Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Homeowners Association


SGWhiskers

Recommended Posts

SGWhiskers Collaborator

Our subdivision is trying to restore a prairie area. As of tonight, I am on a committee to help with the decision making process for how to restore the area in an ecologically sound way. The area is a common trail area about 3 acres away from my house. One proposal I heard someone suggest was to put rye down. We tabled the discussion until another meeting. From past experience, I've learned that there are two categories of plants that can be called rye. The Rye that is a cover crop/grain is what causes celiac problems. The rye that is mixed in with turf grass is in a different botanical group and isn't made into food and does not cause problems.

So the question is: If they are talking about using the cover crop rye that causes celiac problems, am I within my rights as a homeowner to request that they refrain, or is that pushing my own personal agenda? I know, if I don't eat it, I'm fine. I would just rather not be walking through a trail of poison or avoiding the area we are restoring. The rye would be grown for 1-3 years as we restore. Hubby thinks that me asking for no rye planting is like a nasal allergy sufferer asking for grass instead of wildflowers.

My concerns are that

a)I don't want to take advantage of my position on the committee to push my own adgenda.

b)I don't want to be a whimp if it is fair to ask them to look at other, and probably more expensive options.

c) I know this rye plan is ecologically sound, at least on the surface, and that the likely alternative is repeated application of herbicides which I detest.

If it helps, I am a 1/25th owner of the commons area in question.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Jestgar Rising Star

They would never plant a crop, since that wouldn't be restoring anything to a native state. Consider it your job to make sure they choose the right grasses. :)

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

kareng Grand Master

I don't know where you live. Here in the midwest there are places you can get info to restore native prairie grasses - tall grass or short. Rye grass or the crop wouldn't be natural. It sounds like they are just planting the rye grass next to the trail so you have something that can me kept mowed down and free of poison ivy. That is just regular grass. I don't know if that is the right choice for that application. If they just want something green until the native stuff grows in, yard grass might not be a good choice. It will take the native plants' water, cover the seeds from the sun even in the winter and other things.

Takala Enthusiast

I do hiking. If I had the choice of walking along a path framed by planted turf grass including rye, or natural vegetation to my area, I'd pick the turf grass EVERY time.

You should see the "natural" vegetation we get in some parts of Northern CA along the American River trails- poison oak, thorny wild raspberries, and the introduced star thistle, plus foxtails and other weed seedheads that can work their way into your dog's paws and ears, besides your socks. If my spouse has the dog's leash, I have to constantly remind him to KEEP THE DOG OUT ON THE PATH OUT OF THE GRASS. At our place we also have an area that gets stinging nettle every spring that has to be cut down. There is also this really sappy, sticky, smelly stuff in the fall which blooms on unirrigated pasture, which I am not sure of what the botanical name is, but it not only makes me welt up, some of the horses are allergic to it.

As long as you aren't grazing on the seedheads you won't be affected.

kareng Grand Master

I do hiking. If I had the choice of walking along a path framed by planted turf grass including rye, or natural vegetation to my area, I'd pick the turf grass EVERY time.

You should see the "natural" vegetation we get in some parts of Northern CA along the American River trails- poison oak, thorny wild raspberries, and the introduced star thistle, plus foxtails and other weed seedheads that can work their way into your dog's paws and ears, besides your socks. If my spouse has the dog's leash, I have to constantly remind him to KEEP THE DOG OUT ON THE PATH OUT OF THE GRASS. At our place we also have an area that gets stinging nettle every spring that has to be cut down. There is also this really sappy, sticky, smelly stuff in the fall which blooms on unirrigated pasture, which I am not sure of what the botanical name is, but it not only makes me welt up, some of the horses are allergic to it.

As long as you aren't grazing on the seedheads you won't be affected.

Years ago, I lived on the American River. I swear the foxtails are alien creatures not seeds! They wiggle their way into everything.

We have a Nature Ct for grade school kids. We have some paved paths ( wheelchairs). And some mulched. We just have regular grass about 1 foot on each side of the paths in the Tall Grass Prairie area. Partially to protect the plants from kids swing clipboards and pushing each other! :)

SGWhiskers Collaborator

Back to the main question about whether it is fair of me to request that Rye not be planted due to my "allergies." What do you guys think?

Thank you for the information about the prairie grasses. That along with native wildflowers is the long range plan, however the soil was aggressively disturbed due to two reckless homeowners. Now we are left with a big restoration project starting at the wrong time of the year. Rye (the covercrop) helps to keep us from having to spray the area again with herbicide while we wait for the right time to plant the native grasses and wildflowers. If they are talking perenial rye turf grass, that I'll fight for other reasons. We don't live in a traditional subdivision and it would be inconsistent with the nature preserve setting. I'm fairly well educated about natives and the basics of a restoration project. I'm working with 3 other homeowners and at least 2 professionals to create a long term plan which will make sure the right type of plants regrow in this area instead of thistles, buckthorn, and ragweed.

So, are my "allergies" reason to insist on another cover crop (if needed), or is that pushing my problems on others?

