Jump to content
  • Welcome to Celiac.com!

    You have found your celiac tribe! Join us and ask questions in our forum, share your story, and connect with others.




  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A1):



    Celiac.com Sponsor (A1-M):


  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Our Content
    eNewsletter
    Donate

Endoscopy Question


Rick-O-Shay

Recommended Posts

Rick-O-Shay Apprentice

Hello,

I have barrett's esophagus. My dr wants me to get scoped in January for it. During my consult I mentioned that going gluten free seemed to help my GI related issues. He said that celiac is very under diagnosed in this country (he said that Europe is catching on quicker than the US) and that he will biopsy me for celiac while he is doing the scope. I mentioned that I have been trying to go gluten free for about a month now and have heard that you need to continue to eat gluten for your test to be positive if you have celiac. His response was that blood tests are more sensitive to staying on the gluten diet while being tested and that not eating gluten for a couple months before the test would not interfere with the results, as reversal of celiac related symptoms takes quite awhile.

He said I was more than welcome to "gluten up" if I wanted to, but there was no need to since I have only been gluten free for about 2 months by the time I am tested.

I just wanted to get others opinions on it, as I don't plan on having another endoscopy for many years, so I want to do the test as accurate as I can.

Thanks,


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



RandallPotter Newbie

Do not listen to your doctor. ( Website sources at the end of this post. )

I experienced the same thing with mine and my nurse.

As for an "official" reason... Check out the National Institutes of Health's site on Celiac (.GOV)

It says that for all tests to be done accurately that a person cannot be gluten free before the tests are conducted. This is for all tests whether blood or scope.

I was gluten free for a week, and in the months prior to that I had tried being vegetarian and following a pescatarian diet. My symptoms had improved with these obviously.

I read that your body can start healing your intestine within 2 weeks.

After being gluten free, "glutening up" doesn't have much affect as the blood test is testing antibodies. These antibodies are built up over time by your body and subside if they are not needed.

I suggest a new doctor. I followed through with my endoscopy with my current doctor merely because we had met our deductible for the year and if it comes back positive well that was a cheap way to find out. I have another appointment with a doctor the celiac foundation recommended after the first of the year.

With all of that said, then another site says if you have been gluten free for a while and are doing fine, it probably isn't the best idea to reintroduce it to your system.

https://www.celiac.com/articles/22446/1/Do-I-have-to-Re-introduce-Gluten-in-Order-to-have-an-Accurate-Gluten-Sensitivity-Test-Done/Page1.html

NIH:

Open Original Shared Link

"Before being tested, one should continue to eat a diet that includes foods with gluten, such as breads and pastas. If a person stops eating foods with gluten before being tested, the results may be negative for celiac disease even if the disease is present."

This website:

https://www.celiac.com/articles/57/1/Interpretation-of-Celiac-Disease-Blood-Test-Results/Page1.html

"First, and this applies to any of the blood tests, you must currently be on a gluten containing diet for the tests to be accurate. antibodies are produced by the immune system in response to substances that the body perceives as threatening. The immune response that your body produces is its response to being exposed to gluten in the diet and its subsequent effect on the intestinal mucosa. If there is no gluten in the diet, then there is no response that we can measure. A brief change in diet will not have a noticeable effect. If you have been gluten free for a week or so, it will not make any great difference. The response might be marginally less but the difference is insignificant because the body has not had time to respond to the change. Conversely, if you have been gluten free for a protracted period of time and decide to be tested, a brief challenge of a couple of weeks is not enough to elicit a response and get an accurate test. "

Blood testing not very accurate:

https://www.celiac.com/articles/22310/1/Blood-Testing-for-Celiac-Disease-Isnt-Very-Accurate/Page1.html

At the end of it all. I would at least get a second opinion and perhaps contact the Celiac Foundation and ask them for their recommended doctors.

Celiac Foundation:

Open Original Shared Link

( I'm not a doctor and my response shouldn't be taken as a medically certified expert advice. )

RandallPotter Newbie

I'll follow up with some endoscopy related reference materials:

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

Open Original Shared Link

"If you have already started a gluten-free diet before these tests are done, the doctor may suggest you or your child eat a certain amount of gluten before the tests."

