Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

If + Blood Test Why Biopsy? Son Was +

carecare

Recommended Posts

carecare Enthusiast
carecare
Posted

I found out already today that his celiac blood test was positive. Well, the nurse called and said "weak positive". I'm going to pick up a copy of the results tomorrow and see what you guys think. His ped wants to refer us to a ped. GI doctor. Since a positive is a positive...I shouldn't have to think it's not right? Also, I know the next step would be a biopsy...but why do they biopsy if you actually get a positive blood test. Really, why wouldn't they just say you are celiac with just the a positive blood test??

Before we got the results my son said to me today "mom, I guess I'm kind of glad that I got the blood test done because if it is positive then I'll be able to make changes and I'll be able to feel good again." So, why should I wait and make him suffer any longer....because who knows when I'd get in to see a GI doctor and then to schedule a biopsy....the whole while making my son eat something that's making him feel bad.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


come dance with me Enthusiast
come dance with me
Posted

I chose not to have the biopsy for my LO who was 7 at the time. A positive is a positive. After 6 months off it the reaction to cross contamination affect on her was unbelieveable! I'm happy with my choice but it's up to you really.

Roda Rising Star
Roda
Posted

My now 6 1/2 year old had a weak positive on his ttg last November. I opted out of doing the biopsy on him at that time. My husband regretted that decision but I wasn't willing to put him back on it for three months to "maybe" get a positive biopsy. He was gluten free for 4 1/2 months when we decided to do a gluten challenge. Lets just say that it didn't go well and my husband is now 100% convinced that the blood test was accurate, that gluten is a problem for him and he has celiac.

My 10 1/2 year old son is a different story. He has repeated blood tests that are negative. I have struggled with trialing him gluten free for about a year now. We changed allergists last July and after him and younger brother was retested for celiac (when his brother showed positive), he is pretty certain that the oldest son is either a sero negative celiac or has non celiac gluten intolerence. He wants him gluten free because of some of his history, his brother being positive on blood work and me being diagnosed via blood and biopsy. After some soul searching and talking with my husband we decided to consult with a pediatric GI. We went last month and discussed his medical history, current symptoms, brother and mine diagnosis and his allergist's recommendation. He goes August 17th for a scope and biopsy. His daddy wanted to exhaust all testing before I put him gluten free. I'm not waiting on the results to put him gluten free. He will at a minimum do a three month trial or if positive results be gluten free for good.

Even though I made different choices with both my boys, I feel for each of them the decision was the right one.

come dance with me Enthusiast
come dance with me
Posted

I was told it's like a pregnancy test in that if you test positive it's extremely unlikely that it's a false positive but if you test negative you can still be positive so further testing may be required.

pain*in*my*gut Apprentice
pain*in*my*gut
Posted

From what I understand (I am new to this, so it's not much :unsure:) if you are "just" gluten intolerant vs. full blown Celiac disease, you don't have an increased risk of developing cancers and all of the serious intestinal damage that comes with Celiac disease. So, for me, having the DX of either gluten-intolerant with or without Celiac is important info to have. In other words, I need to know if it's true Celiac disease so that I can be monitored for things that Celiacs are more prone to get like cancers and diabetes. Also, if I can tell my family "I have been tested by a doctor and without a doubt I have Celiac disease, you might have it too", they will be more likely to get tested and get treated.

Regardless of my biopsy results next month, I am still going gluten free for the rest of my life because of my positive blood tests. I am tired of feeling like crap!! I will have my 6 year old tested (blood work, including genetics), and cross the "to biopsy or not" bridge if we get to it. It's a hard choice to make when you are talking about little ones! :(

carecare Enthusiast
carecare
Posted
  • Author

But being gluten intolerant wouldn't give you a positive blood test...only Celiac would. If that deamidated gliadin test is 98% specific...which I gather means 98% of individuals testing positive on that test are celiac. That plus having symptoms that go away when implementing a gluten free diet is enough for me to believe and actually feel confident telling people he has celiac disease. Also, with the possibility of false negatives on the biopsy end...I'm just content with just the blood test at this point. It's day 3 of gluten free and the sores in his mouth are almost completely gone and don't hurt. I'm hoping the muscles pain will be next! I can't see waiting 2 months for a biopsy and continue to put him through pain and being uncomfortable for the next couple months....when the cure is so easy and can start today. ;)

Good luck with your testing! :)

sue1234 Rookie
sue1234
Posted

Pain in gut, I am also positive on my deaminated anti-gliadin at 45(0-10). My last biopsy two years ago was negative, so was told I'm not celiac. I am having a repeat biopsy soon with another doctor, and then am going gluten-free. May I ask what your level was on your test? Have you had symptoms your whole life? I am 50, but my stomach symptoms of horrendous bloating began 11 years ago.

