Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How Can I Get In To See The Doc Sooner

Newbee

By Newbee
in Doctors

Recommended Posts

Newbee Contributor
Newbee
Posted

So I got the celiac blood work back from GP and it was extremely positive (125). She referred me to see a GI doctor. I got a recommendation for a good GI doctor from someone that leads a celiac support group in town. When I called to make an appointment they told me I'd have to wait a month before I could see the doctor (and that's just for a consultation - not even the biopsy yet). They knew when I called in that it was because I had a positive blood test for celiac. I've since called back and asked if they have a waiting list and could they put me on it in case an opening came available for my doctor so that I could be seen sooner. They said yes. Not sure if that will help or not. Just wondering if anyone had any suggestions on how else I may coax them to get me in earlier. Seems like they should be able to try and fit me in sooner so I can have the biopsy and stop eating gluten and get on with my life. I hate to wait so long and continue to damage my system. And if I have to wait a month for a consultation will I have to wait a month of more for the biopsy? I was thinking maybe I should still call in and check about cancellations or perhaps try and speak to a nurse and see if I can get them to convince them to try and get me in earlier. Any suggestions would be great! Thanks.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


MJ-S Contributor
MJ-S
Posted

Discussing with the nurse sounds like a great idea to me.

Here's a question: If your biopsy is negative would you continue to gluten, knowing that your blood tests were positive?

If it were me, I would stop eating gluten immediately, because I don't see how the results of the biopsy would change this decision.

I'm sure others on the board are more knowledgeable about this, but the intestines take a longer time to heal than it takes for antibody levels to reduce, so I would think you could stop eating gluten, have a biopsy four weeks later, and still see the damage (assuming it's there to begin with).

Newbee Contributor
Newbee
Posted
  • Author

I've read that you should continue to consume gluten until after you've had the biopsy otherwise you could have a false negative result. I figure if I'm going to go through with doing the biopsy (which I'd rather not as it sounds kind of scary but figure I better) I should make sure I do what I can so they can get an accurate result.

  • 3 weeks later...
vendeengf Newbie
vendeengf
Posted

I've read that you should continue to consume gluten until after you've had the biopsy otherwise you could have a false negative result. I figure if I'm going to go through with doing the biopsy (which I'd rather not as it sounds kind of scary but figure I better) I should make sure I do what I can so they can get an accurate result.

ok how i see it is u can stop and feel better or keep eating it and feel like crap . i got my blood work back and it was positive i stopped eating gluten right there and then 6 weeks later i saw the doc 3 weeks later was scoped down the mouth then 3 weeks later took a pill(cam) not so good then 4 weeks later scpoed other end way worse then they though pollip the size of sode pop cap my doc told me he has never seen one that size that isnt cancer befor or someone my age so i say stop

mushroom Proficient
mushroom
Posted

Cancellation lists work sometimes and sometimes they don't. It depends how popular the doctor is and how many people are ahead of you on the list (an important question to ask). I recently had one work for me - ended up with a dud doc, but he ordered the right test. So I saw him on Fri, had test on Mon., but they said it would be five weeks for follow-up. On the cancellation list I saw him within one week so got a copy of the report, which is what I wanted. But generally the good docs are all booked up and have lists of people waiting for cancellations. I waited 2 months last year for a cancellation and didn't get it (didn't think to ask how many people were also waiting :( ).

As for the biopsy, many people (mainly not doctors who make money from doing procedures :P ) feel it is not necessary. After all, as a pp said, if gluten makes you sick would you continue to eat it if your biopsy was negative? However, if you want the "gold standard of celiac diagnosis, you should continue to eat gluten to be sure of an accurate result. While the EGD can tell you other things besides if you have celiac, it can always be done at a later time if they are looking for something else if your symptoms do not resolve on a gluten-free diet.

GlutenFreeManna Rising Star
GlutenFreeManna
Posted

Call and talk to the appointment taker. Explain that you are on the waiting list already but your really, really need to get in sooner. Ask if there is a certain time of day when you can call everyday and ask if there have been any cancelations. This worked for me last year when I had pneumonia but the ER dr said it might be something more serious based on the cloud on my lung x-ray. I needed to see a pulmonologist ASAP because everyday my breathing was getting worse. I was scared to death it might be lung cancer. The earliest appointment was a month away. I took that appointment but also asked what I could do to get in sooner. They put me on the waiting list but admitted that was a pretty long list of others also wanting to get in sooner. The appointment taker took pity on me (probably because I could barely talk) and told me that if I called everyday at 8 AM that is when they would know if anyone had called to leave a cancellation message the previous night. She got in at 7:30 and reviewed the messages in the first half hour. Although they have the waiting list and would go in order when assigning people to any cancelations she said if someone called at 8:00 AM (the office open time) that she would give any canceled slots to the person on the phone before pulling up the waiting list. It took calling everyday for a week but I did get in earlier and only had to spend about two weeks total thinking I was dying from lung cancer (turned out I just had a bad case of pneumonia and the shadow on my lung was scarring from previous lung infections).

