Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Gluten Free Vs No Wheat Containing Ingredients?


GFathlete

Recommended Posts

GFathlete Rookie

Hi,

I was comparing soup labels today and the some soups of the same brand will specifically say: CONTAINS WHEAT or CONTAINS SOY. After reading through a list of safe ingredients I assume it is safe if it does not also have the "CONTAINS WHEAT" disclaimer?

Also, what if the same manufacturer has another soups that specifically says: GLUTEN FREE

Is that the only safe one? Can I proceed with the one that is not of the CONTAINS WHEAT family?

What is the difference?


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



sa1937 Community Regular

It sure is a confusing world out there, isn't it? It if contains WHEAT, I'd definitely avoid it. Some people have a sensitivity to soy and avoid it like the plague, too. It's a judgment call on your part.

Progresso is very good at labeling and have quite a few soups that are labeled gluten-free. It's a brand I trust. Their chicken and beef broths are also labeled gluten-free (at least the last time I bought them). Today I bought the Food Lion brand of beef broth (their own line is My Essentials) and noticed for the first time that it says gluten-free on the label although it contains soy.

Any particular brand of soup you're thinking about?

GFathlete Rookie

Well not really, I guess I was asking generally. I noticed a few things when checking labels.

1) Many labels say "contain soy and milk" for example so I am assuming that if it DID contain wheat it would say so.

2) What is the difference between this labeling and "gluten-free"?

Are both labels safe?

Lisa Mentor

Well not really, I guess I was asking generally. I noticed a few things when checking labels.

1) Many labels say "contain soy and milk" for example so I am assuming that if it DID contain wheat it would say so.

2) What is the difference between this labeling and "gluten-free"?

Are both labels safe?

1) Yes, wheat in the US is one of the allergens that must be listed by law. The other glutens, barley, malt and malt are not required to be listed. Sometimes it's a judgment call or a call to the manufacturer. Barley, rye and malt are not used too much in the US, but you have to judge you product ( ie. hot chocolate mix might have malt).

2)Labeling in the US has not yet legislated a legal definition of "gluten free". As of yet, all labeling of "gluten free" is voluntary. We would like to hope that those who label their products as gluten free have tested as such. But that is expensive, and not required.

The current trend may be that products may contain a label stating "no gluten ingredients". I feel fine with that, but others may be more sensitive.

There is a list of companies who will clearly list all forms of gluten on their ingredient listing or allergen warning...Kraft is one, Unilever and more.

ciamarie Rookie

I'm not an expert, however if some of that brand specifically say 'gluten free' and others have no apparent gluten ingredients but do mention other allergens, I'd go with the ones that are labeled gluten-free and leave the others alone. At least until I had more experience or could research it. It's possible there are some spices, or similar flavorings that have some small amount of gluten from barley perhaps, so it won't list wheat but it's not gluten-free, and thus you need to avoid it.

Hope that makes sense?

Skylark Collaborator

If it's Progresso you're talking about, I only eat the soups they are specifically marking gluten-free. I figure there must be something different about the soups without an obvious wheat ingredient that aren't marked gluten-free. I figure the same for any single brand that has some items marked gluten-free and some not. My guess is that it has to do with manufacturing cross-contamination.

The best gluten-free labels will say "certified gluten-free" and have the GFCO symbol. Open Original Shared Link The food is independently tested and monitored to be under 10 ppm gluten.

Beyond that, "gluten-free" can mean anything the company thinks won't end up in a lawsuit. The FDA has not passed any labeling laws.

tarnalberry Community Regular

Just not saying "contains wheat" isn't enough. The labeling laws allow the wheat to either be declared separately (such as those "contains X" labels) or in the ingredient list (and not a "contains" label). In addition, wheat free and gluten free are not the same. Something may say "wheat free" or have no wheat ingredients on the label anywhere, but contain rye or barley, and are hence NOT gluten free. (A great example is Kellogs Rice Crispies (and most other brands). No wheat on the ingredient list. No "contains wheat" statement. But it has barley malt, which has gluten, and makes it NOT SAFE.)