"How Long Does it Take to Heal After Removing Gluten?"

Open Original Shared Link

( I'm not a doctor and my response shouldn't be taken as a medically certified expert advice. )

  • 3 weeks later...
Scotslass Newbie

yes , get some gluten down you . :blink: .Your gut will react if you have coeliacs and the Dr will be able to tell from the flattened Villi..

navigator Apprentice

Prior to my endescope I was advised that the minimum amount of time that you have to go back on gluten is 6 weeks but the general consensus on this forum seems to be 2 to 3 months. I know that it's a thought to go back on gluten but if you don't you could get a false negative.

  • 2 weeks later...
xjrosie Apprentice

Prior to my endescope I was advised that the minimum amount of time that you have to go back on gluten is 6 weeks but the general consensus on this forum seems to be 2 to 3 months. I know that it's a thought to go back on gluten but if you don't you could get a false negative.

My daughter was glutened for only three weeks prior to her scope. Her doctor brought the pictures out to me and said, "yep, she's got it. I'll go ahead and test the biopsy but it's pretty much just a formality." I think it depends on the person's sensitivity?

navigator Apprentice

Yes, you're right thatwe're all different and respond in different ways. My daughter went gluten free following her positive blood test and when she went for her endescope they weren't happy that she'd been gluten free for a few weeks. However she was also told immediately that she had coeliac disease.

I think that all sort of factors might come into play - length of time undiagnosed, level of damage, amount of time gluten free and amount of time back on gluten etc.

My daughter had been at GPs, emergemcy rooms and hospital consultants 20 years. She was finally so ill that she was admitted to hospital where they ran 3 or 4 tests daily. On the seventh day one of these was for coeliac. I think in her case the damage was to such an extent that a couple of weeks gluten free still revealed damage.

I was 53 at diagnosis and it appears that I've been getting misdiagnosed since I was a school child. I went back on gluten, as requested by the GI,for seven weeks before endescopy. Although it was difficult and I couldn't have done it if I'd been working at the time, I thought it was worth doing it to lessen my chance of getting a false negative. I'll never know if I would've got a positive result if I'd remained gluten free.

At the end of day, I feel that it's a personal choice to be made by weighing up all the factors.

Hope that your daughter is improving now she's gluten free.


Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):
Celiac.com Sponsor (A8):



Celiac.com Sponsor (A8-M):



Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Get Celiac.com Updates:
    Support Celiac.com:
    Join eNewsletter
    Donate

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):
    Celiac.com Sponsor (A17):





    Celiac.com Sponsors (A17-M):




  • Recent Activity

    1. - JoJo0611 posted a topic in Gluten-Free Foods, Products, Shopping & Medications
      0

      Yeast extract

    2. - trents replied to Seabeemee's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Labs ? Awaiting in person follow up with my GI

    3. - Seabeemee posted a topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      1

      Labs ? Awaiting in person follow up with my GI

    4. - trents replied to mike101020's topic in Celiac Disease Pre-Diagnosis, Testing & Symptoms
      3

      EMA Result

  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A19):
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      133,165
    • Most Online (within 30 mins)
      7,748

    AmynDevyn
    Newest Member
    AmynDevyn
    Joined
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A20):
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A22):
  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      121.5k
    • Total Posts
      1m
  • Celiac.com Sponsor (A21):
  • Upcoming Events