love2travel Mentor
love2travel
Posted

Our typical wait lists for specialists vary from 6-18 MONTHS. I had to wait 8 months for an MRI after an injury; 16 months to see an orthopedic surgeon; 18 months to see a chronic pain management physician; 12 months for a neurosurgeon and so on. Pretty grim here in Canada in many ways. Thankfully I only had to wait to see a gastroenterologist 4 months. My second MRI was only 6 months.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


Jungle Rookie
Jungle
Posted

I am also from Canada and the 6 month wait for the scope is what made me decide not to wait but just to get on with it. I went gluten-free after a Ttg of 193. Four months later I am doing better but not as much as I'd hoped. I keep thinking it takes adults 2-5 years to heal. So I can't expect to be all better right away.

love2travel Mentor
love2travel
Posted

I am also from Canada and the 6 month wait for the scope is what made me decide not to wait but just to get on with it. I went gluten-free after a Ttg of 193. Four months later I am doing better but not as much as I'd hoped. I keep thinking it takes adults 2-5 years to heal. So I can't expect to be all better right away.

Aren't the waits insane? I was told I could fly to the U.S. for an earlier appointment but as I had to eat lots of gluten for at least three months anyway I decided to go ahead and wait. (I went on the gluten challenge as gluten gives me absolutely zero GI symptoms and as such I was somewhat in denial - I need proof on paper!)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      132,391
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    JudyE
    Newest Member
    JudyE
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Blood tests low iGA 4 years later digestive issues

      By trents · Posted

      Keep us posted.
    • Clear2me
      Gluten free nuts

      By Clear2me · Posted

      Thanks for the info. I recently moved to CA from Wyoming and in that western region the Costco and Sam's /Walmart Brands have many nuts and more products that are labeled gluten free. I was told it's because those products are packaged and processed  in different  plants. Some plants can be labeled  gluten free because the plant does not also package gluten products and they know that for example the trucks, containers equipment are not used to handle wheat, barely or Rye. The Walmart butter in the western region says gluten free but not here. Most of The Kirkland and Members Mark brands in CA say they are from Vietnam. That's not the case in Wyoming and Colorado. I've spoken to customer service at the stores here in California. They were not helpful. I check labels every time I go to the store. The stores where I am are a Sh*tshow. The Magalopoly grocery chain Vons/Safeway/Albertsons, etc. are the same. Fishers and Planters brands no longer say gluten free. It could be regional. There are nuts with sugar coatings and fruit and nut mixes at the big chains that are labeled gluten free but I don't want the fruit or sugar.  It's so difficult I am considering moving again. I thought it would be easier to find safe food in a more populated area. It's actually worse.  I was undiagnosed for most of my life but not because I didn't try to figure it out. So I have had all the complications possible. I don't have any spare organs left.  No a little gluten will hurt you. The autoimmune process continues to destroy your organs though you may not feel it. If you are getting a little all the time and as much as we try we probably all are and so the damage is happening. Now the FDA has pretty much abandoned celiacs. There are no requirements for labeling for common allergens on medications. All the generic drugs made outside the US are not regulated for common allergens and the FDA is taking the last gluten free porcine Thyroid med, NP Thyroid, off the market in 2026. I was being glutened by a generic levothyroxin. The insurance wouldn't pay for the gluten free brand any longer because the FDA took them all off their approved formulary. So now I am paying $147 out of pocket for NP Thyroid but shortly I will have no safe choice. Other people with allergies should be aware that these foreign generic pharmaceutical producers are using ground shellfish shell as pill coatings and anti-desicants. The FDA knows this but  now just waits for consumers to complain or die. The take over of Wholefoods by Amazon destroyed a very reliable source of good high quality food for people with allergies and for people who wanted good reliably organic food. Bezos thought  he could make a fortune off people who were paying alot for organic and allergen free food by substituting cheap brands from Thailand. He didn't understand who the customers were who were willing to pay more for that food and why. I went from spending hundreds to nothing because Bezo removed every single trusted brand that I was buying. Now they are closing Whole foods stores across the country. In CA, Mill Valley store (closed July 2025) and the National Blvd. store in West Los Angeles (closed October 2025). The Cupertino store will close.  In recent years I have learned to be careful and trust no one. I have been deleberately glutened in a restaurant that was my favorite (a new employee). The Chef owner was not in the kitchen that night. I've had  a metal scouring pad cut up over my food.The chain offered gluten free dishes but it only takes one crazy who thinks you're a problem as a food fadist. Good thing I always look. Good thing they didn't do that to food going to a child with a busy mom.  I give big tips and apologize for having to ask in restaurants but mental illness seem to be rampant. I've learn the hard way.          I don't buy any processed food that doesn't say gluten free.  I am a life long Catholic. I worked for the Church while at college. I don't go to Church anymore because the men at the top decided Jesus is gluten. The special hosts are gluten less not gluten free. No I can't drink wine after people with gluten in their mouth and a variety of deadly germs. I have been abandoned and excluded by my Church/Family.  Having nearly died several times, safe food is paramount. If your immune system collapses as mine did, you get sepsis. It can kill you very quickly. I spent 5 days unconscious and had to have my appendix and gall bladder removed because they were necrotic. I was 25. They didn't figure out I had celiac till I was 53. No one will take the time to tell you what can happen when your immune system gets overwhelmed from its constant fighting the gluten and just stops. It is miserable that our food is processed so carelessly. Our food in many aspects is not safe. And the merging of all the grocery chains has made it far worse. Its a disaster. Krogers also recently purchased Vitacost where I was getting the products I could no longer get at Whole Foods. Kroger is eliminating those products from Vitacost just a Bezos did from WF. I am looking for reliable and certified sources for nuts. I have lived the worst consequences of the disease and being exposed unknowingly and maliciously. Once I was diagnosed I learned way more than anyone should have to about the food industry.  I don't do gray areas. And now I dont eat out except very rarely.  I have not eaten fast food for 30 years before the celiac diagnosis. Gluten aside..... It's not food and it's not safe.  No one has got our backs. Sharing safe food sources is one thing we can do to try to be safe.        
    • Mmoc
      Blood tests low iGA 4 years later digestive issues

