Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

How Can I Get In To See The Doc Sooner


Newbee

Recommended Posts

Newbee Contributor

So I got the celiac blood work back from GP and it was extremely positive (125). She referred me to see a GI doctor. I got a recommendation for a good GI doctor from someone that leads a celiac support group in town. When I called to make an appointment they told me I'd have to wait a month before I could see the doctor (and that's just for a consultation - not even the biopsy yet). They knew when I called in that it was because I had a positive blood test for celiac. I've since called back and asked if they have a waiting list and could they put me on it in case an opening came available for my doctor so that I could be seen sooner. They said yes. Not sure if that will help or not. Just wondering if anyone had any suggestions on how else I may coax them to get me in earlier. Seems like they should be able to try and fit me in sooner so I can have the biopsy and stop eating gluten and get on with my life. I hate to wait so long and continue to damage my system. And if I have to wait a month for a consultation will I have to wait a month of more for the biopsy? I was thinking maybe I should still call in and check about cancellations or perhaps try and speak to a nurse and see if I can get them to convince them to try and get me in earlier. Any suggestions would be great! Thanks.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



MJ-S Contributor

Discussing with the nurse sounds like a great idea to me.

Here's a question: If your biopsy is negative would you continue to gluten, knowing that your blood tests were positive?

If it were me, I would stop eating gluten immediately, because I don't see how the results of the biopsy would change this decision.

I'm sure others on the board are more knowledgeable about this, but the intestines take a longer time to heal than it takes for antibody levels to reduce, so I would think you could stop eating gluten, have a biopsy four weeks later, and still see the damage (assuming it's there to begin with).

Newbee Contributor

I've read that you should continue to consume gluten until after you've had the biopsy otherwise you could have a false negative result. I figure if I'm going to go through with doing the biopsy (which I'd rather not as it sounds kind of scary but figure I better) I should make sure I do what I can so they can get an accurate result.

  • 3 weeks later...
vendeengf Newbie

I've read that you should continue to consume gluten until after you've had the biopsy otherwise you could have a false negative result. I figure if I'm going to go through with doing the biopsy (which I'd rather not as it sounds kind of scary but figure I better) I should make sure I do what I can so they can get an accurate result.

ok how i see it is u can stop and feel better or keep eating it and feel like crap . i got my blood work back and it was positive i stopped eating gluten right there and then 6 weeks later i saw the doc 3 weeks later was scoped down the mouth then 3 weeks later took a pill(cam) not so good then 4 weeks later scpoed other end way worse then they though pollip the size of sode pop cap my doc told me he has never seen one that size that isnt cancer befor or someone my age so i say stop

mushroom Proficient

Cancellation lists work sometimes and sometimes they don't. It depends how popular the doctor is and how many people are ahead of you on the list (an important question to ask). I recently had one work for me - ended up with a dud doc, but he ordered the right test. So I saw him on Fri, had test on Mon., but they said it would be five weeks for follow-up. On the cancellation list I saw him within one week so got a copy of the report, which is what I wanted. But generally the good docs are all booked up and have lists of people waiting for cancellations. I waited 2 months last year for a cancellation and didn't get it (didn't think to ask how many people were also waiting :( ).

As for the biopsy, many people (mainly not doctors who make money from doing procedures :P ) feel it is not necessary. After all, as a pp said, if gluten makes you sick would you continue to eat it if your biopsy was negative? However, if you want the "gold standard of celiac diagnosis, you should continue to eat gluten to be sure of an accurate result. While the EGD can tell you other things besides if you have celiac, it can always be done at a later time if they are looking for something else if your symptoms do not resolve on a gluten-free diet.

GlutenFreeManna Rising Star

Call and talk to the appointment taker. Explain that you are on the waiting list already but your really, really need to get in sooner. Ask if there is a certain time of day when you can call everyday and ask if there have been any cancelations. This worked for me last year when I had pneumonia but the ER dr said it might be something more serious based on the cloud on my lung x-ray. I needed to see a pulmonologist ASAP because everyday my breathing was getting worse. I was scared to death it might be lung cancer. The earliest appointment was a month away. I took that appointment but also asked what I could do to get in sooner. They put me on the waiting list but admitted that was a pretty long list of others also wanting to get in sooner. The appointment taker took pity on me (probably because I could barely talk) and told me that if I called everyday at 8 AM that is when they would know if anyone had called to leave a cancellation message the previous night. She got in at 7:30 and reviewed the messages in the first half hour. Although they have the waiting list and would go in order when assigning people to any cancelations she said if someone called at 8:00 AM (the office open time) that she would give any canceled slots to the person on the phone before pulling up the waiting list. It took calling everyday for a week but I did get in earlier and only had to spend about two weeks total thinking I was dying from lung cancer (turned out I just had a bad case of pneumonia and the shadow on my lung was scarring from previous lung infections).

love2travel Mentor

Our typical wait lists for specialists vary from 6-18 MONTHS. I had to wait 8 months for an MRI after an injury; 16 months to see an orthopedic surgeon; 18 months to see a chronic pain management physician; 12 months for a neurosurgeon and so on. Pretty grim here in Canada in many ways. Thankfully I only had to wait to see a gastroenterologist 4 months. My second MRI was only 6 months.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Jungle Rookie

I am also from Canada and the 6 month wait for the scope is what made me decide not to wait but just to get on with it. I went gluten-free after a Ttg of 193. Four months later I am doing better but not as much as I'd hoped. I keep thinking it takes adults 2-5 years to heal. So I can't expect to be all better right away.

love2travel Mentor

I am also from Canada and the 6 month wait for the scope is what made me decide not to wait but just to get on with it. I went gluten-free after a Ttg of 193. Four months later I am doing better but not as much as I'd hoped. I keep thinking it takes adults 2-5 years to heal. So I can't expect to be all better right away.