  • Posts

    • JoJo0611
      Please can anyone help. I was diagnosed on 23rd December and I am trying my best to get my head around all the things to look out for. I have read that yeast extract is not to be eaten by coeliacs. Why? And is this all yeast extract. Or is this information wrong. Thanks. 
    • trents
      Welcome to the celiac.com community, @Seabeemee! The fact that the genetic testing shows you do not have either of the two genes associated with the potential to develop celiac disease (HlA DQ2 and HLA DQ8) pretty much ensures that you do not have celiac disease and the biopsy of the small bowel showing "normal villous architecture" confirms this. But you could have NCGS (Non Celiac Gluten Sensitivity) which would not damage the villous architecture. You could also have SIBO (Small Intestine Bacterial Overgrowth) or H. Pylori infection. Both of these conditions would thrive on carbs and you do say you feel better when you don't eat a lot of carbs. And with your resection of the small bowel, that could be causing it's own problems like you describe. When was that surgery done? You have had over 1 foot of your small bowel removed by that surgery in 2022 so that would certainly challenge digestion and nutrient absorption.  Edited
    • Seabeemee
      My Doctor messaged me that I have no sign of Celiac disease so until I meet with her next week I don’t know what the labs mean. I am being evaluated by my new GI for Celiac disease because of digestive issues (bloating, distention, fullness in mid section, diarrhea).  I also have been diagnosed with GERD and some associated issues hence the endoscopy. I also was diagnosed with NAFLD after an abdominal CT scan in December - which surprises me because I gave up alcohol 5 years ago, workout 5 days a week, cardio / weights and cook from scratch every night. Anecdotally,  I do feel better when I do not eat a lot of carbs and have been staying away from gluten 95% of the time until my follow up.  History: I had an emergency bowel obstruction operation in August 2021 for a double closed loop obstruction, open surgery removed 40 cm of my small intestine, my appendix, cecal valve and illeocectomy. Beside the fact that this put me in the situation of no longer being able to absorb Vitamin B12  from my diet and having to  inject Vit B 12 2x a month, I also became Iron deficient and am on EOD iron to keep my levels high enough to support my Vitamin B12 injections, as well as daily folic acid. I tested positive for pernicious anemia in 2022 but most recently that same test came back negative. Negative Intrinsic Factor. My results from the biopsies showed 2nd part of Duodenum, small bowel Mildly patch increased intraepithelial lymphocytes with intact villious architecture. Comment: Duodenal biopsies with normal villous architecture and increased intrepithelial lymphocytes (Marsh I lesion) are found in 1-3% of patients undergoing duodenal biopsy, and an association with celiac disease is well established however the specificity remains low. Similar histologic findings may be seen in H pylori gastritis, NSAID and other medication use including olmesartan, bacterial overgrowth, tropical sprue and certain autoimmune disorders. So my GI ordered Labs for Celiac confirmation: Sorry I couldn’t upload a photo or pdf so typed below: TEST NAME                               IN RANGE and/or RESULTS RESULTS:  IMMUNOGLOBULIN A :           110 GLIADIN (DEAMIDATED) AB (IGG, IGA)                            <1.0 GLIADIN (DEAMIDATED) AB (IGA)                                     <1.0 GLIADIN (DEAMIDATED) AB (IGG)                                    <1.0 TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE ANTIBODY, IGG, IGA TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE AB, IGG                                     <1.0 TISSUE TRANSGLUTAMINASE AB, IGA                                     <1.0 INTERPRETATION: <15.0 ANTIBODY NOT DETECTED  > OR = 15.0 ANTIBODY DETECTED RESULTS: HLA TYPING FOR CELIAC DISEASE INTERPRETATION (note The patient does not have the HLA-DQ associated with celiac disease variants) More than 97% of celiac patients carry either HLA-DQ2 (DQA1*05/DQB1*02) or HLA-DQ8 (DQA1*03/DQB1*0302) or both. Genetic counseling as needed. HLA DQ2 : NEGATIVE HLA D08: NEGATIVE HLA VARIANTS DETECTED: HLA DA1* : 01 HLA DA1* : 05 HLA DQB1*: 0301 HLA DQB1*: 0501 RESULTS REVIEWED BY: Benjamin A Hilton, Ph.D., FACMG I appreciate any input, thank you.         
    • trents
      Let me hasten to add that if you will be undergoing an endoscopy/biopsy, it is critical that you do not begin efforts to reduce gluten beforehand. Doing so will render the results invalid as it will allow the small bowel lining to heal and, therefore, obscure the damage done by celiac disease which is what the biopsy is looking for.
    • Scott Adams
      This article, and the comments below it, may be helpful:    
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

NOTICE: This site places This site places cookies on your device (Cookie settings). on your device. Continued use is acceptance of our Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy.