Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Test Results Question


Caeryn23

Recommended Posts

Caeryn23 Rookie

I have been gluten free for about 2 years. My PCP ordered the Celiac panel. The EMA was ordered, but for some reason it was not ran. I ate gluten for 1 week before the tests. I did not make a follow up appointment yet. Here are the results:

Anti-Gliadin Antibodies

IgG 3 and IgA 1

ranges: 0-19 negative, 20-30 weak positive, >30 moderate to strong positive

Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody IgA <2

ranges: 1-3 negative, 4-10 weak positive, >10 positive

Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody IgG <2

ranges: 0-5 negative, 6-9 weak positive, >9 positive

Total IgA 129 range: 70-400

My old GI ordered the gene tests. I have HLA DQ2, DQ8, DR4, and DR7.

Does the gliadin results mean I'm producing antibodies? What would that indicate?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



adab8ca Enthusiast

I have been gluten free for about 2 years. My PCP ordered the Celiac panel. The EMA was ordered, but for some reason it was not ran. I ate gluten for 1 week before the tests. I did not make a follow up appointment yet. Here are the results:

Anti-Gliadin Antibodies

IgG 3 and IgA 1

ranges: 0-19 negative, 20-30 weak positive, >30 moderate to strong positive

Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody IgA <2

ranges: 1-3 negative, 4-10 weak positive, >10 positive

Tissue Transglutaminase Antibody IgG <2

ranges: 0-5 negative, 6-9 weak positive, >9 positive

Total IgA 129 range: 70-400

My old GI ordered the gene tests. I have HLA DQ2, DQ8, DR4, and DR7.

Does the gliadin results mean I'm producing antibodies? What would that indicate?

Hi

The gliadin result still falls in the negative range. However, being gluten-free for 2 years and eating gluten for one week, I am not surprised that everything is negative. This is totally inconclusive. I was off gluten for a month and my GI said that I needed to be eating LOTS for atleast 6 weeks before my endoscopy.

How do you feel off gluten and on gluten? That may be your best indicator.

May I ask why you decided to get tested after two years gluten-free?

Caeryn23 Rookie

I was having symptoms and went to the GI clinic. I stopped eating most gluten foods because they made me sick. They kept saying I had IBS and never mentioned gluten/celiac or anything else. I asked them to test me; they only did the Total IgA and Tissue Transglutaminase IgG. The tests were after I went "gluten light." They never said how much gluten I had to eat before any testing.

I feel better being off gluten. I decided to get tested again because I have a new PCP. I wanted to know what the results would be.

Skylark Collaborator

You need to eat a full gluten diet for 2-3 months to get a positive result on the tests. It's not surprising at all that this panel was negative. Your Dr. should have known this and told you. :(

Caeryn23 Rookie

The GI said I was eating enough, even I was "gluten light." I can post the biopsy results that he ordered. My PCP said it may not make a difference how much gluten I was eating. However, my PCP said to avoid gluten if it was making me sick.

Would antihistamines, antacids, other medicines, or a blood transfusion have an effect on the Celiac Panel?

psawyer Proficient

Would antihistamines, antacids, other medicines, or a blood transfusion have an effect on the Celiac Panel?

No, no, no and maybe. I suppose that if the blood donor had active celiac disease some antibodies might transfer. Not sure on that.

Caeryn23 Rookie

Thank you for responding.

I had surgery in Summer 2009, where I had a transfusion. I wasn't sure if that would have an effect on the blood tests.

Here are my biopsy results from 2008. I was "gluten light." About 5 samples were taken.

* Preserved villous architecture.

* No significant intraepithelial lymphocytosis, active inflammation, granulomas, adenomatous change (dysplasia), or maligancy.

* The histologic changes do not suggest celiac sprue.

They said there were some changes and little inflammation (normal range).


