Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

18 Weeks Pregnant B-12 Very Low


Lindsay630

Recommended Posts

Lindsay630 Rookie

Hi Ladies,

I am 18w1d and had labs drawn last week to check vitamin levels. I found out today that my B12 level is extremely low and my vitamin D level is 31 when 30-100 is normal. I am really stressed out about the B12 and my OB doesn't seem to get why I am insistent on more monitoring. I have been Celiac my who life I believe but diagnosed 1 year ago. I had to insist OB even do these tests as she felt they were unnecessary. I have asked to be referred to a high risk OB/perinatoligist(sp?.

Anyone have these issues? What happened?

Thanks

Lindsay


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Angels Newbie

I am now 35 weeks pregnant and my ob didn't seem to really say much about celiac, other than just stay on the vitamins that are prescribe to me by my general dr, calcium and vitamin D. I think as long as you stay away from any sources of gluten your body tends to make it easier to absord the proper nutrients. I thought I would maybe have to double up on prenatal but that was a no too. My Ob did start to schedule monthly ultrasounds after 18 weeks to monitor the babys growth. But other than that it seemed like she wasn't to overly concerned. Take care and let us know how things are going.

cyberprof Enthusiast

Hi Ladies,

I am 18w1d and had labs drawn last week to check vitamin levels. I found out today that my B12 level is extremely low and my vitamin D level is 31 when 30-100 is normal. I am really stressed out about the B12 and my OB doesn't seem to get why I am insistent on more monitoring. I have been Celiac my who life I believe but diagnosed 1 year ago. I had to insist OB even do these tests as she felt they were unnecessary. I have asked to be referred to a high risk OB/perinatoligist(sp?.

Anyone have these issues? What happened?

Thanks

Lindsay

Hi Lindsay, did you have your vit levels tested before you go pregnant? If you didn't, they may have been low all along. If you are going to see a high-risk OB, then hold off. Otherwise I'd get a sublingual B12 tablet (gluten-free of course) and take that daily. Sub-lingual means "under the tongue" and is sometimes the only way we can take it as the damage to the digestive tract lingers and may prevent absorption in normal ways: Try GNC or a health food store. Trader Joe's has one. The most easily absorbed/used form is Cyanocobalamin but if you can't get that, then get the more common Methylcobalamin, which is harder for the body to use, as I understand it (but I'm not an expert). But it will still help.

As I said, I'm not a doctor but I find that if I skip the sublingual, my energy goes down and I don't feel well.

For vitamin D, you may have to take higher levels. I think the maximum limit now is 10,000 units a day, but I'd be worried about taking that much while pregnant without talking to an expert. B vitamins are different- there's less risk at higher levels. So you should talk to a specialist or a nutritionist on this one. Some people who are deficient in D get infusions monthly. And get as much sun as you can without sunburn.

Lindsay630 Rookie

Hi,

Thanks for your great responses. I finally talked to OB who was not very nice at all. She said well obviously you need B12 injections but my office doesn't do them so figure it out. I was so outraged! Told her I needed a referral for high risk and she said fine! So I called my GI Dr who gave me a B12 injection yesterday and I will take them every other day for 2 weeks and retest and see what is happening. He was not as concerned with the vitamin D. I will see the high risk Dr tomorrow and see what they think.

Thanks again.

  • 2 weeks later...
organicmama Contributor

You can get a prescription and inject the b12 yourself or have your partner do it. It goes in the arm or bottom and is super cheap (free on our not so great HMO). I have been doing it for years. There's no reason to have to go to a doctor for that.

I personally don't see the need for a high risk OB, although I do think you need a new OB period that has a little better demeanor. Many high risk docs primarily end up doing c-sections, so you greatly increase your risk of getting one. The studies indicate that you and the baby are much more at risk typically with a c-section, especialy when they constitute about a third of US births. The estimated rate that they are really needed is 5 - 10%.

B12 often comes combined with folic acid, which is very important to pregnancy. Have you had that checked?

sb2178 Enthusiast

at 18w, the critical point for folate is past (not that you shouldn't fix any deficiencies, just that it's not incredibly time sensitive at this point).

I would also recommend trying to talk someone into testing the infant after birth, or at least discussing whether supplementation might be helpful. Infants of mothers with depleted B12 are sometimes born with insufficint stores since they get it from mama. You'll need a pediatrician with serious knowledge about nutrition or possibly an RD, as that's one thing that was briefly mentioned in a clinical class i had but would not be brought in the vast majority of MD training programs given they get very little nutrition.

31's a bit on the lower side, but the med community is all over the place on where they think it should be, so some would treat, some wouldn't. I'd be sure you are taking an MVI and/or calcium with it, and again, make sure you give the baby vitamin D drops in the recommended amount.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,682
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    Amber1rose
    Newest Member
    Amber1rose
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • Scott Adams
      I'd go with a vodka tonic, but that's just me😉
    • Rejoicephd
      That and my nutritionist also said that drinking cider is one of the worst drink choices for me, given that I have candida overgrowth.  She said the combination of the alcohol and sugar would be very likely to worsen my candida problem.  She suggested that if I drink, I go for clear vodka, either neat or with a splash of cranberry.   So in summary, I am giving ciders a rest.  Whether it's a gluten risk or sugars and yeast overgrowth, its just not worth it.
    • Inkie
      Thank you for the information ill will definitely bring it into practice .
    • Scott Adams
      While plain, pure tea leaves (black, green, or white) are naturally gluten-free, the issue often lies not with the tea itself but with other ingredients or processing. Many flavored teas use barley malt or other gluten-containing grains as a flavoring agent, which would be clearly listed on the ingredient label. Cross-contamination is another possibility, either in the facility where the tea is processed or, surprisingly, from the tea bag material itself—some tea bags are sealed with a wheat-based glue. Furthermore, it's important to consider that your reaction could be to other substances in tea, such as high levels of tannins, which can be hard on the stomach, or to natural histamines or other compounds that can cause a non-celiac immune response. The best way to investigate is to carefully read labels for hidden ingredients, try switching to a certified gluten-free tea brand that uses whole leaf or pyramid-style bags, and see if the reaction persists.
    • Scott Adams
      This is a challenging and confusing situation. The combination of a positive EMA—which is a highly specific marker rarely yielding false positives—alongside strongly elevated TTG on two separate occasions, years apart, is profoundly suggestive of celiac disease, even in the absence of biopsy damage. This pattern strongly aligns with what is known as "potential celiac disease," where the immune system is clearly activated, but intestinal damage has not yet become visible under the microscope. Your concern about the long-term risk of continued gluten consumption is valid, especially given your family's experience with the consequences of delayed diagnosis. Since your daughter is now at an age where her buy-in is essential for a gluten-free lifestyle, obtaining a definitive answer is crucial for her long-term adherence and health. Given that she is asymptomatic yet serologically positive, a third biopsy now, after a proper 12-week challenge, offers the best chance to capture any microscopic damage that may have developed, providing the concrete evidence needed to justify the dietary change. This isn't about wanting her to have celiac; it's about wanting to prevent the insidious damage that can occur while waiting for symptoms to appear, and ultimately giving her the unambiguous "why" she needs to accept and commit to the necessary treatment. This article might be helpful. It breaks down each type of test, and what a positive results means in terms of the probability that you might have celiac disease. One test that always needs to be done is the IgA Levels/Deficiency Test (often called "Total IGA") because some people are naturally IGA deficient, and if this is the case, then certain blood tests for celiac disease might be false-negative, and other types of tests need to be done to make an accurate diagnosis. The article includes the "Mayo Clinic Protocol," which is the best overall protocol for results to be ~98% accurate.    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.