Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):
  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Biopsy Or Not?


Rachel--24

Recommended Posts

Rachel--24 Collaborator

I gave my doctor my Enterolab results today and he accepts them as a diagnosis and was very apologetic for all I've gone through the past few years. Apparantly I'm the first patient he's ever had with this so he's wanting to do everything right. He was wanting me to get a biopsy but isn't this kinda useless since I don't have the Celiac gene? Also I've been mostly gluten-free for almost 4 months now...except for supplements and non-food sources. I think he was mostly concerned cuz I had a positive ttg but wouldn't that only indicate damage in someone with celiac disease? Anyways I'm more concerned about the malabsorption then anything else....Is there any point in having a biopsy done now? If anything I'd only want to have an endoscopy or colonoscopy done just to make sure nothing else is going on but I would think the chances of a positive biopsy would probably be slim to none.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Carriefaith Enthusiast
I think he was mostly concerned cuz I had a positive ttg but wouldn't that only indicate damage in someone with celiac disease?
The tissue transglutamase test is highly specific for celiac disease, so if you're results were positive than you would most likely have celiac disease. If you have been mostly gluten-free for 4 months than a biopsy could come back false negative. You would have to go back on gluten for a few months if you wanted to damage the villi, but I don't think this is necessary if other tests have been positive. Some doctors, like mine do think it is necessary and I had to knowingly eat gluten for about 2 months. The biopsy does 100% prove that you have celiac disease if it is positive that is why many doctors want it done.
KaitiUSA Enthusiast

I personally would not bother with a biopsy. It would be useless at this point since you have been gluten free for so long. You would have to get back on gluten for 3 months.

tTG is indicative of damage in the intestines.

Rachel--24 Collaborator
The tissue transglutamase test is highly specific for celiac disease, so if you're results were positive than you would most likely have celiac disease.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I don't have the main gene for celiac disease so I'm thinking there can't be visible damage even if I were still eating gluten. There is no way I'm going back on gluten to find out for sure and my doctor doesnt want me to do that either since I was in very bad shape before I started this diet. He just wants me to do the biopsy anyway....I'm still kind of in the dark about the sensitivity vs. Celiac thing. I think if I had the Celiac gene I'd do the biopsy but since I don't I sorta think it would be useless. I'm not normally scared of tests but that ones seems a little scary to me. :unsure:

Carriefaith Enthusiast

I guess this a decision that only you and your doctor can make. Is there any way that the gene test was not accurate? Also, I believe that I have heard that a small percentage of people can have celiac without the gene, but I could be wrong (someone correct me on this if I am wrong).

I'm not normally scared of tests but that ones seems a little scary to me.
It's not that bad, the colonoscopy is WAY worse in my opinion, give me an endoscopy any day! I was awake for both <_<
Rachel--24 Collaborator
It's not that bad, the colonoscopy is WAY worse in my opinion, give me an endoscopy any day! I was awake for both  <_<

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Wow...I thought the endoscopy was painful if they don't sedate you. I wouldn't try it awake for sure :blink:

tarnalberry Community Regular
I don't have the main gene for celiac disease so I'm thinking there can't be visible damage even if I were still eating gluten. There is no way I'm going back on gluten to find out for sure and my doctor doesnt want me to do that either since I was in very bad shape before I started this diet. He just wants me to do the biopsy anyway....I'm still kind of in the dark about the sensitivity vs. Celiac thing. I think if I had the Celiac gene I'd do the biopsy but since I don't I sorta think it would be useless. I'm not normally scared of tests but that ones seems a little scary to me.  :unsure:

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

You don't have the *main* celiac gene, but the genes that have been identified to correlate to celiac so far only cover 90-95% of cases, NOT 100%.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



KaitiUSA Enthusiast
Is there any way that the gene test was not accurate?

Yes, I have heard of that before. Doesn't usually happen but I believe that gluten intolerance can turn into celiac even without the gene. That would make sense too.

Carriefaith Enthusiast
Wow...I thought the endoscopy was painful if they don't sedate you. I wouldn't try it awake for sure

I was partially sedated for both, but I was awake and fully aware of everything. Sedation was an option for the endoscopy, some people do it with no sedation at all.

Rachel--24 Collaborator

Thanks everyone,

I guess I'll just wait and see what the GI says. Believe it or not with all I've gone through the last few years I saw every specialist (more than once) except the GI doc. He was the LAST specialist I was sent to and only cuz I demanded it since I had lost so much weight and wasnt digesting my food. I saw him in April and all he did was send me for an AIDS test :unsure: What the heck??? At least I now know I'm not sick from AIDS. I was scheduled for the endoscopy/colonoscopy though but due to some confusion about the preperation (I drank the wrong stuff and got sick :rolleyes: ) the test was cancelled. I wish that wouldn't have happened because at that time I'd only been on the diet 3 weeks.

skbird Contributor

About the gene test being accurate - one of the genes I have is mostly associated with people of Medeterranean descent and since I'm 3/4 Dutch and the rest Welsh/Scot, I wrote in and asked if this could be a mistake. The reply I got was no - and that anyone in Europe could have crossed over a gene at some point. As you can see from my av, I don't *look* like I have any Medeterranean in me at all. :)

So I don't know if it's a mistake or not, in either of our cases. You certainly sound like you have Celiac. And an endoscopy probably wouldn't show damage at this point, though it still could - and at any rate it might be good just to check out everything else to make sure nothing else is up in your gut. It's a good idea.

