Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Got My Blood Test Back - Doctor Wasn't Very Clear

joshf

Recommended Posts

joshf Newbie
joshf
Posted

Hello,

I went to my doctor last week as I have been having stomach problems the past few months. He did a blood test and after getting the results he said I may have Celiacs but should have a biopsy to be sure.

My blood test results had the following Abnormal:

Gliadin IGG, ABS = 31 HI

and

ANA W/REFLEX TO IFA is Positive

Based on these results is it very likely I have Celiacs, 50/50, or like 10% chance? I'm not exactly sure how to interpret this and the nurse that gave me the results over the phone would not really answer my questions (she just kept saying wait for the biopsy results).

Thanks.

Josh

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


mushroom Proficient
mushroom
Posted

Welcome to the board, Josh.

It is really hard to give a 'guess' as to what your odds are of having a positive biopsy, and thaat would be all it would be - a guess. Some people have positive bloods and negative biopsy, for others it is the reverse. The biopsy is said to trump the blood work results. However, once your testing is finished, even if the biopsy results are negative, you should give the diet a try because many people who do not test positive for celiac are helped by the diet.

Come back when you get your biopsy results and we will help you. Of course, feel free to ask other questions too. :)

joshf Newbie
joshf
Posted
  • Author

Hi,

Thanks for the quick response.

I know there are errors with testing and nothing is certain, but i'm just trying to get an idea.

I'm not sure if it looks like celiacs or if its a hunch?

ie: with a pregnancy test, I know its not certain, but if it says your pregnant you are likely pregnant. But if you have a high temperature, and the doctor says to test for strep its still pretty unlikely you have strep - just the next step in testing. Thats sort of where I am with these test results. Is the doctor just guessing the next step but its still unlikely or do the blood test point to celiacs and the biopsy is simply to confirm?

Thanks.

Josh

Welcome to the board, Josh.

It is really hard to give a 'guess' as to what your odds are of having a positive biopsy, and thaat would be all it would be - a guess. Some people have positive bloods and negative biopsy, for others it is the reverse. The biopsy is said to trump the blood work results. However, once your testing is finished, even if the biopsy results are negative, you should give the diet a try because many people who do not test positive for celiac are helped by the diet.

Come back when you get your biopsy results and we will help you. Of course, feel free to ask other questions too. :)

mushroom Proficient
mushroom
Posted

...do the blood test point to celiacs and the biopsy is simply to confirm?

This is the most common current medical thinking on the subject.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

It looks like your blood test was positive. False negatives are common but false positives are very uncommon if not nonexistant. You do have a chance of a false negative with the biopsy so if you are choosing to have it done wait until after the procedure is done and than start the diet. You don't have to wait for the results.

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

Doctors don't usually test IgG unless you are low IgA, which is a risk factor for celiac. ANA is not a celiac test but it means you have autoimmunity, which is another risk factor for celiac.

An immune reaction to gliadin is a good reason to try the diet even if your biopsy comes back negative. You are almost certainly gluten intolerant, which can give a lot of GI trouble much like celiac.

joshf Newbie
joshf
Posted
  • Author

Thank you all for your responses. It is greatly appreciated. What is the difference between gluton intolerant and celiacs?

Doctors don't usually test IgG unless you are low IgA, which is a risk factor for celiac. ANA is not a celiac test but it means you have autoimmunity, which is another risk factor for celiac.

An immune reaction to gliadin is a good reason to try the diet even if your biopsy comes back negative. You are almost certainly gluten intolerant, which can give a lot of GI trouble much like celiac.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


mushroom Proficient
mushroom
Posted

Thank you all for your responses. It is greatly appreciated. What is the difference between gluton intolerant and celiacs?

It goes something like this, Josh: All celiacs are gluten intolerant. Not all gluten intolerants are celiac. That is the long and the short of it.

The subject has been and is being debated endlessly, both here and amongst the medical community, and researchers, but we don't really know too much more than that now. In order to be celiac you must have damage to the small intestine, but some who are intolerant get no GI symptoms at all and no GI damage, but are struck with neurological symptoms or a host of other autoimmune diseases, some of which can occur with or without celiac. It's what makes diagnosis so difficult because so many doctors believe that if you don't have diagnosable celiac disease you are not gluten intolerant :unsure::rolleyes:

joshf Newbie
joshf
Posted
  • Author

got my biopsy results back and they came out negative...my doctor still isn't being clear and has told me to see a specialist, who has a three month wait.

So negative biopsy but positve ANA and Gliadin IGG, ABS = 31 HI - my understanding is this is an intolerance to gluten. Is that correct?

So basically I can eat gluten, but may get a stomach ache? Is there anything else I should be doing?

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

got my biopsy results back and they came out negative...my doctor still isn't being clear and has told me to see a specialist, who has a three month wait.

So negative biopsy but positve ANA and Gliadin IGG, ABS = 31 HI - my understanding is this is an intolerance to gluten. Is that correct?

So basically I can eat gluten, but may get a stomach ache? Is there anything else I should be doing?

Biopsies can have false negatives. You have postive blood work. That means your body is making antibodies to gluten. Eventually, if not already, your brain, liver, gallbladder and other organs can be impacted. Antibodies are an equal opportunity destroyer and there is no way of knowing what system will be attacked. You need to be gluten free unless you someday want a signature like mine. It is easiest to go with whole unprocessed foods as much as you can. We are here to help you in any way needed.

The positive ANA should be looked into also. There are a number of different things that could cause a positive in that test.

You could also find that after three months on the diet that test has returned to normal levels but not certain about that.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,898
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    MLucia
    Newest Member
    MLucia
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      New (possible) celiac diagnosis

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      New (possible) celiac diagnosis

      By Judy M · Posted

      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      Patiently Waiting to See Results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      Gluten free beer ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Patiently Waiting to See Results

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.