Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Blood Test Confusion! Please Help1

orangez28cam

Recommended Posts

orangez28cam Rookie
orangez28cam
Posted

I'm new to the board, just got my blood test results back yesterday. My family doctor isn't familiar with Celiac disease, looked at my blood tests and said she was suspicious foe Celiac Disease, and referred me to a gastrointestinal specialist. I can't get in to see the specialist until the 1st of December and it's driving me crazy not knowing what these blood test results mean. Here are my results:

Deamidated Gliadin ABS, IGA: 55 (moderate to strong positive >30)

Deamidated Gliadin ABS, IGG: 8 (negative 0-19)

T-Transglutaminase (TTG) IGA: <2 (negative 0-3)

T-Transglutaminase (TTG) IGG: 6 (weak positive 6-9)

Endomysial antibody IGA is negative

Immunoglobulin A. QN. Serum is 174 (70-400 range)

I have lots of symptoms of celiac disease, been diagnosed with IBS in the past, but requested celiac testing based on all of my symptoms. I have searched the internet, and sort of understand the testing for the most part. It appears I am positive for Gliadin IGA and TTG IGG. I can't seem to find much info on TTG IGG. There is a lot of info on TTG IGA, but not the other. Can someone please help me make some sense of this? I'm so confused!!! Thank you!

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


SGWhiskers Collaborator
SGWhiskers
Posted

It is not uncommon for a person with celiac to have some positives and some negatives. That is part of the reason for running so many different tests in the panel. If you are positive on one, you have celiac. It looks like you get to join the club and get rid of the IBS symptoms. Congrats. Good for your doc for at least getting you tested. At least he admits he does not know how to read the test results.

You've got several options from here.

1) Stay on a hefty dose of gluten from now until you get an endoscopy with a GI doc. It is possible that the endoscopy biopsy will miss the sites of damage and you could wind up with a negative from that test dispite a positive diagnosis from blood tests.

2) Go gluten free and get rid of the IBS symptoms as soon as possible. You can always head to the GI doc and say "I tried strict gluten free and it is working." Of course with this approach, if you decide you want the biopsy, you will need to start eating gluten again for 2 months and will probably hate every minute of it. (The biopsy and blood work will give false negatives if you are gluten free).

3) You can mess around with a little gluten free and a little gluten food and screw up the biopsy and feel crummy the whole time and get the impression gluten free food does nothing for you even though you never were truly gluten free. It takes 3 months or so to get good at it.

I chose to stay on gluten until my biopsy because I didn't give enough weight to the value of a positive celiac blood panel. A positive on the blood test and on biopsy made me feel confident in my diagnosis in the beginning. When I see a doctor and tell them I have celiac disease, they seem to give me some level of credibility with the blood/biopsy statement that I'm not just a fad dieter. In retrospect, however, I didn't need the biopsy and put myself through 2 months of extra gluten and neuro damage because I was a newbie. I should have gone gluten free and never looked back.

Keep asking questions and searching the website. People here have a ton of knowledge and experience.

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

Welcome to the board.

Deamidated Gliadin ABS, IGA: 55 (moderate to strong positive >30)

This is a very good test for celiac. There are folks around here who had negatives on the other tests, but this test identified their celiac disease. The TTG IgG is also suggestive, but not as much so since you have normal amounts of IgA. Your GI will probably want to do a biopsy, so you might give his office a call and find out if you need to continue eating gluten to get accurate results or whether they want you to start the gluten-free diet right away.

By the way, even if you do not show damage on biopsy you should try the diet once the testing is done. It is very likely to help your IBS and other symptoms.

orangez28cam Rookie
orangez28cam
Posted
  • Author

Thank you both so much! All of this is so new to me and it's all so confusing at first! I think I will stick with eating gluten for now, and see the GI doc about a biopsy. It's funny how now that I know what might be causing my symptoms, those doughnuts, cereals, breads, just don't look quite as delicisous. ;)

nora-n Rookie
nora-n
Posted

Yes, this new test (deamidated gliadin) is supposed to be a very good test for celiac, and many labs have started using this one as the preferred test for celiac now.

Interesting that the other tests were negative/weakly positive. It shows that they cannot rule out ceiac with just a negative test, and that just running the old ttg test is not good enough.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,685
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    tdouglas2901
    Newest Member
    tdouglas2901
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      Draft gluten-free ciders… can they be trusted ?

      By Rejoicephd · Posted

      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Inkie · Posted

      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      Tea Bags and Gluten

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      Inconclusive results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.