Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Biopsy Results And Still Confused.


brendab

Recommended Posts

brendab Contributor

So, my 2 year old son had his biopsy in November and the Dr saw no damage but she said that there still could be some that cannot be seen with the naked eye. She said there was damage to the intestines but from food allergies. Tell me, what would the difference be in damage? I didn't think about it until this morning so I didn't ask her.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Kimbalou Enthusiast

I don't understand her comment that there could still be some damage that cannot be seen with the naked eye. The reason for a biopsy is to look at the specimen under a microscope, because a Dr. can't tell for sure what's going on with the naked eye!

Am I making sense? Celiac causes the villi to be almost non-existent in some cases...I'm not sure what food allergies would do to the intestines. That's what you need to ask her: what do the villi look like and what is the difference in the way an intestine looks like with damage from celiac vs. allergies.

Hope that helps.

brendab Contributor

I don't understand her comment that there could still be some damage that cannot be seen with the naked eye. The reason for a biopsy is to look at the specimen under a microscope, because a Dr. can't tell for sure what's going on with the naked eye!

Am I making sense? Celiac causes the villi to be almost non-existent in some cases...I'm not sure what food allergies would do to the intestines. That's what you need to ask her: what do the villi look like and what is the difference in the way an intestine looks like with damage from celiac vs. allergies.

Hope that helps.

Well, I think she was referring to any ulcers or polyps, etc. So it occured to me today, when talking to a friend about this, that I am now wondering what the visual difference would be so I thought I'd ask the experts here :) She's hard to get ahold of, I'm hoping there is a vast difference because if it's just damage to her through the microscope and maybe it's the beginnings of damage as in celiac damage and she's mistaking it for food allergy damage (whatever that entails) I hope she'd know and can explain to me. I'm rambling I am sure, thank you for the reply.

mushroom Proficient

Food allergies don't cause ulcers or polyps! That doesn't make sense. If you google under intestinal damage and causes, all you get pretty much is celiac, Chrohn's, ulcerative collitis, perhaps gastroparesis. It is possible that what was seen on biopsy was some inflammation which is often the first sign of early celiac. I think you should get a copy of the repirt and see what it says for yourself.

GlutenFreeManna Rising Star

Her statement is confusing. Are you sure she took biopsies? How many did she take? Is it possible she just did a scope and didn't actaully take any samples? It's my understanding from reading on here (someone correct me if I'm wrong) that they can't see villi damage when they do an endoscopy (during the procedure), that's why they can miss biopsying the damaged regions of the intestines if the damage is patchy. People do have just scopes however to look for polyps and ulcers. I think you may need to find a new doctor if she didn't do a biopsy to look for villi damage.

Lisa Mentor

Open Original Shared Link

Although villous atrophy is not exclusive of celiac disease, it is considered a crucial finding. Other causes of blunted villi include tropical sprue, malnutrition, intolerance to cow's milk, soy protein intolerance, and infectious gastroenteritis. However, most of these conditions can be readily excluded on the basis of clinical history and laboratory data.

brendab Contributor

Food allergies don't cause ulcers or polyps! That doesn't make sense. If you google under intestinal damage and causes, all you get pretty much is celiac, Chrohn's, ulcerative collitis, perhaps gastroparesis. It is possible that what was seen on biopsy was some inflammation which is often the first sign of early celiac. I think you should get a copy of the repirt and see what it says for yourself.

She was investigating why my son would be bleeding intestinally and said that polyps could cause bleeding, she was also looking for any ulcers so initially she didn't see anything but when she did the biopsy and really looked closely she saw damage that she said was from food allergies. It got me to thinking about how she would know the difference between gluten damage and say, dairy damage?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



brendab Contributor

Open Original Shared Link

Although villous atrophy is not exclusive of celiac disease, it is considered a crucial finding. Other causes of blunted villi include tropical sprue, malnutrition, intolerance to cow's milk, soy protein intolerance, and infectious gastroenteritis. However, most of these conditions can be readily excluded on the basis of clinical history and laboratory data.

Your link doesn't work, what is it? He's allergic to dairy and wheat; they affect his intestines.

Lisa Mentor

Your link doesn't work, what is it? He's allergic to dairy and wheat; they affect his intestines.

The link needs to be subscribed too. I copied and pasted the information for you.

Do you or his father have digestive issues, or a history of intestinal distress (IBS)?

brendab Contributor

The link needs to be subscribed too. I copied and pasted the information for you.

Do you or his father have digestive issues, or a history of intestinal distress (IBS)?

Oh I see now, thank you for that.

Yes, I was diagnosed with IBS that is "cured" by going gluten-free. I tested neg through the blood test for celiac and quit there. I stay gluten free because it helps me in a number of ways, not just in the bowels.

Lisa Mentor

Oh I see now, thank you for that.

Yes, I was diagnosed with IBS that is "cured" by going gluten-free. I tested neg through the blood test for celiac and quit there. I stay gluten free because it helps me in a number of ways, not just in the bowels.

I have always heard that testing children under the age of five is unreliable. And the tendency can be genetic.

Perhaps you can put your son on a gluten free/dairy free diet for a period of several months. Positive dietary response can be diagnosis as well.

rosetapper23 Explorer

I would venture to guess that your child's doctor is not knowledgeable enough to determine whether or not your son's biopsy shows signs of villi destruction or not. Even trained pathologists can find reading biopsies difficult. Also, sometimes the scope can't reach the area that is damaged in the small intestine. Would your doctor be willing to send the biopsy to a trained pathologist or gastroenterologist for a second opinion? Since you have gluten sensitivity, it would seem logical for the doctor to suggest a gluten-free diet for your son to see if the symptoms resolve themselves. If you don't get direct, logical answers from her, perhaps you need to seek another medical opinion elsewhere.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,198
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Joanne01
    Newest Member
    Joanne01
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
    • trents
      @JettaGirl, "Coeliac" is the British spelling of "celiac". Same disease. 
    • JettaGirl
      This may sound ridiculous but is this supposed to say Celiacs? I looked up Coeliacs because you never know, there’s a lot of diseases related to a disease that they come up with similar names for. It’s probably meant to say Celiacs but I just wanted to confirm.
    • JoJo0611
      I was told it was to see how much damage has been caused. But just told CT with contrast not any other name for it. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.