Thank you

Jestgar Rising Star

I don't think your allergies are relevant. If they want to restore the area they shouldn't plant anything that isn't native for any reason. Find some other, native, protective plant to put it while you wait for the perfect time.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kareng Grand Master

I don't think your allergies are relevant. If they want to restore the area they shouldn't plant anything that isn't native for any reason. Find some other, native, protective plant to put it while you wait for the perfect time.

I agree with Jess. I thought that was what I was saying. They shouldn't plant the crop Rye, how would that make sense? I thought maybe you were planting the rye grass you use in yards just to fill in until the other stuff grows in the spring. That is not the same as rye that people eat.

If you are worried about allergies, you should pave it over because someone will have a problem with the pollen from the native plants and flowers. At least with our "allergy" we have to eat it, a little pollen in the air isn't the part we react to.

SGWhiskers Collaborator

OK, that makes sense. Thanks for all you advice.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - jenniber replied to jenniber's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      9

      Disaccharide deficient, confusing biopsy results, no blood test

    2. - trents replied to SamAlvi's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      High TTG-IgG and Normal TTG-IgA

    3. - xxnonamexx replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      32

      My journey is it gluten or fiber?

    4. - xxnonamexx replied to xxnonamexx's topic in Post Diagnosis, Recovery & Treatment of Celiac Disease
      32

      My journey is it gluten or fiber?

    5. - SamAlvi replied to SamAlvi's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      High TTG-IgG and Normal TTG-IgA

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,845
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Paulaannefthimiou
    Newest Member
    Paulaannefthimiou
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • jenniber
      thank you both for the insights. i agree, im going to back off on dairy and try sucraid. thanks for the tip about protein powder, i will look for whey protein powder/drinks!   i don’t understand why my doctor refused to order it either. so i’ve decided i’m not going to her again, and i’m going to get a second opinion with a GI recommended to me by someone with celiac. unfortunately my first appointment isn’t until February 17th. do you think i should go gluten free now or wait until after i meet with the new doctor? i’m torn about what i should do, i dont know if she is going to want to repeat the endoscopy, and i know ill have to be eating gluten to have a positive biopsy. i could always do the gluten challenge on the other hand if she does want to repeat the biopsy.    thanks again, i appreciate the support here. i’ve learned a lot from these boards. i dont know anyone in real life with celiac.
    • trents
      Let me suggest an adjustment to your terminology. "Celiac disease" and "gluten intolerance" are the same. The other gluten disorder you refer to is NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) which is often referred to as being "gluten sensitive". Having said that, the reality is there is still much inconsistency in how people use these terms. Since celiac disease does damage to the small bowel lining it often results in nutritional deficiencies such as anemia. NCGS does not damage the small bowel lining so your history of anemia may suggest you have celiac disease as opposed to NCGS. But either way, a gluten-free diet is in order. NCGS can cause bodily damage in other ways, particularly to neurological systems.
    • xxnonamexx
      I made it through the holiday w/o being glutened. I had my brother cook with gluten-free breadcrumbs and I didn't get sick. I baked cookies with gluten-free flour and had dry ingredients for cookies in ziplock bag. I also made gluten cookies as well and guess I did good washing to avoid CC. My wife also went to a french bakery and bought a gluten-free flourless chocolate cake dedicated gluten-free it was out of this world. 
    • xxnonamexx
      What do you mean it would not allow any celiac to eat gluten again. I think if this helps cross contamination when eating out at a non dedicated gluten-free restaurant this would be nice not to encounter the pains. But is their a daily enzyme to take to help strengthen the digestive system? 
    • SamAlvi
      Hi, thank you for the reply. Unfortunately, no other antibody tests were ordered. I am a 32-year-old male. About two months ago, I ate pancakes and then developed severe diarrhea that lasted the entire day. At night, I became unconscious due to fluid loss and was admitted to the ER, where I received IV fluids. Two days later, I ate bread again and once more developed severe diarrhea. I ended up in the ER again and received IV fluids. In my country, Pakistan, doctors are unfortunately not very thorough, so they treated me for a stomach infection. I visited three or four doctors, including a gastroenterologist, but it seemed like they just wanted to keep me on medications and IV fluids. Eventually, I did some digging myself and started connecting the dots. For years, I’ve had excessive gas buildup and frequent loose stools, but I never paid much attention to it. I also cannot easily digest dairy products. Two years ago, I had a CBC test that showed iron deficiency. My doctor told me to eat more meat and said it was nothing serious. However, for the past five years, I’ve also had severe motion sickness, which I never experienced before. Whenever I get on a bus or in a car, I sometimes lose consciousness for 10–20 seconds and wake up sweaty, and occasionally I feel the need to vomit. After more research on the internet, I came across gluten and celiac disease, so I got two related tests (TTG-IgA & TTG IgG) done along with a stool test and another CBC. The stool test showed weakly positive blood. Ever since eating those pancakes and bread, I’ve had a burning sensation in my gut. My doctor reviewed my tests, he told me to completely stop eating gluten and started me on IV fluids for 20 days, saying that I had severe inflammation in my gut. It has now been two months since I quit gluten, and I’m still not sure whether this is celiac disease or gluten intolerance. I don’t really trust doctors in Pakistan, so I thought I might get some help here.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.