Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Need Help! ... It Seems Like Its Me Vs. My Doctor


celiaco

Recommended Posts

celiaco Newbie

Before I realized that I was Gluten Intolerant 18 months ago, I had spent a fortune on Doctors as I thought that I was literally dying. My stomach was bloated all the time, my energy level was very bad, my joints hurt, my eyes were foggy, my eyes would water all the time, I even smelled different. When I stopped eating gluten 18 months ago it took 1 week for me to start feeling some relief, after 3 weeks I was feeling like "a kid" and it remained that way until 7 weeks ago. But it is important to tell you that I never had any blood test done in order to oficially state that I was gluten intolerant.

Two out of my three kids, age 6 and 4, were having some growth issues, they were not growing at the pace of the average children even though my wife and I are average size. They were diagnosed with Renal Tubular Acidosis, which is a disease that occurs when the kidneys fail to excrete acids into the urine, abnormal growth is one of their symptoms. As I am convinced that I am gluten intolerant and knowing that it might be hereditary and that one of the symptoms on children is problems with growth I told the doctor that they should be tested. He first asked me to test my self in order to have a resonable reason to test the children. After been in a gluten-free diet for 18 months he said to eat gluten 15 days before testing my blood, but after verifying it with celiac.com


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



rosetapper23 Explorer

Is there a way that you can change doctors? You should NOT have to go through a worthless endoscopy to prove that you can't tolerate gluten. It's a shame that you've had to harm your health by adding gluten back into your diet. The fact that your children have growth issues is reason enough (in my book) to do further testing. Shame on their doctor!! Please, if possible, change doctors ASAP.

mushroom Proficient

How were your children diagnosed, and what treatment is your doctor providing for this condition?

Marlie Apprentice

How were your children diagnosed, and what treatment is your doctor providing for this condition?

First of all children can have Celiac Disease and not have parents who are. So whether or not you have Celiac disease is immaterial. From what I've read there are false negatives both on the labs and even the biopsys. My child who was just diagnosed only tested positive on the DgP test. Had my child turned up negative on the biopsy I was going to do a trial Gluten Free Diet as I had nothing to lose. In the end she was diagnosed and she is feeling better after 6 days gluten free. Individuals also can get sick from Gluten yet not have Celiac Disease. Best wishes.

ravenwoodglass Mentor

I am so sorry you are going through this. I don't know why doctors feel we have to prove the diet is helping by making us as sick or sicker than we were when we started it. False negatives on testing are not uncommon even having never been gluten free and even close to death. (Raising both arms and waving strongly here :lol:) My doctors refused to even consider doing an endo since I show up false negative in blood work.

You do have the option of simply putting them on the diet. You don't need the doctors permission. If it helps their growth, and if they need to be on the diet you may see a surprising result in their charts on the next visit, when the doctor says 'well I guess they just needed to 'catch up' you can reply "No they have been on the gluten free diet for x months". I would give anything to have known about the diet and been able to put my son on it with or without a doctors 'permission'.

domesticactivist Collaborator

Is there any way you can see another dr who is known to pay more attention to your actual experience than just labs? Could you get the testing done for your kids anyway?

Another thought is maybe it'll make sense to just do the diet without tests. My sense is that regardless what the labs say you'd want to try it with your kids.

beefree11 Newbie

Before I realized that I was Gluten Intolerant 18 months ago, I had spent a fortune on Doctors as I thought that I was literally dying. My stomach was bloated all the time, my energy level was very bad, my joints hurt, my eyes were foggy, my eyes would water all the time, I even smelled different. When I stopped eating gluten 18 months ago it took 1 week for me to start feeling some relief, after 3 weeks I was feeling like "a kid" and it remained that way until 7 weeks ago. But it is important to tell you that I never had any blood test done in order to oficially state that I was gluten intolerant.

I will tell the doctor to make an endoscopy and duodenal biopsy to continue trying to prove that I am gluten intolerant in order to have reasonable doubt about my kids having the same thing in order to help them with their growth issues.

I have read it posted - here, in fact - that the biopsy isn't 100%. You could still have gluten issues with a negative biopsy. Please read the information from this site: https://www.celiac.com/articles/978/1/So-Why-Do-Celiacs-Still-Need-Biopsy-By-William-Dickey-PhD-MD-FACG/Page1.html I hope it helps.