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Skylark Collaborator

Well, it's pretty clear that with "gluten light" you are not having antibodies or damage. It doesn't really matter if that diet made the tests negative because gluten makes you feel ill anyway. You're not looking to eat a lot of it, right? If I had your results I'd stick to a diet that made me feel well and not worry about celiac either way.

campfiregirl Newbie

I'm feeling frustrated and would just like a name for this. : ( My new GI Specialist thinks I have celiac, and finally my dr. is starting to believe me - I've tested negative a few times.. All those times I have not been eating gluten. Recently my gi specialist told me to go back to eating gluten with only a week before my endoscopy and colonscopy (aren't I lucky 2 4 1 deal!!)after being gluten free for 4 mths. My blood test will probably be negative as it was just over a week that I was back on. I had my endo/col yesterday and he said everything looked healthy & good & he took a few biopsies. I'm relieved it's not cancer and still would just like them to say yes it is celac!! I don't want to eat gluten another 4 months & then go back & get an endoscopy (he hasn't said that but did say I should be on longer before being tested). In the 10 days + being back on it my depression, exhaustion, constipation, stomach pains, irritability, extreme bloating (8-9 mths prego looking), clothes didn't fit, major gas, canker sores and a small blister like rash on my forearm & fingers. My mom tested negative for it but has severe reactions when eating it as well, she has osteo, and colitis. Her dr. doesn't believe her... I also have stomach pains and really bad headaches which thankfully, I'm being referred to a sinus specialist. I feel so much better, happier, energized, and lighter when being gluten free. I know I'm allergic to wheat but didn't have these kind of reactions until the last 3 years where my stomach has been distended, and the above symptoms. The GI surgeon I saw a year ago (1st endo) said I could have developed a gluten allergy? I'm so grateful nothing bad was detected and I'm also frustrated. If I had celiac wouldn't the specialist have seen that immediately on my endo or do they need to wait for biopsy results? I am still having really bad stomach pains. I was able to start having solids today and gratefully I'm going gluten free again and staying that way. Do I really need to stay on gluten longer to try and have yet, another blood test? Also, my ferritin is very low (been that way for last 3 yrs), my phosphorous? was low, too. My bones are really sore, and I found out I have arthritis in my neck and my bones in my back are really hurting. Oh yes, I had restless leg syndrome too!! All this just before my 45th!! lol Well, the next 45 yrs are going to be gluten free. Does anyone else have a similar experience? It was so frustrating to have my dr./surgeon keep telling me I needed anti-depressants. I took years ago and decided I would pull myself out but it has been a real struggle. It's not a struggle when I'm gluten free. Even the surgeon I saw 1 yr before my 1st endo - kind of looked at me and said IBS in a brief appt. stating he see's alot of middle aged women have this - asked if I had stress (which I do). The new specialist I saw seems to listen and is taking me serious - I know this isn't all in my head. Why heck to my bones hurt? My sisters and mom are all going gluten free because they have similiar experiences & notice a big difference in their kids, too when not on gluten. Thanks for listening!

Caeryn23 Rookie

Well, it's pretty clear that with "gluten light" you are not having antibodies or damage. It doesn't really matter if that diet made the tests negative because gluten makes you feel ill anyway. You're not looking to eat a lot of it, right? If I had your results I'd stick to a diet that made me feel well and not worry about celiac either way.

I meant I was "gluten light" for the biopsy. I was gluten free for 2 years (since November 2008) before the recent blood tests. However, I did eat gluten for 1 week before the blood tests. The Gliadin Antibody tests showed some antibodies, but were in normal range. I think my PCP just considers me Gluten Sensitive/Intolerant.

mushroom Proficient

Well, your tests really do not mean anything at all except that he didn't find anything else. So far as celiac is concerned they might as well not have been done. It takes 2-3 months on a full gluten diet to get meaningful test results - not to say they would be positive, but to determine whether or not you are celiac. Gluten free for two years for blood tests and 'gluten lite' for one week before biopsy... well, as far as celiac is concerned you might as well not have bothered and any GI who told you you were eating enough gluten ought to be ashamed of himself. I am sorry if you were led to believe that that would be adequate :( These doctors are so frustrating - it's almost like they just want to do the procedure, not find out what is wrong with you. :unsure:

Skylark Collaborator

I meant I was "gluten light" for the biopsy. I was gluten free for 2 years (since November 2008) before the recent blood tests. However, I did eat gluten for 1 week before the blood tests. The Gliadin Antibody tests showed some antibodies, but were in normal range. I think my PCP just considers me Gluten Sensitive/Intolerant.