Aren't the waits insane? I was told I could fly to the U.S. for an earlier appointment but as I had to eat lots of gluten for at least three months anyway I decided to go ahead and wait. (I went on the gluten challenge as gluten gives me absolutely zero GI symptoms and as such I was somewhat in denial - I need proof on paper!)

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - trents replied to JudyLou's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    2. - JudyLou posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Seeking advice on potential gluten challenge

    3. - marzian commented on Scott Adams's article in Diagnosis, Testing & Treatment
      5

      A Future Beyond the Gluten-Free Diet? Scientists Test a New Cell Therapy for Celiac Disease (+Video)

    4. - Jmartes71 posted a topic in Related Issues & Disorders
      0

      Medications

    5. - Scott Adams replied to GlutenFreeChef's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      11

      Blood Test for Celiac wheat type matters?

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,136
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    GFTom
    Newest Member
    GFTom
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @JudyLou! There are a couple of things you might consider to help you in your decision that would not require you to do a gluten challenge. The first, that is if you have not had this test run already, is to request a "total IGA" test to be run. One of the reasons that celiac blood antibody tests can be negative, apart from not having celiac disease, that is, is because of IGA deficiency. If a person is IGA deficient, they will not respond accurately to the celiac disease blood antibody tests (such as the commonly run TTG-IGA). The total IGA test is designed to check for IGA deficiency. The total IGA test is not a celiac antibody test so I wouldn't think that a gluten challenge is necessary. The second is to have genetic testing done to determine if you have the genetic potential to develop celiac disease. About 30-40% of  the general population have the genetic potential but only about 1% actually develop celiac disease. So, genetic testing cannot be used to diagnose celiac disease but it can be used to rule it out. Those who don't have the genetic potential but still have reaction to gluten would not be diagnosed with celiac disease but with NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity).  Another possibility is that you do have celiac disease but are in remission. We do see this but often it doesn't last.
    • JudyLou
      Hi there, I’m debating whether to consider a gluten challenge and I’m hoping someone here can help with that decision (so far, none of the doctors have been helpful). I have a history of breaking out in a horrible, burning/itchy somewhat blistering rash about every 8 years. This started when I was in my early 30’s and at that point it started at the ankles and went about to my knees. Every time I had the rash it would cover more of my body, so my arms and part of my torso were impacted as well, and it was always symmetrical. First I was told it was an allergic reaction to a bug bite. Next I was told it was eczema (after a biopsy of the lesion - not the skin near the lesion) and given a steroid injection (didn’t help). I took myself off of gluten about 3 weeks before seeing an allergist, just to see if it would help (it didn’t in that time period). He thought the rash looked like dermatitis herpetiformis and told me to eat some bread the night before my blood tests, which I did, and the tests came back negative. I’ve since learned from this forum that I needed to be eating gluten daily for at least a month in order to get an accurate test result. I’m grateful to the allergist as he found that 5 mg of doxepin daily will eliminate the rash within about 10 days (previously it lasted for months whether I was eating gluten or not). I have been gluten free for about 25 years as a precaution and recommendation from my doctor, and the pattern of breaking out every 8 years or so remains the same except once I broke out after just one year (was not glutened as far as I know), and now it’s been over 9 years. What’s confusing to me, is that there have been 3 times in the past 2 years when I’ve accidentally eaten gluten, and I haven’t had any reaction at all. Once someone made pancakes (they said they were gluten-free, they were not) and I ate several. I need to decide whether to do a gluten challenge and get another blood test. If I do, are these tests really accurate? I’m also concerned that I could damage my gut in that process if I do have celiac disease. My brother and cousin both had lymphoma so that’s a concern regarding a challenge as well, though there is a lot of cancer in various forms in my family so there may be no gluten connection there. Sorry for the ramble, I’m just doubting the need to remain gluten free if I don’t have any reaction to eating it and haven’t had a positive test (other than testing positive for one of the genes, though it sounds like that’s pretty common). I’d appreciate any thoughts or advice! 
    • Jmartes71
      Hello, just popped in my head to ask this question about medications and celiac? I have always had refurse reaction to meds since I can remember  of what little meds my body is able to tolerate. I was taking gabapentin 300mg for a week,  in past I believe 150? Any ways it amps me up not able to sleep, though very tired.However I did notice it helped with my bloating sibo belly.I hate that my body is that sensitive and medical doesn't seem to take seriously. Im STILL healing with my skin, eye, and now ms or meningioma ( will know in April  which)and dealing with this limbo nightmare. I did write my name, address ect on the reclamation but im not tech savvy and not sure if went through properly. I called my city representative in Stanislaus County and asked if theres a physical paper i can sign for proclamation for celiac and she had no clue about what I was saying, so I just said I'll go back on website. 
    • Scott Adams
      I'm not saying that some celiacs won't need it, but it should be done under a doctor's supervision because it can cause lots of problems in some people.
    • Jmartes71
      I also noticed I get debilitating migraines when I smell gluten, wheat and its not taken seriously when it affects one in every way.Im still begging to properly be heard.I also noticed tolerance level is down the drain with age and life changes. I have been told by incompetent medical that im not celiac or that sensitive. Diagnosed in 1994 by gi biopsy gluten-free ever since along with other lovely food allergies. Prayers
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.