Take care

Stephanie

Guest nini

Just my .02 cents... I personally do not think at this point the biopsy is necessary, it's not going to change anything one way or the other as far as you having to be gluten free. You know you have to be gluten free. IF you do not get any better after say 6 months with absolutely NO improvement, then look into further testing to see what else is wrong... But whether or not you have the biopsy is not going to change how you treat this. Strict Gluten Free diet period. Sounds like your dr. is just trying to do a CYA (covering his butt) after not getting it right before.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - knitty kitty commented on Scott Adams's article in Multiple Sclerosis and Celiac Disease
      3

      Gluten-Free Diet Linked to Reduced Inflammation and Improved Outcomes in Multiple Sclerosis (+Video)

    2. - trents replied to Matthias's topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      1

      Unexpected gluten exposure risk from cultivated mushrooms

    3. - Matthias posted a topic in Coping with Celiac Disease
      1

      Unexpected gluten exposure risk from cultivated mushrooms

    4. - trents replied to catnapt's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      9

      how much gluten do I need to eat before blood tests?

    5. - Scott Adams replied to SilkieFairy's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      2

      IBS-D vs Celiac

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,328
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    VerafromNJ
    Newest Member
    VerafromNJ
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.6k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com communiuty, @Matthias! Yes, we have been aware that this can be an issue with mushrooms but as long as they are rinsed thoroughly it should not be a problem since the mushrooms don't actually incorporate the gluten into their cellular structure. For the same reason, one needs to be careful when buying aged cheeses and products containing yeast because of the fact that they are sometimes cultured on gluten-containing substrate.
    • Matthias
      The one kind of food I had been buying and eating without any worry for hidden gluten were unprocessed veggies. Well, yesterday I discovered yet another pitfall: cultivated mushrooms. I tried some new ones, Shimeji to be precise (used in many asian soup and rice dishes). Later, at home, I was taking a closer look at the product: the mushrooms were growing from a visible layer of shredded cereals that had not been removed. After a quick web research I learned that these mushrooms are commonly cultivated on a cereal-based medium like wheat bran. I hope that info his helpful to someone.
    • trents
      I might suggest you consider buckwheat groats. https://www.amazon.com/Anthonys-Organic-Hulled-Buckwheat-Groats/dp/B0D15QDVW7/ref=sr_1_4_pp?crid=GOFG11A8ZUMU&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.bk-hCrXgLpHqKS8QJnfKJLKbKzm2BS9tIFv3P9HjJ5swL1-02C3V819UZ845_kAwnxTUM8Qa69hKl0DfHAucO827k_rh7ZclIOPtAA9KjvEEYtaeUV06FJQyCoi5dwcfXRt8dx3cJ6ctEn2VIPaaFd0nOye2TkASgSRtdtKgvXEEXknFVYURBjXen1Nc7EtAlJyJbU8EhB89ElCGFPRavEQkTFHv9V2Zh1EMAPRno7UajBpLCQ-1JfC5jKUyzfgsf7jN5L6yfZSgjhnwEbg6KKwWrKeghga8W_CAhEEw9N0.eDBrhYWsjgEFud6ZE03iun0-AEaGfNS1q4ILLjZz7Fs&dib_tag=se&keywords=buckwheat%2Bgroats&qid=1769980587&s=grocery&sprefix=buchwheat%2Bgroats%2Cgrocery%2C249&sr=1-4&th=1 Takes about 10 minutes to cook. Incidentally, I don't like quinoa either. Reminds me and smells to me like wet grass seed. When its not washed before cooking it makes me ill because of saponins in the seed coat. Yes, it can be difficult to get much dietary calcium without dairy. But in many cases, it's not the amount of calcium in the diet that is the problem but the poor uptake of it. And too much calcium supplementation can interfere with the absorption of vitamins and minerals in general because it raises gut pH.
    • Scott Adams
      What you’re describing really does not read like typical IBS-D. The dramatic, rapid normalization of stool frequency and form after removing wheat, along with improved tolerance of legumes and plant foods, is a classic pattern seen in gluten-driven disease rather than functional IBS. IBS usually worsens with fiber and beans, not improves. The fact that you carry HLA-DQ2.2 means celiac disease is absolutely possible, even if it’s less common than DQ2.5, and many people with DQ2.2 present later and are under-diagnosed. Your hesitation to reintroduce gluten is completely understandable — quality of life matters — and many people in your position choose to remain strictly gluten-free and treat it as medically necessary even without formal biopsy confirmation. If and when you’re ready, a physician can help you weigh options like limited gluten challenge, serology history, or documentation as “probable celiac.” What’s clear is that this wasn’t just random IBS — you identified the trigger, and your body has been very consistent in its response.
    • Scott Adams
      Here are some results from a search: Top Liquid Multivitamin Picks for Celiac Needs MaryRuth's Liquid Morning Multivitamin Essentials+ – Excellent daily choice with a broad vitamin/mineral profile, easy to absorb, gluten-free, vegan, and great overall value. MaryRuth's Liquid Morning Multivitamin – Classic, well-reviewed gluten-free liquid multivitamin with essential nutrients in a readily absorbable form. MaryRuth's Morning Multivitamin w/ Hair Growth – Adds beauty-supporting ingredients (biotin, B vitamins), also gluten-free and easy to take. New Chapter Liquid Multivitamin and New Chapter Liquid Multivitamin Orange Mango – Fermented liquid form with extra nutrients and good tolerability if you prefer a whole-food-based formula. Nature's Plus Source Of Life Gold Liquid – Premium option with a broad spectrum of vitamins and plant-based nutrients. Floradix Epresat Adult Liquid Multivitamin – Highly rated gluten-free German-made liquid, good choice if taste and natural ingredients matter. NOW Foods Liquid Multi Tropical Orange – Budget-friendly liquid multivitamin with solid nutrient coverage.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.