OK. You had me a little confused. That means you have never had an accurate celiac test to know. You would have to eat full gluten (4 slices of bread a day) for 2-3 months to be sure of an accurate test. Folks around here used to say one month, but the studies I found were glutening people up for three months to get biopsies.

If you can't tolerate enough gluten to get accurate tests (I sure couldn't) it's best to stick to gluten-free and eat as if you're celiac.

Skylark Collaborator

I'm feeling frustrated and would just like a name for this. : (

I'm so sorry, but you can't have it both ways. People like you and me are in a frustrating position right now. Either you eat a LOT of gluten for a couple months to get tested, or you go without a "diagnosis". Like you, gluten poisons my mind as well as my GI. There is no way I could eat gluten for months to get an accurate test. I had the lab slip for anti-EMA in my bag, went to Jack in the Box and got a grilled ham & swiss sandwich on day 1 of eating gluten. I got a stomach-ache and tons of D, and woke up exhausted the next morning. That was the end of any interest I had testing.

Also like you I am quite sure I'm celiac. I've chosen to go strictly gluten-free and act as if I'm celiac. I catch a little grief from my mother who thinks I have a wheat allergy and don't have to be so careful, but whatever. I'm a grown adult and it's my choice what I put in my mouth. I feel great if I'm very strict on the diet, and get sick if I slip up.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - Mmoc replied to Mmoc's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      Blood tests low iGA 4 years later digestive issues

    2. - Aretaeus Cappadocia replied to Clear2me's topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      6

      Gluten free nuts

    3. - trents replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    4. - Scott Adams replied to Larzipan's topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      42

      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

    5. - Wheatwacked commented on Scott Adams's article in Latest Research
      6

      Study Estimates the Costs of Delayed Celiac Disease Diagnosis (+Video)


