Jump to content

  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):

    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Lab Results Are So Confusing!

21daisygurl

Recommended Posts

21daisygurl Newbie
21daisygurl
Posted

I am SO glad I found this forum!

I have had gastro issues my whole life and despite mentioning it to my doc, noone did any further testing. I have long suspected I am gluten sensitive since I react to gluten products. However, my family doc suggested I see a naturopath to do an elimination diet to see if it really is gluten or something else I am sensitive to. Just for kicks, she threw in some blood work and we were both surprised it came back abnormal.

Here are just the celiac ones I had done (I know there are other tests but these are the ones I had run):

IgA: 1.90 (range 0.69-3.82)

Gliadin IgA: 3.5 (range <11.99)

Gliadin IgG: 23.2 (HIGH) (range <11.99)

Transglutaminase IgA: 2.3 (range <9.99)

In addition my Iron and hemoglobin were low, and my ESR was double the max normal range. Suggesting there is inflammation and probably a bleed.

I know from my research that the Transglutaminase is more specific for celiac, but if my Gliadin is positive, wouldn't that mean I react to gluten? So what is the point of doing a biopsy if I know I react to gluten? And only one of the gliadin immunoglobulins was positive - why not both?

Is the biopsy worth having done? I am waiting to hear from a gastroenterologist but all this is so confusing - I could use some help!

I can't make any diet changes till the biopsy is done - but I don't want my gut to get more damaged than it clearly already is (judging by the inflammation and bleeding).

Thoughts?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


alicewa Contributor
alicewa
Posted

It's a question we all ask ourselves. I had the whole lot done except for the gene test. I was positive for tTG as well as IgG Gliadin and had a positive endoscopy.

Your case doesn't sound as serious as mine. You may have a normal biopsy as a matter of fact due to tTG being normal.

ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

You can have all those tests come back negative and still be very, very ill from celiac. You can also have a false negative on the biopsies. No matter what the results of the biopsy you need to go gluten free when that test is done. Whether you want to have the biopsy done is up to you. Your doctor may give you an official diagnosis with positive blood work and remission of symptoms on the diet. If an official diagnosis is of value to you and you are reluctant to have the endo you could talk to your doctor about diagnosing that way.

Do stay on gluten until all the celiac related tests you choose to do are done and then get on the diet.

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

Hard to know what that panel means, other than your immune system recognizes gluten. You'd have to get a biopsy to discover whether it's celiac or intolerance becasue anti-gliadin IgG can go either way. To my way of thinking, with weird labs it's definitely worth getting the biopsy done.

alicewa Contributor
alicewa
Posted

Here's are two videos by Rodney Ford. It's definitely worth the 10 minutes in total or so to watch them because he talks about a girl who is in a similar situation to yours. The second one talks about various gluten tests and how they work.

Hard to know what that panel means, other than your immune system recognizes gluten. You'd have to get a biopsy to discover whether it's celiac or intolerance becasue anti-gliadin IgG can go either way. To my way of thinking, with weird labs it's definitely worth getting the biopsy done.

Are false negatives worse with labs than the biopsy?

I'd say if the original poster has been eating gluten all along, she might as well have the biopsy if she can.

nora-n Rookie
nora-n
Posted

I woud suggest getting the new deaminated gliadin tests done, both the IgA and IgG versions, since we have had several people here with symptoms and negative ttg, but positive DGP.

That one is very specific for celiac and can pick up patchy celiac.

The ttg test is very bad at picking up patchy celiac.

Patchy celiac is the most common for of celiac nowadays.

peeptoad Apprentice
peeptoad
Posted

Hard to know what that panel means, other than your immune system recognizes gluten. You'd have to get a biopsy to discover whether it's celiac or intolerance becasue anti-gliadin IgG can go either way. To my way of thinking, with weird labs it's definitely worth getting the biopsy done.

Re: the bolded type. This is what confuses me about the lab tests... if a person's body recognizes gluten (or anything else for that matter) as something it needs to produce antibodies against, doesn't that automatically make that substance (gluten, or whatever) a problem for that person regardless of how much antibody production occurs?

