Jump to content
This site uses cookies. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. More Info... ×

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Got My Blood Test Back - Doctor Wasn't Very Clear

joshf

Recommended Posts

joshf Newbie
joshf
Posted

Hello,

I went to my doctor last week as I have been having stomach problems the past few months. He did a blood test and after getting the results he said I may have Celiacs but should have a biopsy to be sure.

My blood test results had the following Abnormal:

Gliadin IGG, ABS = 31 HI

and

ANA W/REFLEX TO IFA is Positive

Based on these results is it very likely I have Celiacs, 50/50, or like 10% chance? I'm not exactly sure how to interpret this and the nurse that gave me the results over the phone would not really answer my questions (she just kept saying wait for the biopsy results).

Thanks.

Josh

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


mushroom Proficient
mushroom
Posted

Welcome to the board, Josh.

It is really hard to give a 'guess' as to what your odds are of having a positive biopsy, and thaat would be all it would be - a guess. Some people have positive bloods and negative biopsy, for others it is the reverse. The biopsy is said to trump the blood work results. However, once your testing is finished, even if the biopsy results are negative, you should give the diet a try because many people who do not test positive for celiac are helped by the diet.

Come back when you get your biopsy results and we will help you. Of course, feel free to ask other questions too. :)

joshf Newbie
joshf
Posted
  • Author

Hi,

Thanks for the quick response.

I know there are errors with testing and nothing is certain, but i'm just trying to get an idea.

I'm not sure if it looks like celiacs or if its a hunch?

ie: with a pregnancy test, I know its not certain, but if it says your pregnant you are likely pregnant. But if you have a high temperature, and the doctor says to test for strep its still pretty unlikely you have strep - just the next step in testing. Thats sort of where I am with these test results. Is the doctor just guessing the next step but its still unlikely or do the blood test point to celiacs and the biopsy is simply to confirm?

Thanks.

Josh

Welcome to the board, Josh.

It is really hard to give a 'guess' as to what your odds are of having a positive biopsy, and thaat would be all it would be - a guess. Some people have positive bloods and negative biopsy, for others it is the reverse. The biopsy is said to trump the blood work results. However, once your testing is finished, even if the biopsy results are negative, you should give the diet a try because many people who do not test positive for celiac are helped by the diet.

Come back when you get your biopsy results and we will help you. Of course, feel free to ask other questions too. :)

mushroom Proficient
mushroom
Posted

...do the blood test point to celiacs and the biopsy is simply to confirm?

This is the most common current medical thinking on the subject.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

It looks like your blood test was positive. False negatives are common but false positives are very uncommon if not nonexistant. You do have a chance of a false negative with the biopsy so if you are choosing to have it done wait until after the procedure is done and than start the diet. You don't have to wait for the results.

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

Doctors don't usually test IgG unless you are low IgA, which is a risk factor for celiac. ANA is not a celiac test but it means you have autoimmunity, which is another risk factor for celiac.

An immune reaction to gliadin is a good reason to try the diet even if your biopsy comes back negative. You are almost certainly gluten intolerant, which can give a lot of GI trouble much like celiac.

joshf Newbie
joshf
Posted
  • Author

Thank you all for your responses. It is greatly appreciated. What is the difference between gluton intolerant and celiacs?

Doctors don't usually test IgG unless you are low IgA, which is a risk factor for celiac. ANA is not a celiac test but it means you have autoimmunity, which is another risk factor for celiac.

An immune reaction to gliadin is a good reason to try the diet even if your biopsy comes back negative. You are almost certainly gluten intolerant, which can give a lot of GI trouble much like celiac.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


mushroom Proficient
mushroom
Posted

Thank you all for your responses. It is greatly appreciated. What is the difference between gluton intolerant and celiacs?

It goes something like this, Josh: All celiacs are gluten intolerant. Not all gluten intolerants are celiac. That is the long and the short of it.

The subject has been and is being debated endlessly, both here and amongst the medical community, and researchers, but we don't really know too much more than that now. In order to be celiac you must have damage to the small intestine, but some who are intolerant get no GI symptoms at all and no GI damage, but are struck with neurological symptoms or a host of other autoimmune diseases, some of which can occur with or without celiac. It's what makes diagnosis so difficult because so many doctors believe that if you don't have diagnosable celiac disease you are not gluten intolerant :unsure::rolleyes:

joshf Newbie
joshf
Posted
  • Author

got my biopsy results back and they came out negative...my doctor still isn't being clear and has told me to see a specialist, who has a three month wait.

