Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Multiple Biopsies Taken, Only 1 Read?


superfob

Recommended Posts

superfob Contributor

Hi,

I just got my pathology report in the mail. All my results came back negative with "No significant pathologic abnormality". I tested TTG negative and AGA IgA positive, so I was hoping for some inflammation or increased lymphocytes, or partial atrophy.

I'm reading the description of my biopsies, and for duodenum it says "Received in formalin is a 0.3 x 0.2 x 0.2 cm fragment of tan tissue, submitted toto in 1 cassette C." It seems like they only read one biopsy??!

From the report, they also read 1 fragment from my ileum, 2 fragments from my stomach (antrum), and "multiple fragments" from my colon.

I'm so confused as why this is, because right after my procedure, when I got my report, it says "The examined duodenum was normal. Biopsies were taken with a cold forceps for evaluation of celiac disease x6" I assumed that this would mean 6 samples, but my pathology report is only saying one?

I know I need to ask my doctor about this, but the appointment is over a month away, so looking for some help interpreting this.

Thanks


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



mushroom Proficient

It appears you had both a colonoscopy and an endoscopy. Biopsy samples were submitted as follows: one from the duodenum; two from the stomach, one from the ileum (lower part of the small intestine, which would have to be obtained from the colonoscopy) and "multiple" fragments from the colon. So yes, there was only one sample taken from the upper part of the small intestine, the duodenum. I think it would be a case of only one sample being submitted, not of only one sample being read. The lab has an obligation to read what is submitted. I think the onus is on the doctor, not on the lab. I don't know why they would describe it as 6 samples testing for celiac when you cannot test for celiac from the colon. :o

kareng Grand Master

It appears you had both a colonoscopy and an endoscopy. Biopsy samples were submitted as follows: one from the duodenum; two from the stomach, one from the ileum (lower part of the small intestine, which would have to be obtained from the colonoscopy) and "multiple" fragments from the colon. So yes, there was only one sample taken from the upper part of the small intestine, the duodenum. I think it would be a case of only one sample being submitted, not of only one sample being read. The lab has an obligation to read what is submitted. I think the onus is on the doctor, not on the lab. I don't know why they would describe it as 6 samples testing for celiac when you cannot test for celiac from the colon. :o

I agree with Shroomie. 6 total biopsies taken from different places. The part about the Celiac diagnosis was the pre- procedure diagnosis the doctor gave as a reason for the procedures. If that was the only diagnosis given the insurance company, they should not have approved a colonoscopy. Just show they don't get it either.

You will need to write a letter, probably several times,, to the insurance company. Include info from Celiac Disease Centers to explain why you must get a new GI and do the endo part again.

superfob Contributor

Hmmm, I think the "x6" part was specifically referring to the duodenum. There are other parts in the report where they talk about taking biopsies for the ileum and colon.

I guess the way I interpreted the report, was that my doctor took multiple samples during the procedure, but only sent off one to the lab.

O, and my doctor does know that Celiac can only be tested with samples from the small intestine. The colonoscopy was just to rule out other causes of my stool changes.

I'm just wondering why only one sample was sent to the lab, but I guess the only way to find out is to call his office/talk to him in person.

Sorry for the confusion!

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,898
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    MLucia
    Newest Member
    MLucia
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.