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):

Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):


ravenwoodglass Mentor
ravenwoodglass
Posted

Re: the bolded type. This is what confuses me about the lab tests... if a person's body recognizes gluten (or anything else for that matter) as something it needs to produce antibodies against, doesn't that automatically make that substance (gluten, or whatever) a problem for that person regardless of how much antibody production occurs?

I think so. Antibody production can also build up so a low positive on a celiac test could go into a strong postive down the line. IMHO even if the antibodies are at low levels it is wise to drop what is causing the antibodies rather than continueing to injest until your antibodies reach high levels.

21daisygurl Newbie
21daisygurl
Posted
  • Author

Re: the bolded type. This is what confuses me about the lab tests... if a person's body recognizes gluten (or anything else for that matter) as something it needs to produce antibodies against, doesn't that automatically make that substance (gluten, or whatever) a problem for that person regardless of how much antibody production occurs?

AH this is what I was getting at in my OP. Since my body clearly produces antibodies against gluten, whether or not I am celiac shouldn't matter, so much as the fact that my gut is leaky to gluten, correct?

I am going to go watch those video's posted - I appreciate the opinions. I hope I get in to see the specialist soon!

peeptoad Apprentice
peeptoad
Posted

I think so. Antibody production can also build up so a low positive on a celiac test could go into a strong postive down the line. IMHO even if the antibodies are at low levels it is wise to drop what is causing the antibodies rather than continueing to injest until your antibodies reach high levels.

Now, that makes sense... B)

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

Re: the bolded type. This is what confuses me about the lab tests... if a person's body recognizes gluten (or anything else for that matter) as something it needs to produce antibodies against, doesn't that automatically make that substance (gluten, or whatever) a problem for that person regardless of how much antibody production occurs?

The usual antibody in the intestines is IgA since you have normal IgA. IgG is an antibody more associated with allergy, if anything. People can have IgG antibodies to foods and nothing happens at all when they eat them because the food doesn't get to the bloodstream to react with the IgG. Other people are quite sensitive to their IgG foods.

You need the biopsy to know whether you're celiac and the IgA just doesn't happen to be making it into the bloodstream, or whether you're gluten intolerant and not having autoimmune problems. (A nicer situation because there isn't the cancer risk.)

mash Newbie
mash
Posted

My understanding is that IgG is actually a kind of "transient" intolerance as opposed to a lifelong one. Read this document: Open Original Shared Link).pdf where they explain that once your IgG test comes back positive, they will take you off a specific foodstuff for a while and then make a decision on whether or not to reintroduce it.

With Celiac Disease (lifelong intolerance), they are only really looking at IgG if you are IgA deficient.

So yes, you probably need to cut out the gluten, but it might not be for the rest of your life, you might be able to reintroduce it and then test again?

Skylark Collaborator
Skylark
Posted

Mash, SOME celiacs do show IgG in blood, but there is also IgA in the mucosa and damage. The only way to know is the biopsy. Agreed that IgG is more often associated with intolerance, and that some IgG intolerance can be transient.

21daisygurl Newbie
21daisygurl
Posted
  • Author

My understanding is that IgG is actually a kind of "transient" intolerance as opposed to a lifelong one. Read this document: Open Original Shared Link).pdf where they explain that once your IgG test comes back positive, they will take you off a specific foodstuff for a while and then make a decision on whether or not to reintroduce it.

With Celiac Disease (lifelong intolerance), they are only really looking at IgG if you are IgA deficient.

So yes, you probably need to cut out the gluten, but it might not be for the rest of your life, you might be able to reintroduce it and then test again?

Thank you for that document! That sounds exactly right - I did have an inflammatory response based on the bloodwork so this delayed food allergies and chronic complaints sounds like me for sure.

Still haven't heard from the gastroenterologist but I am really enjoying reading all of your different thoughts on this. I really appreciate the constant insight. I am learning so much from you guys.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):


  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,902
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748
    Patty6133
    Newest Member
    Patty6133
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):



  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):


  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      New (possible) celiac diagnosis

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      New (possible) celiac diagnosis

      By Judy M · Posted

      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      Patiently Waiting to See Results

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      Gluten free beer ?

      By Scott Adams · Posted

      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Patiently Waiting to See Results

      By trents · Posted

      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.