Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Tissue Transglutaminase (ttg)


Emme999

Recommended Posts

Emme999 Enthusiast

Well, my dad was finally tested for celiac disease - which I *really* thought he had, because of his many problems that seem to correlate. But - his tTG score was only 3. So.. this led me to wonder what mine was!

My score was 23.4 - does anyone know about the "normal" range? My dad's doctor said normal range was anything below 19, but then my doctor told me that normal range was anything below 7. All I know for sure is that mine seems high.

If you know your score, please share :) I'm interested!

And what does it mean if your score is "really" high versus "kinda" high anyway?

Please let me know if you know :)

Thanks!

- Michelle :wub:


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



KaitiUSA Enthusiast

Different labs vary with the ranges of normal.

My lab said anything below a 4 was normal...I had a 10

nikki-uk Enthusiast

My husband's ttg was 12 which was classed at borderline(biopsy positve though)

My son's recent results are7 which again are classed as borderline-but docs are now checking his ferratin levels looking for more signs.

The number scored therefore can vary enormously.Would your Dad consider doing a trial gluten-free period to see if he has a positive response?

Carriefaith Enthusiast

Mine was high, like 20 or 30 something, I don't really remember the exact number though. I believe the normal in my lab was 7.

SueC Explorer

MIne was 187!! The normal range for my lab is 0-19.

Does anyone else have a level that high?

Sue.

bklyn Enthusiast

Yup, mine was 194.

SueC Explorer

Hi Kathy,

Did your levels go down? If so how long did it take?

Sue


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



lovegrov Collaborator

Mine was 177 with anything above 19 positive. It was normal 14 months later but probably was actually down before that.

richard

bklyn Enthusiast

I was at 5 after about six months.

skbird Contributor

Michelle - was that the only test your dad had, or did he have others?

Stephanie

Sharon C. Explorer

Hi-

My son is going back for a follow up after being diagnosed last October with Celiac. They are testing him with this same test. They are not doing a Gliadin/IgG-IgA. Just a tTG, and also thyroid function and also CBC/platlet. Is this a normal way to check to see if levels have gone down?

Also, when my son was diagnosed, I asked my doctor to screen me. He had NEVER screened anyone for gluten intolerance before. He sent me for the Gliadin IgG-IgA test but NOT the tTG. He said it "seemed" like I was negative. Is this the proper way to screen someone?

nikki-uk Enthusiast

Hi Sharon-the ttg is specific to coeliac disease,and you should have had it with the other tests.Without the ttg,your levels of iGg/igA would not really mean much(other than high levels would mean all is not well in your body).

However for your son,just testing his tTg levels is a normal way in diagnosed coeliac to see if his antibodies to gluten are going down now he's gluten-free.

Hope that helps.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - nanny marley replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      4

      nothing has changed

    2. - trents replied to Scott Adams's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      46

      Supplements for those Diagnosed with Celiac Disease

    3. - trents replied to Woodster991's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      10

      Is it gluten?

    4. - RMJ replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      4

      nothing has changed

    5. - asaT replied to wellthatsfun's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      4

      nothing has changed

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,342
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Muhammad
    Newest Member
    Muhammad
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • nanny marley
      I agree there I've tryed this myself to prove I can't eat gluten or lactose and it sets me back for about a month till I have to go back to being very strict to settle again 
    • trents
      You may also need to supplement with B12 as this vitamin is also involved in iron assimilation and is often deficient in long-term undiagnosed celiac disease.
    • trents
      @par18, no, Scott's use of the term "false negative" is intentional and appropriate. The "total IGA" test is not a test used to diagnose celiac disease per se. The IGA immune spectrum response encompasses more than just celiac disease. So, "total IGA" refers to the whole pie, not just the celiac response part of it. But if the whole pie is deficient, the spectrum of components making it up will likely be also, including the celiac disease response spectrum. In other words, IGA deficiency may produce a tTG-IGA score that is negative that might have been positive had there not been IGA deficiency. So, the tTG-IGA negative score may be "false", i.e, inaccurate, aka, not to be trusted.
    • RMJ
      This may be the problem. Every time you eat gluten it is like giving a booster shot to your immune system, telling it to react and produce antibodies again.
    • asaT
      Scott, I am mostly asymptomatic. I was diagnosed based on high antibodies, low ferritin (3) and low vitamin D (10). I wasn't able to get in for the biopsy until 3 months after the blood test came back. I was supposed to keep eating gluten during this time. Well why would I continue doing something that I know to be harmful for 3 more months to just get this test? So I did quit gluten and had the biopsy. It was negative for celiacs. I continued gluten free with iron supps and my ferritin came back up to a reasonable, but not great level of around 30-35.  Could there be something else going on? Is there any reason why my antibodies would be high (>80) with a negative biopsy? could me intestines have healed that quickly (3 months)?  I'm having a hard time staying gluten free because I am asymptomatic and i'm wondering about that biopsy. I do have the celiacs gene, and all of the antibody tests have always come back high. I recently had them tested again. Still very high. I am gluten free mostly, but not totally. I will occasionally eat something with gluten, but try to keep to a minimum. It's really hard when the immediate consequences are nil.  with high antibodies, the gene, but a negative biopsy (after 3 months strict gluten-free), do i really have celiacs? please say no. lol. i think i know the answer.  Asa
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.