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):



  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      131,899
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    dcarter1682
    Newest Member
    dcarter1682
    Joined

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):


  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.4k
    • Total Posts
      1m

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):





  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):



  • Who's Online (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @Judy M! Yes, he definitely needs to continue eating gluten until the day of the endoscopy. Not sure why the GI doc advised otherwise but it was a bum steer.  Celiac disease has a genetic component but also an "epigenetic" component. Let me explain. There are two main genes that have been identified as providing the "potential" to develop "active" celiac disease. We know them as HLA-DQ 2.5 (aka, HLA-DQ 2) and HLA-DQ8. Without one or both of these genes it is highly unlikely that a person will develop celiac disease at some point in their life. About 40% of the general population carry one or both of these two genes but only about 1% of the population develops active celiac disease. Thus, possessing the genetic potential for celiac disease is far less than deterministic. Most who have the potential never develop the disease. In order for the potential to develop celiac disease to turn into active celiac disease, some triggering stress event or events must "turn on" the latent genes. This triggering stress event can be a viral infection, some other medical event, or even prolonged psychological/emotional trauma. This part of the equation is difficult to quantify but this is the epigenetic dimension of the disease. Epigenetics has to do with the influence that environmental factors and things not coded into the DNA itself have to do in "turning on" susceptible genes. And this is why celiac disease can develop at any stage of life. Celiac disease is an autoimmune condition (not a food allergy) that causes inflammation in the lining of the small bowel. The ingestion of gluten causes the body to attack the cells of this lining which, over time, damages and destroys them, impairing the body's ability to absorb nutrients since this is the part of the intestinal track responsible for nutrient absorption and also causing numerous other food sensitivities such as dairy/lactose intolerance. There is another gluten-related disorder known as NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity or just, "gluten sensitivity") that is not autoimmune in nature and which does not damage the small bowel lining. However, NCGS shares many of the same symptoms with celiac disease such as gas, bloating, and diarrhea. It is also much more common than celiac disease. There is no test for NCGS so, because they share common symptoms, celiac disease must first be ruled out through formal testing for celiac disease. This is where your husband is right now. It should also be said that some experts believe NCGS can transition into celiac disease. I hope this helps.
    • Judy M
      My husband has had lactose intolerance for his entire life (he's 68 yo).  So, he's used to gastro issues. But for the past year he's been experiencing bouts of diarrhea that last for hours.  He finally went to his gastroenterologist ... several blood tests ruled out other maladies, but his celiac results are suspect.  He is scheduled for an endoscopy and colonoscopy in 2 weeks.  He was told to eat "gluten free" until the tests!!!  I, and he know nothing about this "diet" much less how to navigate his in daily life!! The more I read, the more my head is spinning.  So I guess I have 2 questions.  First, I read on this website that prior to testing, eat gluten so as not to compromise the testing!  Is that true? His primary care doctor told him to eat gluten free prior to testing!  I'm so confused.  Second, I read that celiac disease is genetic or caused by other ways such as surgery.  No family history but Gall bladder removal 7 years ago, maybe?  But how in God's name does something like this crop up and now is so awful he can't go a day without worrying.  He still works in Manhattan and considers himself lucky if he gets there without incident!  Advice from those who know would be appreciated!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • Scott Adams
      You've done an excellent job of meticulously tracking the rash's unpredictable behavior, from its symmetrical spread and stubborn scabbing to the potential triggers you've identified, like the asthma medication and dietary changes. It's particularly telling that the rash seems to flare with wheat consumption, even though your initial blood test was negative—as you've noted, being off wheat before a test can sometimes lead to a false negative, and your description of the other symptoms—joint pain, brain fog, stomach issues—is very compelling. The symmetry of the rash is a crucial detail that often points toward an internal cause, such as an autoimmune response or a systemic reaction, rather than just an external irritant like a plant or mites. I hope your doctor tomorrow takes the time to listen carefully to all of this evidence you've gathered and works with you to find some real answers and effective relief. Don't be discouraged if the rash fluctuates; your detailed history is the most valuable tool you have for getting an accurate diagnosis.
    • Scott Adams
      In this case the beer is excellent, but for those who are super sensitive it is likely better to go the full gluten-free beer route. Lakefront Brewery (another sponsor!) has good gluten-free beer made without any gluten ingredients.
    • trents
      Welcome to the forum, @catsrlife! Celiac disease can be diagnosed without committing to a full-blown "gluten challenge" if you get a skin biopsy done during an active outbreak of dermatitis herpetiformis, assuming that is what is causing the rash. There is no other known cause for dermatitis herpetiformis so it is definitive for celiac disease. You would need to find a dermatologist who is familiar with doing the biopsy correctly, however. The samples need to be taken next to the pustules, not on them . . . a mistake many dermatologists make when biopsying for dermatitis herpetiformis. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.