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,387
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    LizzieE
    Newest Member
    LizzieE
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Mmoc
      Thank you kindly for your response. I have since gotten the other type of bloods done and am awaiting results. 
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      I wanted to respond to your post as much for other people who read this later on (I'm not trying to contradict your experience or decisions) > Kirkland Signature Super Extra-Large Peanuts, 2.5 lbs, are labeled "gluten free" in the Calif Costcos I've been in. If they are selling non-gluten-free in your store, I suggest talking to customer service to see if they can get you the gluten-free version (they are tasty) > This past week I bought "Sliced Raw Almonds, Baking Nuts, 5 lbs Item 1495072 Best if used by Jun-10-26 W-261-6-L1A 12:47" at Costco. The package has the standard warning that it was made on machinery that <may> have processed wheat. Based on that alone, I would not eat these. However, I contacted customer service and asked them "are Costco's Sliced Almonds gluten free?" Within a day I got this response:  "This is [xyz] with the Costco Member Service Resolutions Team. I am happy to let you know we got a reply back from our Kirkland Signature team. Here is their response:  This item does not have a risk of cross contamination with gluten, barley or rye." Based on this, I will eat them. Based on experience, I believe they will be fine. Sometimes, for other products, the answer has been "they really do have cross-contamination risk" (eg, Kirkland Signature Dry Roasted Macadamia Nuts, Salted, 1.5 lbs Item 1195303). When they give me that answer I return them for cash. You might reasonably ask, "Why would Costco use that label if they actually are safe?" I can't speak for Costco but I've worked in Corporate America and I've seen this kind of thing first hand and up close. (1) This kind of regulatory label represents risk/cost to the company. What if they are mistaken? In one direction, the cost is loss of maybe 1% of sales (if celiacs don't buy when they would have). In the other direction, the risk is reputational damage and open-ended litigation (bad reviews and celiacs suing them). Expect them to play it safe. (2) There is a team tasked with getting each product out to market quickly and cheaply, and there is also a committee tasked with reviewing the packaging before it is released. If the team chooses the simplest, safest, pre-approved label, this becomes a quick check box. On the other hand, if they choose something else, it has to be carefully scrutinized through a long process. It's more efficient for the team to say there <could> be risk. (3) There is probably some plug and play in production. Some lots of the very same product could be made in a safe facility while others are made in an unsafe facility. Uniform packaging (saying there is risk) for all packages regardless of gluten risk is easier, cheaper, and safer (for Costco). Everything I wrote here is about my Costco experience, but the principles will be true at other vendors, particularly if they have extensive quality control infrastructure. The first hurdle of gluten-free diet is to remove/replace all the labeled gluten ingredients. The second, more difficult hurdle is to remove/replace all the hidden gluten. Each of us have to assess gray zones and make judgement calls knowing there is a penalty for being wrong. One penalty would be getting glutened but the other penalty could be eating an unnecessarily boring or malnourishing diet.
    • trents
      Thanks for the thoughtful reply and links, Wheatwacked. Definitely some food for thought. However, I would point out that your linked articles refer to gliadin in human breast milk, not cow's milk. And although it might seem reasonable to conclude it would work the same way in cows, that is not necessarily the case. Studies seem to indicate otherwise. Studies also indicate the amount of gliadin in human breast milk is miniscule and unlikely to cause reactions:  https://www.glutenfreewatchdog.org/news/gluten-peptides-in-human-breast-milk-implications-for-cows-milk/ I would also point out that Dr. Peter Osborne's doctorate is in chiropractic medicine, though he also has studied and, I believe, holds some sort of certifications in nutritional science. To put it plainly, he is considered by many qualified medical and nutritional professionals to be on the fringe of quackery. But he has a dedicated and rabid following, nonetheless.
    • Scott Adams
      I'd be very cautious about accepting these claims without robust evidence. The hypothesis requires a chain of biologically unlikely events: Gluten/gliadin survives the cow's rumen and entire digestive system intact. It is then absorbed whole into the cow's bloodstream. It bypasses the cow's immune system and liver. It is then secreted, still intact and immunogenic, into the milk. The cow's digestive system is designed to break down proteins, not transfer them whole into milk. This is not a recognized pathway in veterinary science. The provided backup shifts from cow's milk to human breastmilk, which is a classic bait-and-switch. While the transfer of food proteins in human breastmilk is a valid area of study, it doesn't validate the initial claim about commercial dairy. The use of a Dr. Osborne video is a major red flag. His entire platform is based on the idea that all grains are toxic, a view that far exceeds the established science on Celiac Disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and a YouTube video from a known ideological source is not that evidence."  
    • Wheatwacked
      Some backup to my statement about gluten and milk. Some background.  When my son was born in 1976 he was colicky from the beginning.  When he transitioned to formula it got really bad.  That's when we found the only pediactric gastroenterologist (in a population of 6 million that dealt with Celiac Disease (and he only had 14 patients with celiac disease), who dianosed by biopsy and started him on Nutramegen.  Recovery was quick. The portion of gluten that passes through to breastmilk is called gliadin. It is the component of gluten that causes celiac disease or gluten intolerance. What are the Effects of Gluten in Breastmilk? Gliaden, a component of gluten which is typically responsible for the intestinal reaction of gluten, DOES pass through breast milk.  This is because gliaden (as one of many food proteins) passes through the lining of your small intestine into your blood. Can gluten transmit through breast milk?  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.