Would you mind so much the endoscopy if perhaps something else could be the cause of your issues? I am very sympathetic. I was found to have a small duodenal ulcer and told to eat fatty. YES a doctor advised me to drink whole milk products to coat the stomach. I was on the floor in pain...come to find out I had gallstones and the fat was killing me! Even after that, my issues became worse. Diarrhea was daily. The endo and colo scopes found some inflammation. Some healing of reflux and a few others, but no villous blunting, I believe was medical jargon was in my report--no blunting.

I am on enzymes, probiotics, organic food and learning to remain calm! Well, at least trying to. But perhaps the scope might be the test you need to find what is going on. If there is inflammation, there may be a problem that your doctor cannot ignore and you may continue the gluten free diet. He can't stop you. Good luck and I hope it all turns out well for you.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



kayo Explorer

Is there a reason you wouldn't just put your children on a gluten free diet? Forget the tests and the docs and just go ahead with the diet changes and see if they improve?

My test results are inconclusive because I was gluten-free at the time of testing but doc feels I have celiac as I have all the symptoms. Those symptoms go away when I'm gluten-free. That's all the proof I need. My sister does have celiac and her blood work came back negative and her endoscopy came back positive.

eatmeat4good Enthusiast

Gluten Intolerance is not something that shows up on tests, yet it can be every bit as debilitating as Celiac in terms of health symptoms and poor quality of life.

Just go gluten free and take your children with you.

Leave your Dr. in his office.

He isn't helping.

Find another Dr. and have the vitamin levels of the children checked and yours too.

Then see how it goes on the gluten free diet.

Just a thought

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Scott Adams replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It

    2. - Scott Adams replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    3. - deanna1ynne replied to deanna1ynne's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      13

      Inconclusive results

    4. - cristiana replied to HAUS's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      7

      Sainsbury's Free From White Sliced Bread - Now Egg Free - Completely Ruined It


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,437
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    rednecksurfer
    Newest Member
    rednecksurfer
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      In the U.S., most regular wheat breads are required to be enriched with certain B-vitamins and iron, but gluten-free breads are not required to be. Since many gluten-free products are not enriched, we usually encourage people with celiac disease to consider a multivitamin.  In the early 1900s, refined white flour replaced whole grains, and people began developing serious vitamin-deficiency diseases: Beriberi → caused by a lack of thiamin (vitamin B1) Pellagra → caused by a lack of niacin (vitamin B3) Anemia → linked to low iron and lack of folate By the 1930s–40s, these problems were common in the U.S., especially in poorer regions. Public-health officials responded by requiring wheat flour and the breads made from it to be “enriched” with thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, and iron. Folic acid was added later (1998) to prevent neural-tube birth defects. Why gluten-free bread isn’t required to be enriched? The U.S. enrichment standards were written specifically for wheat flour. Gluten-free breads use rice, tapioca, corn, sorghum, etc.—so they fall outside that rule—but they probably should be for the same reason wheat products are.
    • Scott Adams
      Keep in mind that there are drawbacks to a formal diagnosis, for example more expensive life and private health insurance, as well as possibly needing to disclose it on job applications. Normally I am in favor of the formal diagnosis process, but if you've already figured out that you can't tolerate gluten and will likely stay gluten-free anyway, I wanted to at least mention the possible negative sides of having a formal diagnosis. While I understand wanting a formal diagnosis, it sounds like she will likely remain gluten-free either way, even if she should test negative for celiac disease (Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If her symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet, it would likely signal NCGS).        
    • JoJo0611
    • deanna1ynne
      Thank you all so much for your advice and thoughts. We ended up having another scope and more bloodwork last week. All serological markers continue to increase, and the doc who did the scope said there villous atrophy visible on the scope — but we just got the biopsy pathology report back, and all it says is, “Duodenal mucosa with patchy increased intraepithelial lymphocytes, preserved villous architecture, and patchy foveolar metaplasia,” which we are told is still inconclusive…  We will have her go gluten free again anyway, but how soon would you all test again, if at all? How valuable is an official dx in a situation like this?
    • cristiana
      Thanks for this Russ, and good to see that it is fortified. I spend too much time looking for M&S gluten-free Iced Spiced Buns to have ever noticed this! That's interesting, Scott.  Have manufacturers ever said why that should be the case?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.