      By Mmoc · Posted

      Thank you kindly for your response. I have since gotten the other type of bloods done and am awaiting results. 
    • Aretaeus Cappadocia
      Gluten free nuts

      By Aretaeus Cappadocia · Posted

      I wanted to respond to your post as much for other people who read this later on (I'm not trying to contradict your experience or decisions) > Kirkland Signature Super Extra-Large Peanuts, 2.5 lbs, are labeled "gluten free" in the Calif Costcos I've been in. If they are selling non-gluten-free in your store, I suggest talking to customer service to see if they can get you the gluten-free version (they are tasty) > This past week I bought "Sliced Raw Almonds, Baking Nuts, 5 lbs Item 1495072 Best if used by Jun-10-26 W-261-6-L1A 12:47" at Costco. The package has the standard warning that it was made on machinery that <may> have processed wheat. Based on that alone, I would not eat these. However, I contacted customer service and asked them "are Costco's Sliced Almonds gluten free?" Within a day I got this response:  "This is [xyz] with the Costco Member Service Resolutions Team. I am happy to let you know we got a reply back from our Kirkland Signature team. Here is their response:  This item does not have a risk of cross contamination with gluten, barley or rye." Based on this, I will eat them. Based on experience, I believe they will be fine. Sometimes, for other products, the answer has been "they really do have cross-contamination risk" (eg, Kirkland Signature Dry Roasted Macadamia Nuts, Salted, 1.5 lbs Item 1195303). When they give me that answer I return them for cash. You might reasonably ask, "Why would Costco use that label if they actually are safe?" I can't speak for Costco but I've worked in Corporate America and I've seen this kind of thing first hand and up close. (1) This kind of regulatory label represents risk/cost to the company. What if they are mistaken? In one direction, the cost is loss of maybe 1% of sales (if celiacs don't buy when they would have). In the other direction, the risk is reputational damage and open-ended litigation (bad reviews and celiacs suing them). Expect them to play it safe. (2) There is a team tasked with getting each product out to market quickly and cheaply, and there is also a committee tasked with reviewing the packaging before it is released. If the team chooses the simplest, safest, pre-approved label, this becomes a quick check box. On the other hand, if they choose something else, it has to be carefully scrutinized through a long process. It's more efficient for the team to say there <could> be risk. (3) There is probably some plug and play in production. Some lots of the very same product could be made in a safe facility while others are made in an unsafe facility. Uniform packaging (saying there is risk) for all packages regardless of gluten risk is easier, cheaper, and safer (for Costco). Everything I wrote here is about my Costco experience, but the principles will be true at other vendors, particularly if they have extensive quality control infrastructure. The first hurdle of gluten-free diet is to remove/replace all the labeled gluten ingredients. The second, more difficult hurdle is to remove/replace all the hidden gluten. Each of us have to assess gray zones and make judgement calls knowing there is a penalty for being wrong. One penalty would be getting glutened but the other penalty could be eating an unnecessarily boring or malnourishing diet.
    • trents
      Has anyone had terrible TMJ/ Jaw Pain from undiagnosed Celiac?

      By trents · Posted

      Thanks for the thoughtful reply and links, Wheatwacked. Definitely some food for thought. However, I would point out that your linked articles refer to gliadin in human breast milk, not cow's milk. And although it might seem reasonable to conclude it would work the same way in cows, that is not necessarily the case. Studies seem to indicate otherwise. Studies also indicate the amount of gliadin in human breast milk is miniscule and unlikely to cause reactions:  https://www.glutenfreewatchdog.org/news/gluten-peptides-in-human-breast-milk-implications-for-cows-milk/ I would also point out that Dr. Peter Osborne's doctorate is in chiropractic medicine, though he also has studied and, I believe, holds some sort of certifications in nutritional science. To put it plainly, he is considered by many qualified medical and nutritional professionals to be on the fringe of quackery. But he has a dedicated and rabid following, nonetheless.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.