Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Three Questions


waterlily-

Recommended Posts

waterlily- Explorer

First, How long does it take to heal from gluten intolerance? I'm not severely intolerant. For example, I can eat two cookies and not get sick. (I am stopping doing that by the way as I found good recipes) So I wondered if it depended on how severe ones reaction to gluten is?

Second, what vitamins should I be taking on top of a multi vitamin? I know that with this you can be deficient in some things but I'm not sure what to get and what I need the most.

Third, Is it true that intolerance can develop into celiac's disease? I wouldn't think so..I would think that ones intolerance could become more severe if left alone, right?

Thanks!


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Korwyn Explorer

First, How long does it take to heal from gluten intolerance? I'm not severely intolerant. For example, I can eat two cookies and not get sick. (I am stopping doing that by the way as I found good recipes) So I wondered if it depended on how severe ones reaction to gluten is?

Heal or recover? If you don't have celiac disease but non-celiac gluten sensitivity there probably isn't any 'healing' in the sense most people here normally use - in the strictest interpretation of the medical research. But your time to recover from the symptoms/effect may vary wildly from days to a couple weeks.

Second, what vitamins should I be taking on top of a multi vitamin? I know that with this you can be deficient in some things but I'm not sure what to get and what I need the most.

Unless you have celiac disease you should not be suffering gluten related malabsorption issues. This is not to say you don't have undiagnosed/untreated celiac disease. If you do exhibit signs of vitamin deficiency, you should probably have a full nutrition/blood workup. This is where a good ND can assist you as they generally seem to be more willing to order a full CBC with vitamin/mineral/hormone workups.

Third, Is it true that intolerance can develop into celiac's disease? I wouldn't think so..I would think that ones intolerance could become more severe if left alone, right?

You are going to get a number of varying answers on this. celiac disease requires a gene plus an environmental trigger to actually become 'active'. However, it appears that most people who have a gluten sensitivity probably carry at least one of the known celiac genetic markers. So chances are if you have a gluten sensitivity your already have potential to develop celiac disease. There is some feeling (depending on who you read and what research you follow) that gluten sensitivity is merely undiagnosed, asymptomatic, or undetectable (by current methods) celiac disease. This is the camp that I tend to fall into, but this is logically impossible to prove unless they find another positive cause for gluten sensitivity other than celiac disease.

You may have a lifelong intolerance and never develop celiac disease. You may have no intolerance or symptoms and suddenly develop celiac disease for any number of reasons. You may have an intolerance and they have celiac disease become fully active. There is no definite answer to your third question. :/

* Edited to add to my answer for question #2 *

Jestgar Rising Star

Third, Is it true that intolerance can develop into celiac's disease? I wouldn't think so..I would think that ones intolerance could become more severe if left alone, right?

There is no known answer to this. Any responses you get are people's opinions, although some people feel quite strongly about theirs. :P

Korwyn Explorer

There is no known answer to this. Any responses you get are people's opinions, although some people feel quite strongly about theirs. :P

Of course I feel strongly about my correct opinion! :P:D

GlutenFreeManna Rising Star

First, How long does it take to heal from gluten intolerance? I'm not severely intolerant. For example, I can eat two cookies and not get sick. (I am stopping doing that by the way as I found good recipes) So I wondered if it depended on how severe ones reaction to gluten is?

Second, what vitamins should I be taking on top of a multi vitamin? I know that with this you can be deficient in some things but I'm not sure what to get and what I need the most.

Third, Is it true that intolerance can develop into celiac's disease? I wouldn't think so..I would think that ones intolerance could become more severe if left alone, right?

Thanks!

1. Are you asking how long you have to be gluten-free before you are okay and can go back to eating it again? If so, the answer is NEVER. Whether you have celiac or non-celaic gluten intolerance a strict, 100% gluten-free diet for life is required. Just because you can eat a little bit without symptoms does NOT mean that the cookies are not doing damage to your body.

2. Have your vitamin levels checked to find out if you are deficient in anything first. Some vitamins you cannot overdose on, but many of them can be dangerous if you take to much and can do things like damage your liver or kidneys. It's important to consult with your dr so you are just taking what your NEED.

