. The term "false negative" would be correct if you are positive (have anti-bodies) and the test did not pick them up. That would be a problem with the "test" itself. If you were gluten-free and got tested, you more than likely would test "true" negative or just negative. This means that the gluten-free diet is working and no anti-bodies should be present. I know it sounds confusing and if you don't agree feel free to respond. 
    • SilkieFairy
      I realized it is actually important to get an official diagnosis because then insurance can cover bone density testing and other lab work to see if any further damage has been done because of it. Also, if hospitalized for whatever reason, I have the right to gluten-free food if I am officially celiac. I guess it gives me some legal protections. Plus, I have 4 kids, and I really want to know. If I really do have it then they may have increased risk. 
    • par18
      Been off this forum for years. Is it that important that you get an official diagnosis of something? It appears like you had a trigger (wheat, gluten, whatever) and removing it has resolved your symptom. I can't speak for you, but I had known what my trigger was (gluten) years before my diagnosis I would just stay gluten-free and get on with my symptom free condition. I was diagnosed over 20 years ago and have been symptom free only excluding wheat, rye and barley. I tolerate all naturally gluten free whole foods including things like beans which actually helps to form the stools. 
    • trents
      No coincidence. Recent revisions to gluten challenge guidelines call for the daily consumption of at least 10g of gluten (about the amount in 4-6 slices of wheat bread) for a minimum of 3 weeks. If possible, I would extend that two weeks to ensure valid testing.
    • SilkieFairy
      Thank you both for the replies. I decided to bring back gluten so I can do the blood test. Today is Day #2 of the Challenge. Yesterday I had about 3 slices of whole wheat bread and I woke up with urgent diarrhea this morning. It was orange, sandy and had the distinctive smell that I did not have when I was briefly gluten free. I don't know if it's a coincidence, but the brain fog is back and I feel very tired.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.