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


pain*in*my*gut Apprentice
pain*in*my*gut
Posted

Pain in gut, I am also positive on my deaminated anti-gliadin at 45(0-10). My last biopsy two years ago was negative, so was told I'm not celiac. I am having a repeat biopsy soon with another doctor, and then am going gluten-free. May I ask what your level was on your test? Have you had symptoms your whole life? I am 50, but my stomach symptoms of horrendous bloating began 11 years ago.

My DGP was 59 (0-10) :( . Yes I have had symptoms for the last 4 years, which began with a bowel resection for endometriosis (I think this was the trigger for me). I recently put together a timeline of events (I am geek like that) for my GI doc. Here is how it all began for me:

2007

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,636
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Tiana
    Newest Member
    Tiana
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Buckwheat

      By trents · Posted

      Keep in mind that with manufactured food products, "gluten free" doesn't equate to no gluten. Things that are naturally gluten free can be cross-contaminated with gluten in the field, in shipping and in processing. In the U.S. companies can use the gluten free label as long as the product doesn't exceed 20ppm of gluten. That amount still may cause a reaction in some people.
    • deanna1ynne
      Inconclusive results

      By deanna1ynne · Posted

      Dd10 was tested for celiac four years ago bc two siblings were dx’d (positive labs and biopsies). Her results at the time were positive ema  and ttg (7x the UL), but a negative biopsy. We checked again three months later and her ttg was still positive (4x the UL), but ema and biopsy were negative. Doc said it was “potential celiac” and to keep eating gluten, but we were concerned about harming her growth and development while young and had her go gluten-free because we felt the labs and ema in particular were very suggestive of early celiac, despite the negative biopsies. She also had stomach aches and lethargy when eating it. We just felt it’d be better to be safe than sorry. Now, four years later, she doesn’t want to be gluten-free if she doesn’t “have to be,” so underwent a 12 week gluten challenge. She had labs done before starting and all looked great (celiac panel all negative, as expected.) Surprisingly, she experienced no noticeable symptoms when she began eating gluten again, which we felt was a positive sign. However, 12 weeks in, her labs are positive again (ttg 4x the UL and ema positive again as well). Doc says that since she feels fine and her previous two biopsies showed nothing, she can just keep eating gluten and we could maybe biopsy again in two years. I was looking up the ema test and the probability of having not just one but two false positives, and it seems ridiculously low.  Any advice? Would you biopsy again? She’s old enough at this point that I really feel I need her buy-in to keep her gluten-free, and she feels that if the doc says it’s fine, then that’s the final word — which makes me inclined to biopsy again and hope that it actually shows damage this time (not because I want her to have celiac like her sisters, but because I kind of think she already does have it, and seeing the damage now would save her more severe damage in the long run that would come from just continuing to eat gluten for a few more years before testing again.)  Our doc is great - we really like him. But we are very confused and want to protect her. One of her older sibs stopped growing and has lots of teeth problems and all that jazz from not catching the celiac disease sooner, and we don’t want to get to that point with the younger sis. fwiw- she doesn’t mind the biopsy at all. It’s at a children’s hospital and she thinks it’s kind of fun. So it’s not like that would stress her out or anything.
    • Inkie
      Buckwheat

      By Inkie · Posted

      Thanks for the replies. I already use a gluten-free brand of buckwheat flakes I occasionally get itchy bumps. I'm still reviewing all my food products. I occasionally eat prepackaged gluten-free crackers and cookies, so I'll stop using those. I use buckwheat flakes and Doves Farm flour as a base for baking. Would you recommend eliminating those as well? It's a constant search.
    • Wheatwacked
      Frequent nausea after gluten-free diet

      By Wheatwacked · Posted

      Gluten free food is not fortified with vitamins and minerals as regular food is.  Vitamin deficiencies are common especially in recently diagnosed persons,  Get a 25(OH)Vitamin D blood test. And work on raising it.  The safe upper blood level is around 200 nmol/L.    "Low serum levels of 25(OH)D have been associated with increased risk of autoimmune disease onset and/or high disease activity. The role of vitamin D in autoimmune diseases   🏋️‍♂️Good job!   I find the commercial milk will give me mild stomach burn at night, while pasture/grassfed only milk does not bother me at all.  While you are healing, listen to your body.  If it hurts to eat something, eat something else.  You may be able to eat it later, or maybe it is just not good for you.  Lower your Omega 6 to 3 ratio of what you eat.  Most omega 6 fatty acids are inflammation causing.    The standard american diet omega 6:3 ratio is estimated at upward of 14:1.  Thats why fish oil works
    • Inkie
      Thee

      By Inkie · Posted

      I  notice a reaction to tea bags, possibly due to gluten or other substances. Is this recognizable?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.