3. As the others said it depends on who you ask. I have seen many personal accounts on here of people who had repeated tests that were negative yet they had symptoms. They continued to eat gluten because the tests were negative until years later when they were much, much sicker they finally got a positive test result for celiac. So it's somewhat of a semantical problem, imo. They were reacting to gluten for years prior to getting a positive test result--Were they "gluten intolerant" until the celiac diagnosis or were they celiac disease sufferers that could not be diagnosed because the current tests are not good enough? I think there is a different diagnosis of gluten intolerance that is valid and not the same thing as celiac disease. however I also think there are a lot of celaic disease suffers walkign around with the label of non-celiac gluten intolerant just because the medical field and testing has not caught up to the same standards for other diseases. Since there's no money in researching this type of question (i.e. no drugs to help gluten-intolerants/celiacs) there is very little research into the difference. Some big strides have been made in improving testing in the past decade but IMO they are not enough and too few drs know about the subject.

waterlily- Explorer

1. Are you asking how long you have to be gluten-free before you are okay and can go back to eating it again? If so, the answer is NEVER. Whether you have celiac or non-celaic gluten intolerance a strict, 100% gluten-free diet for life is required. Just because you can eat a little bit without symptoms does NOT mean that the cookies are not doing damage to your body.

No, I meant how long for my gut to heal from eating the gluten before. If it just varies from person to person and how you can tell.

GlutenFreeManna Rising Star

No, I meant how long for my gut to heal from eating the gluten before. If it just varies from person to person and how you can tell.

Sorry. It varies from person to person. The main way to tell is to by having a repeat biospy in 6 months to a year, if that is how you were diagnosed. You can also have the blood tests redone to see if antibodies decrease and if your initial vitamin and mineral panels are low then you can know if you are absorbing vitamins again when they are back to normal and you feel better. If you haven't had any of that testing done (as I have not) you won't really know except based on how you feel and what you are able to eat. I knew my vitamin levels had to be back to close to normal when my hair was no longer falling out in clumps and my nails were growing again. I knew my gut was getting better when I started to be able to digest more raw veggies and more beans (in the beginning I could not handle beans, raw salads and lots of nuts).


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,202
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    PatBurnham
    Newest Member
    PatBurnham
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      NCGS does not cause damage to the small bowel villi so, if indeed you were not skimping on gluten when you had the antibody blood testing done, it is likely you have celiac disease.
    • Scott Adams
      I will assume you did the gluten challenge properly and were eating a lot of gluten daily for 6-8 weeks before your test, but if not, that could be the issue. You can still have celiac disease with negative blood test results, although it's not as common:  Clinical and genetic profile of patients with seronegative coeliac disease: the natural history and response to gluten-free diet: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5606118/  Seronegative Celiac Disease - A Challenging Case: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9441776/  Enteropathies with villous atrophy but negative coeliac serology in adults: current issues: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34764141/  Approximately 10x more people have non-celiac gluten sensitivity than have celiac disease, but there isn’t yet a test for NCGS. If your symptoms go away on a gluten-free diet it would likely signal NCGS.
    • Xravith
      I'm very confused... My blood test came out negative, I checked all antibodies. I suppose my Total IgA levels are normal (132 mg/dl), so the test should be reliable. Still, I'm not relieved as I can't tolerate even a single biscuit. I need to talk to my doctor about whether a duodenal biopsy is necessary. But it is really possible to have intestinal damage despite having a seronegative results? I have really strong symptoms, and I don't want to keep skipping university lectures or being bedridden at home.
    • Scott Adams
      They may want to also eliminate other possible causes for your symptoms/issues and are doing additional tests.  Here is info about blood tests for celiac disease--if positive an endoscopy where biopsies of your intestinal villi are taken to confirm is the typical follow up.    
    • Scott Adams
      In the Europe the new protocol for making a celiac disease diagnosis in children is if their tTg-IgA (tissue transglutaminase IgA) levels are 10 times or above the positive level for celiac disease--and you are above that level. According to the latest research, if the blood test results are at certain high levels that range between 5-10 times the reference range for a positive celiac disease diagnosis, it may not be necessary to confirm the results using an endoscopy/biopsy: Blood Test Alone Can Diagnose Celiac Disease in Most Children and Adults TGA-IgA at or Above Five Times Normal Limit in Kids Indicates Celiac Disease in Nearly All Cases No More Biopsies to Diagnose Celiac Disease in Children! May I ask why you've had so many past tTg-IgA tests done, and many of them seem to have been done 3 times during short time intervals?    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.