So negative biopsy but positve ANA and Gliadin IGG, ABS = 31 HI - my understanding is this is an intolerance to gluten. Is that correct?

So basically I can eat gluten, but may get a stomach ache? Is there anything else I should be doing?

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

got my biopsy results back and they came out negative...my doctor still isn't being clear and has told me to see a specialist, who has a three month wait.

So negative biopsy but positve ANA and Gliadin IGG, ABS = 31 HI - my understanding is this is an intolerance to gluten. Is that correct?

So basically I can eat gluten, but may get a stomach ache? Is there anything else I should be doing?

Biopsies can have false negatives. You have postive blood work. That means your body is making antibodies to gluten. Eventually, if not already, your brain, liver, gallbladder and other organs can be impacted. Antibodies are an equal opportunity destroyer and there is no way of knowing what system will be attacked. You need to be gluten free unless you someday want a signature like mine. It is easiest to go with whole unprocessed foods as much as you can. We are here to help you in any way needed.

The positive ANA should be looked into also. There are a number of different things that could cause a positive in that test.

You could also find that after three months on the diet that test has returned to normal levels but not certain about that.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,072
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    3rdearesl
    Newest Member
    3rdearesl
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Blood results

      By trents · Posted

      Maybe celiac but maybe NCGS that was misdiagnosed as IBS morphing gradually into celiac. Is NCGS a new category to you? It shares many of the same GI symptoms with celiac disease but does not damage the small bowel lining like celiac.
    • knitty kitty
      Oral thrush question

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      Thiamine has antifungal properties.  The body uses thiamine to keep bacteria and yeasts from overgrowth in the digestive system.   Fluconazole use can cause thiamine deficiency.   Supplementing with thiamine in the form Benfotiamine would be beneficial as Benfotiamine promotes intestinal healing.   Thiamine and the other B vitamins tend to be low in Celiac due to malabsorption.  Talk to your doctor about supplementing vitamins and minerals.
    • Scott Adams
      Nutrient deficiencies despite normal MARSH and strict gluten-free diet

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      Welcome @Natalia Revelo, your experience is profoundly difficult and, sadly, not entirely unique within the celiac community. It's the frustrating reality of "silent" or ongoing damage that isn't captured by the MARSH score alone, which only measures active villous atrophy. Your normal biopsy suggests your diet is preventing the classic autoimmune attack, but it doesn't mean your gut has fully healed or that other issues aren't at play. The inflammation from your newly discovered milk and egg allergies is a huge clue; this constant allergic response can create a low-grade inflammatory environment that severely hampers nutrient absorption, effectively creating a "leaky gut" scenario independent of celiac damage. This is likely why your iron stores deplete so rapidly—your body is both unable to absorb it efficiently and may be losing it through inflammation. While the functional medicine path is expensive, it's clearly providing answers and relief that traditional gastroenterology, focused solely on the gluten-free diet and biopsy results, is missing. To move forward, continue the gut-healing protocols your functional doctor recommends (perhaps exploring alternative options to glutamine that won't irritate your cystitis), maintain your strict avoidance of all allergens and irritants, and know that true healing is a multi-faceted process. You might seek a second opinion from a different gastroenterologist who is more knowledgeable about non-responsive celiac disease and the complex interplay of food allergies and micronutrient absorption, but your current path, while costly, seems to be leading you toward the steady health you need.
    • knitty kitty
      Blood results

      By knitty kitty · Posted

      Have you had a DNA test to look for Celiac disease genes?  If she doesn't have any celiac specific genes, look for another explanation.  If she does have Celiac genes, assume they are turned on and active Celiac disease is progressing.  All first degree relatives (mother, father, siblings, children) should be genetically tested as well.   Sometimes blood tests are ambiguous or false negatives if one has anemia, diabetes or thiamine deficiency.  Certain medications like antihistamines and steroids can suppress the immune system and result in false negatives or ambiguous results on antibody tests.  
    • Heatherisle
      Blood results

      By Heatherisle · Posted

      That was just the visual report, so need to wait for confirmation or otherwise from the results. They did take a biopsy from the upper end of the duodenum(D1). D2 looked unremarkable on the camera. Just wish we didn’t have to wait so long for the results as she’s naturally a very anxious person. But thanks so much for taking the time to answer me
×
×
  • Create New...